192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 06:07 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Whose side are the academics on? Not America's.

Who can tell me why the above is not true? Nobody answered my question on values so I won't hold my breath.


Well, there's this explanation:

White Millennials Aren't As Progressive As You Think
Hari Ziyad
BYHARI ZIYAD
Hari Ziyad is the Editor-in-Chief of RaceBaitR. Their work has been featured on Gawker, Out, Ebony, Mic, The Guardian, Paste Magazine, Colorlines, and many other publications. They are also an assistant editor for Vinyl Poetry & Prose and contributing writer for Black Youth Project. Follow Hari @RaceBaitR

SEP 01, 2016

From lazy and entitled to open-minded and accepting, the label “Millennial” can represent very different things to different people. Indeed, as the biggest and most diverse adult generation, Millennials exist at the intersection of conflicting identities, experiences, and expectations.

Despite our noted diversity, frequently overlooked in discussions about Millennials is the degree to which race, gender, sexuality, faith, and other factors can contribute far more to our personal identities than our age group. That notion has been made clear by GenForward, a series of monthly surveys published by the Black Youth Project at the University of Chicago.

Over the last three months, GenForward has been illuminating the depth of race’s impact on Millennial identity formation. Its latest survey suggests the progressive ideology widely prescribed to young Americans is, in fact, often only true for young people of color.

For example, the report finds that although Hillary Clinton enjoys the support of Black (60 percent), Asian-American (52 percent), and Latinx (49 percent) 18 to 30 year-olds by broad margins, white young adults are evenly divided in their support for her and Donald Trump (28 percent each). The survey also finds that 66 percent of white young adults believe that the Black Lives Matter organization’s rhetoric encourages violence against police, compared to just 19 percent of Black respondents.

The data is clear: race crucially informs drastically different and even oppositional worldviews among young adults. A Millennial monolith is a myth, and this truth should instruct how we engage the term and the diverse group of individuals it’s supposed to represent, especially when it comes to politics.

Many young people are presenting questions that force us to rethink our world, understanding the truth that it only now works for some as it is. There are, however, just as many young people for whom the world works just fine, and who fight with equal vigor to keep it that way. Politically, these groups of young people are as different as night and day, and those differences matter. In overlooking them and presenting Millennials monolithically, we set ourselves up for a future that is a mere mirage of social and political change, while many of society’s flaws continue to advance. Indeed, progress will not be made around racism in particular while white Millennials remain as racist as their parents.

A view of young people that lacks this racial lens allows white youth to escape the difficult and necessary responsibility of addressing systems of violence they uphold on the backs of their peers of color. If we equate youth with progress in general terms, we promote the false idea that systems of oppression can somehow be bred away and require no more work than time. We allow many of the very people responsible for the social ills of racism off the hook, while also ignoring how they make possible the continuation of the problems of those whom are most afflicted.

Conversations that acknowledge the ever-present realities of oppression are difficult to have. They demand that we give up unearned privileges and require more of us than simply waiting for new generations to take charge. These conversations demand that every one of us actively deconstruct racism, sexism, and our participation in social barriers of marginalized people every day, even and especially the youngest of us who are responsible for ushering in our future.

That young adults share the experience of youth and relative inexperience is significant. But equally significant is the way youth is influenced by other factors and experiences. Understanding and engaging this influence could mean the difference between a genuinely freer future and one that is only an illusion.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 06:08 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
yeah, they probably aren't. certainly aren't smart enough to distinguish fact from ideology.
We certainly have no problem pointing out the left's many factual errors.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 06:14 am
This is so typical of Trump. Hell, there are lots of reasons to criticize Amazon — but using the U.S. postal system to deliver good isn't one of them.

Quote:
WASHINGTON — President Trump spent much of last spring accusing Amazon of pulling a “scam” on the American taxpayer and ripping off the United States Postal Service. On Tuesday, his administration delivered its own verdict: Not so much.

The task force created by Mr. Trump to investigate the Postal Service’s finances did conclude that the mail system is losing money. But a report issued on Tuesday said that commercial package delivery for Amazon and other e-commerce retailers was actually profitable for the Postal Service and was not costing the United States “massive amounts of money,” as Mr. Trump has suggested in his tweets.

NYT
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  4  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 06:47 am
@snood,
I stopped reading him over a year ago, but judging by what other posters quote he's not changed at all.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  5  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 07:13 am
Analysis: 4 takeaways from Mueller’s sentencing memo for Michael Flynn(VOX)
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 09:51 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Unlike the DNC, they notified the FBI and let them start investigating. The FBI to this day never saw any of the PC's from the DNC that were used. Why is that?
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 10:08 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
I always wonder what a liberal chemist learns differently??

You are kidding right, when I see replies like this I know you know exactly what people are talking about, but you have to make some sort of ridiculous reply to divert from the topic at hand. We aren't so concerned with STEM, although Climate Change, we can agree that the climate is changing but we disagree on the reasons, is twisting science and the latest push towards a belief that there are more than 2 sexes in humans, is pushing a liberal agenda. History, socialist economy classes and the "social sciences" are the biggest pushers of a left-wing ideology. I'm pretty sure it isn't Engineering majors who are protesting on college campus's, it's likely the hundreds of Sociology students that the schools are pumping out.

When was the last time you were to a University Graduation? I was at one in 2016 for UW Madison. Total Engineering students with all levels of degree's looked to be about 300-400. When the Sociology students stood up, there had to be over 1000 of them. It was sad to see all those kids graduating with a worthless degree they will never be able to pay back. Social workers don't make that much money and surely not enough to pay for a school that cost them close to $100,000 for 4 years. You wonder why so many college students are demanding free school?
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 10:08 am
@Baldimo,
Quote:
Why is that?

You suggesting there's something sinister?
Quote:
We aren't so concerned with STEM, although Climate Change, we can agree that the climate is changing but we disagree on the reasons, is twisting science and the latest push towards a belief that there are more than 2 sexes in humans, is pushing a liberal agenda.

What are you talking about?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 11:44 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Have you read any of Coldjoint's posts? He's a bigot, a racist, and a neo Nazi, and all his posts reflect his odious beliefs.

You can do what MJ could not. Produce those posts and prove what you say. But you won't because there is nothing in them but facts that show you and the others are perpetuating a lie because I disagree with your cowardly lock step lies about the real world and consequences from the stupidity called progressive group think.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  4  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 11:57 am
Quote:
These companies claimed the GOP tax bill would ‘boost jobs.’ Now they’re laying off employees.

The businesses who led the charge for a massive cut in the corporate tax rate still claim it is working great.


In the lead-up to the enactment of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, Donald Trump’s massive tax cut that mostly benefited rich people and big corporations, a coalition of powerful business interests formed with one major priority in mind: slashing the corporate tax rate. The Reforming America’s Taxes Equitably (RATE) Coalition comprised dozens of companies and trade groups that all insisted lowering corporate taxes would mean more jobs.

A ThinkProgress review found that about half of RATE Coalition’s members have made layoffs since the law’s enactment. In other words, not only did the expensive tax cut not bring more jobs, it couldn’t even forestall significant job losses.

In 2017, the RATE Coalition’s website identified 32 companies and trade groups who had come together around the singular mission to “reform the tax code, making it fairer and simpler and improving the prospects of growth and jobs in the U.S. economy by reducing the corporate income tax rate to make it more competitive with our nation’s major trading partners.” Together, they constituted a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organization (first launched in 2011) and promised that a corporate tax rate reduction would “boost job creation and economic growth.”

Their membership list was a who’s who of Big Business: Aetna Inc., AT&T, Altria Client Services, Association of American Railroads, Boeing, Brown-Forman, Capital One, Cox Enterprises, CVS Caremark, Edison Electric Institute, FedEx, Ford, General Dynamics, Home Depot, Intel, Kimberly-Clark, Liberty Media, Lockheed Martin, Macy’s, National Retail Federation, Nike, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Reynolds American, S&P Global, Southern Company, Synchrony Financial, T-Mobile, UPS, Verizon, Viacom, and Walmart.

In just the second quarter of 2017 alone, their combined corporate lobbying on taxes and other issues exceeded $48 million.

Their coalition lead the charge to lower the 35-percent corporate tax rate (which very few of the biggest companies actually paid) to just 20 percent. They mobilized support with an ad campaign that they say included more than “110 million ad impressions in key states” and “240,000 contacts to Congress.”

The pressure campaign mostly worked: Trump called the corporate tax rate reduction non-negotiable, and the final bill included a 21-percent top corporate tax rate. The RATE Coalition strongly backed the legislation, and Trump signed the law on Dec. 22, 2017, to the coalition’s delight.

But as Phil Collins once sang, “something happened on the way to heaven.” Corporate coffers swelled and shareholders reaped the benefits. Yet even with this windfall, layoffs followed at many of the RATE Coalition member companies.

Nearly a year later, the group is now focused on a new mission: “to ensure that the American people — who ultimately bore the burden of what was previously the highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world – will not be deprived of their meaningful tax reform wins.” Its membership list has apparently changed a bit: McGraw Hill, Financial, Time Warner Cable, and Walt Disney are now in the coalition; Boeing, Brown-Forman, Capital One, Home Depot, Intel, S&P Global, Viacom, and Walmart have vanished from the list. CVS-Caremark is also no longer listed, though it merged with Aetna which is still part of the coalition. A spokesperson for S&P Global told ThinkProgress that it is still a member of the RATE Coalition as well.

Of those 35 current and possibly former members, about half have seen layoffs of their employees (or their member’s employees) or other job eliminations in the past year.

AT&T
The Guardian reported in August that while AT&T received a windfall of tens of billions from the tax bill, its outsourcing and facility closures continued apace. According to the Communication Workers of America union, the company had already laid off about 7,000 workers since the company celebrated the bill’s passage. AT&T disputed this number at the time and told ThinkProgress that it hired nearly 16,000 workers in the first 10 months of 2018.

A company spokesperson wrote in an email that AT&T has said it “plans to invest an additional $1 billion in the U.S. this year as a result of tax reform, and that research shows that every $1 billion in capital invested in the telecom industry creates about 7,000 good-paying jobs for American workers, across the broader economy.” She added that while “technology improvements are driving higher efficiencies and there are some areas where demand for our legacy services continues to decline, and we must sometimes adjust our workforce in some of those areas,” the bulk of their “union-represented employees have a job offer guarantee that ensures they are offered another job with the company if their current job is eliminated.”

Brown-Forman
A June report in the Louisville Courier Journal noted that the makers of Jack Daniel’s and other alcoholic beverages had recently “extended early retirement offers to about 150 salaried employees, looking to shed dozens of workers earning solid six-figure salaries.” Brown-Forman did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Capital One
At least two major job cuts were reported in 2018 at Capital One: one impacting 180 employees in Delaware and another affecting 286 employees in Texas. Capital One did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Cox Enterprises
Cox’s automotive division decided to make several hundred layoffs, according to an October report in Automotive News. A spokesperson told the publication “These changes, while difficult, are needed for Cox Automotive to deliver on the most relevant products and services for our clients and the industry.” Cox did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Ford
Amid Donald Trump’s tariffs — which cost Ford a reported $1 billion — the company announced in October a major restructuring that would include layoffs. They said these cuts were “to support the company’s strategic objectives, create a more dynamic and empowering work environment, and become more fit as a business.” This came after thousands of hourly assembly plant workers in Michigan were temporarily laid off by the company. Ford did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

General Dynamics
In February, General Dynamics reportedly filed documentation warning it would soon lay off 73 employees in Virginia. The mammoth defense contractor’s San Diego-based General Dynamics-NASSCO subsidiary announced another 300 to 350 layoffs in August. General Dynamics did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Intel
In June, Intel announced it had “decided to reduce its workforce by laying off approximately 65 employees at its facilities” in the Silicon Valley. This came on the heels of the company’s decision to shutter its smart glasses division, which it predicted would also mean some layoffs for employees on that 200-person team. Intel did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Kimberly-Clark
The New York Times reported in January that Kimberly-Clark, makers of Kleenex and Huggies, would cut 5,000 to 5,500 jobs — about 13 percent of its work force. According to that report, “To help pay for the cuts and other restructuring moves, Kimberly-Clark said, it will use savings from the recently enacted corporate tax cut.” Kimberly-Clark did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Lockheed Martin
The defense contractor announced at the end of July that it was laying off all of the employees in its 500-person Sikorsky-Lockheed Martin facility in Palm Beach, Florida. A Lockheed Martin spokesperson emailed to say she was out of the office and would “look to send you our hiring numbers for 2018,” but did not do so by press time.

Macy’s
Macy’s announced multiple store closures in 2018 as part of its previously announced downsizing. Additionally, it laid off several members of its human resources team. A Macy’s spokesperson told ThinkProgress that the store closure were all part of its 2016 decision to close 100 stores — most of which have now been carried out — and that the human resources reductions were tied to that. Asked whether the company’s windfall from the tax cuts had in any way lessened the number of closures and layoffs, she said only, “I wouldn’t tie the two together.”

Northrop Grumman
The defense contractor Northrop Grumman announced 59 layoffs at Fort Hood in Texas in January 2018. The same month, it increased its predicted layoffs at Schriever Air Force Base in Colorado from 50 to 85. Northrop Grumman did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

T-Mobile
Following the April announcement that T-Mobile and Sprint would attempt to merge, the company’s union predicted such a move could mean 28,000 job cuts. But according to the Kansas City Star, the company was already preparing to layoff 500 employees at its headquarters this spring.T-Mobile did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Verizon
In October, Verizon reportedly offered a “voluntary severance package” to 44,000 employees and outsourced thousands of information technology jobs to a company based in India. The CEO told workers the move was “an opportunity to find more efficiencies in the size and scope of our V Team and help expedite the building of an innovative operating model for our future.” Verizon did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Viacom
In August, after acquiring the California-based Awesomeness, the entertainment company reportedly laid off 98 employees — half the staff. Viacom did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Walmart
In January, Walmart closed 63 Sam’s Club locations, laying off about 10,000 employees. The subsidiary’s CEO told the Wall Street Journal that this was part of a strategy “to transform the business.” The company also reportedly made hundreds of layoffs at its Walmart stores and corporate headquarters. The layoffs came almost at the exact same time as the company made a big show of giving a bonus to some employees in recognition of the tax cuts. Walmart did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Walt Disney
According to Variety, Disney’s Consumer Products Interactive Media Group laid off fewer than 50 employees in September. Deadline also reported layoffs of fewer than 20 employees at the company’s Digital Disney Network in November. Walt Disney did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Association of American Railroads
The trade association for the rail industry represents railroads across the nation. At least two of its members, Union Pacific and CSX, have reportedly made layoffs in 2018. The Association did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the job cuts.

Edison Electric Institute
The trade association for the electric industry represents numerous American electrical utilities. At least two of its core members, AES and PPL, reportedly decided to cut jobs in 2018, as did two affiliated companies, General Electric and Schneider Electric. A spokesperson told ThinkProgress, “The benefits from the Tax Cut and Jobs Act are flowing back to electric company customers, as electric companies have announced almost $7 billion in tax reform benefits heading back to customers.”

The National Retail Federation
The National Retail Federation does not publicly disclose its members, but major retail companies cut thousands of jobs in 2018, including many positions at companies like Toys ‘R’ Us, Macy’s, Sears/Kmart, J.C. Penney, and Foot Locker.

A spokesperson for the RATE Coalition told ThinkProgress in an emailed statement:

Quote:
Overall, more than 2.1 million new jobs have been created since the passage of tax reform, further igniting an economy that recently reclaimed its spot as the world’s most competitive and has enjoyed the ‘strongest back-to-back quarters of growth since 2014.’ And as the unemployment rate sinks to a generational low and wages rise at the fastest pace since 2009, ‘U.S. small business optimism just hit its highest level in history.’

“Such tremendous success demonstrates precisely why the achievement of a globally competitive corporate tax rate was a bipartisan priority pushed by high-profile Democratic voices for decades, from former presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, to current leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, to the Center for American Progress, which proposed a lower statutory rate for businesses in 2012.


But regardless of economic growth and confidence, the people who promised job growth in exchange for rate cuts have already broken their promises. As the new Congress considers how to fund key programs and address the nearly $1 trillion budget deficit the tax cuts helped fuel, they might be less likely to take the RATE Coalition at its word.



Links embedded at the source.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 12:09 pm
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 12:34 pm
@snood,
Quote:
someone would have to be willfully blind

What you are saying is someone has to be willing to be insulted and lied about by arrogant losers if they dare disagree with their opinions. That is all your post says. I for one could care less what you say, and I cannot be the only one, and that pisses you off to no end. And that is a good thing.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 01:23 pm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtloV9-VYAA2Hxd?format=jpg&name=small
Just a reminder.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 01:28 pm
@coldjoint,
Figures youwould still be in that birther bullshit.wanna talk about trmps taxes? Or his foundations records?? Of the national enquirers safe full of trump dirt bought and not published? Thought not.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 01:30 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
These conversations demand that every one of us actively deconstruct racism, sexism, and our participation in social barriers of marginalized people every day, even and especially the youngest of us who are responsible for ushering in our future.

Nice of you to bold this absolute bullshit like it actually means something. Everyone of needs to obey the laws and treat people like individuals. The last thing we need is the manufacturing of guilt based on lies.

This victim and oppressor crap is aimed squarely at destroying Western society and really nothing else.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 01:40 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Figures youwould still be in that birther bullshit

Figures you would think that any of your posts matter to me. You are a proven liar.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 01:45 pm
@coldjoint,
High flown words. Yoy coould do your paart by not writung racist crap. Reactionary curmudgeons have been talking about the death of western civilization since the classic greeks. Get in line.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 01:47 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Yoy coould do your paart by not writung racist crap.

What racist crap? Produce some, or reinforce your standing as a liar.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 01:57 pm
@coldjoint,
I have. Alll your islamophobic bullpucky.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 5 Dec, 2018 02:03 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Alll your islamophobic bullpucky.

You keep getting yourself in deeper. I do not lie about Islam and you of all people have no chance of proving I do. But once again I want you to find one lie about Islam.

I am confident you will not find one. And respond with your usual non answer like engaging me any longer will change the fact you are still talking out of your behind.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 03:44:31