192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 09:54 am
@Blickers,
Quote:
And the Russians absolutely did help the Greens in 2016.

How? Is this the next Mueller investigation? Laughing Laughing Laughing
ehBeth
 
  2  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 09:59 am
@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:
And the Russians absolutely did help the Greens in 2016.


if they did, they weren't much use

didn't even get the Greens close to the numbers they had under Ralph Nader (at the presidential level)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Party_of_the_United_States
Blickers
 
  5  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 09:59 am
@coldjoint,
Gave the reference to the Russians helping Jill Stein on the last page. Here's the post. Source Start reading the replies already made to you and stop demanding new info when you already were given that info.
Blickers
 
  2  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:06 am
@ehBeth,
Quote ehBeth on Russians helping Greens:
Quote:
if they did, they weren't much use

didn't even get the Greens close to the numbers they had under Ralph Nader (at the presidential level)

You would probably have to go through a state-by-state analysis of how many votes the Greens got in each state, figure an 80% - 20% Democratic over Republican split for second choice, and see how it plays out electorally. It's possible that it might have made the difference.

At any rate, it is a moot point in 2016 since Gary Johnson ran on the Libertarian ticket and got several times the votes that the Greens' Jill Stein did. And most of Gary Johnson's voters were likely much more sympathetic to Trump than Hillary. Third or fourth parties did not make the difference in 2016. They did in 2000.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Blickers
 
  5  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:14 am
@coldjoint,
The indictment said the Russians did help the Greens. That's not supposition. Go look for the 37 pages yourself, it will do you good to escape from the right wing media bubble you've surrounded yourself with.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:29 am
@Blickers,
Quote:
Go look for the 37 pages yourself,

Why should I look for what you consider good enough to say, but not to prove? It is just better to ignore it like you would another turd on top of a pile of ****.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:37 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:
you can use social media any damn way you like


turns out this isn't the case

(interesting re-read of a few pages back there)
ehBeth
 
  5  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:42 am
@Blickers,
kind of funny

google Mueller + 37 and it takes you right to the justice.gov document

Builder posted the link in this thread back in February - if anyone was interested in the indictment, they could have read it any time since
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:42 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
turns out this isn't the case

You are finally right about something. Conservatives can not use social media like they want. They are being censored or shadow banned. It shows you and other Leftists have technocrats controlling the messages allowed. It also shows your arguments do not hold up when questioned. That is why questions and posts go POOF.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:52 am
Quote:
At least 29 children have been killed and 30 wounded in a Saudi-led coalition air strike in Yemen, the International Committee of the Red Cross says.

The children were travelling on a bus that was hit at a market in Dahyan, in the northern province of Saada.

The health ministry run by the rebel Houthi movement said put the death toll at 43, and said 61 people were wounded.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-45128367
ehBeth
 
  4  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:56 am
@izzythepush,
Thank #45 for being soft on Saudi Arabia. So fragile.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 10:58 am
@ehBeth,
I think soft is putting it mildly. SA is setting Trump's policy in the ME. This is all linked to sanctions on Iran.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 11:03 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Thank #45 for being soft on Saudi Arabia. So fragile

https://secure.i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01381/obama_bow_1381505c.jpg
Let me know when Trump gives over 1 billion dollars in cash to Iran, or Saudi Arabia..
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 11:04 am
@izzythepush,
yup. which links back to Kushner/Israel/Russian mob $$$
Below viewing threshold (view)
izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 11:13 am
@ehBeth,
Petrodollars and arms deals.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
izzythepush
 
  1  
Thu 9 Aug, 2018 11:42 am
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 04:49:05