monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

You keep demonstrating selective blindness with your "No one on the Democrat side has..." The last time it was the silly claim that no one on your side uses juvenile monikers like "Demokkkrat"

It seems that claims start of as silly, and then become more and more believable.

How so, I can easily point out the use of juvenile monikers by people on your side: Repukes, tRump. President Plump etc

Half the stuff peddled at Infowars was taken for a fact by the followers, and that is in my opinion a conservative estimate. Furthermore, dismissing a claim as silly is all well and good, and within your right, but I take offense at the idea of being identified with the KKK.

You need to toughen your skin. There is only one person in this forum who uses terms like Demokkkrats and no one takes him very seriously. Besides you're not a Democrat. You don't even live in the US. And, if you do some research you will find that there were at one time ties between the KKK and the Democrat party.

Besides, this is more than a silly claim. I hear the call to outlaw the democratic party more and more these days, and with the current president, anything is possible.

More and more? You must spend a lot of time on fringe websites. As for anything being possible with Trump as president, it seems you've decided to double down on silly claims. The Democrat Party is not going to be outlawed, and Trump isn't going to install himself as Dictator. He may push the boundaries of his authority, but at one time or another, all presidents do. Obama did.

Quote:

We can and will argue all day which tribe is the worst, but your obvious tendency to want to portray yours as without fault or flaw is silly.

Don't put words in my mouth. I will never claim the democrats are innocent, or ar without flaw or fault. That is how you choose to interpret this. There's plenty of deplorable bad behavior on both sides of the political spectrum.

And yet you keep making these statements about how it only Republicans or conservatives who do this or that

Quote:

Oralloy keeps advancing the foolish notion of outlawing the Democrat party, likely because he knows it's guaranteed to get a rise out of you and others. He's done it so many times, it's really hard to believe anyone responds to it still.

Funny, how what is trivial to one can come across as threatening to another.

It is very funny that you might feel threatened by Oralloy.

Quote:

In any case, he is one person in a tiny internet discussion forum and not a spokesman for any organization or cause.

Is this you making the case oralloy is the only person to say this? Hmm?
http://www.politicaljack.com/threads/should-the-democratic-party-be-banned.104532/
https://answers.yahoo.com/qu<br /> estion/index?qid=20120212110210AAfdXPe
https://spectator.org/is-it-time-to-ban-the-democratic-party/

I didn't have to check out these links to know that these folks are not spokespersons for serious organizations or causes either. There has and always be a fringe of extremists out there. Thanks to the internet their voices have been amplified, but unitl you start hearing elected officials repeating this nonsense, you need not worry.

Quote:

Somewhere out there I'm sure we could find at least one person arguing for outlawing the Republican party.

Yes, of course. I searched for this as well, and found some links, although noticeably less so.

Quote:

So what? When we hear people with power and influence advancing such notions, that will be the time for concern.

People in power, especially in countries where the population can vote, tend to try and find out the opinion of said population. If enough people repeat this, there's bound to be someone in a position of power to endorse it. There used to be a time I would laugh such a preposterous idea away, but these past two years have opened my eyes to the depths people in power, or people desiring power, will sink to.

But there hasn't been so you can untwist your knickers. If you've only just learned that people will do almost anything to gain or retain power (like "discovering" thousands of uncounted votes; all for their candidate), you lived a sheltered life.

Quote:

BTW who in this forum has suggested something worse than outlawing the Democrat party and what was it? Lining all Democrats up in front of a firing squad?

You seriously ask me to point this out, when you start your post by calling my claims silly?

Yes I do. You made the claim. You should be able to back it up.

DOJ’S NEW LEADER Says He’d Do To Hillary What Sessions Didn’t Do!

According to FBI Director James Comey’s statement on Tuesday, former secretary of State Hillary Clinton could have been charged with violating several different code sections, and he detailed the evidence that supports bringing criminal charges.

Yet, Director Comey’s judgment was that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring the case. I disagree. I believe myself to have been a reasonable prosecutor, and when the facts and evidence show a criminal violation has been committed, the individuals involved should not dictate whether the case is prosecuted…

…A reasonable prosecutor may ask, if on numerous occasions, an unknown State Department employee had taken top secret information from a secured system, emailed that information on a Gmail account, and stored the information on a personal server for years, would that individual be prosecuted? I believe they would

Amidst brewing international consternation, Trump was criticised in harsh terms by Winston Churchill’s grandson, Nicholas Soames, who tweeted: “They died with their face to the foe and that pathetic inadequate @realDonaldTrump couldn’t even defy the weather to pay his respects to The Fallen #hesnotfittorepresenthisgreatcountry.”

More than 200 people have now died in the latest outbreak of Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo, according to health officials.

About half the victims were from Beni, a city of 800,000 in the North Kivu region, the national health authority said.

A vaccination programme has so far inoculated about 25,000 people.

However, health minister Oly Ilunga said armed rebels were continuing to harass medical teams.

In September, vaccinations were suspended in Beni when a rebel group launched an attack that lasted several hours.

Congo has suffered from years of civil war and political upheaval.

The current outbreak of Ebola, which began in July, is the 10th to hit the country since 1976. The virus is spread via small amounts of bodily fluid and infection often proves fatal.

In its latest update, the health ministry said 291 cases had been confirmed and 201 deaths had been recorded.

UN peacekeepers in the country have called on armed groups not to hinder medical workers fighting the disease.

Mr Ilunga said, on Friday, that teams had faced "threats, physical assaults, repeated destruction of their equipment and kidnapping".

"Two of our colleagues in the Rapid Response Medical Unit have even lost their lives in an attack," he added.

Last week, the World Health Organization's director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said the lack of security was posing the greatest challenge in countering the current epidemic.

How so, I can easily point out the use of juvenile monikers by people on your side: Repukes, tRump. President Plump etc

You need to toughen your skin. There is only one person in this forum who uses terms like Demokkkrats and no one takes him very seriously.

More and more? You must spend a lot of time on fringe websites. As for anything being possible with Trump as president, it seems you've decided to double down on silly claims. The Democrat Party is not going to be outlawed, and Trump isn't going to install himself as Dictator. He may push the boundaries of his authority, but at one time or another, all presidents do. Obama did.

And yet you keep making these statements about how it only Republicans or conservatives who do this or that

It is very funny that you might feel threatened by Oralloy.

I didn't have to check out these links to know that these folks are not spokespersons for serious organizations or causes either. There has and always be a fringe of extremists out there. Thanks to the internet their voices have been amplified, but unitl you start hearing elected officials repeating this nonsense, you need not worry.

But there hasn't been so you can untwist your knickers. If you've only just learned that people will do almost anything to gain or retain power (like "discovering" thousands of uncounted votes; all for their candidate), you lived a sheltered life.

Yes I do. You made the claim. You should be able to back it up.

the other is an implication that the democrats are actually the kkk,

The intern was in over her head and probably negatively effected by the really negative vibes coming from Acosta and #45. Whoever supervises her should not have let her try to get involved. That is a disciplinary matter for whoever manages the interns.