@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote Blickers:
Quote: when an official with security clearance leaves his official position he also leaves behind his security clearance except when he has to testify in court. Then, he is allowed to consult his own papers that he had when he had security clearance.
Revoking his security clearance entirely means that he no longer can go back to consult his old papers, so his effectiveness as a witness is largely inhibited. In that way, Brennan is being silenced.
Quote Finn:
Quote:Man are you in tune with the Resistance Talking Points.
It's amazing how many dimwits across the internet have come up with this bullshit argument all on their own.
Actually, I didn't come up with it all my own, I found out about an ex-high government official having his security clearance routinely re-instated for access to his own papers when giving testimony from a TV discussion.
Are you saying this is not true?
And if it is true, then you have no basis for complaining about the post.
Except to fulfill your compulsion to reply to factual posts with mere expressions of rancor. But then, with your tribe, rancor is the whole point.
