192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 06:18 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:
I’m actively boycotting all American made products until three new tariffs are dropped

Oh Oh! There goes the economy. Laughing Laughing Laughing
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 06:49 pm
Quote:
Retired Colonel Wonders Why Hillary Was Left Off Potential Revoked Clearance List

A good question. She could spill her drink and lose even more information than she has already put out there through her server.
Quote:
“Frankly, I was shocked that Hillary, the chief culprit, was omitted,” retired Col. James Williamson told The Daily Caller News Foundation. Williamson, who was in special operations for 30 years and has held a top-level security since 1982, is president of OPSEC, a nonpartisan organization representing retired special forces and intelligence community officials. (Daily Caller)


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiezehnder/2018/07/25/clinton-not-on-wh-list-to-revoke-security-clearance-n2503680
layman
 
  -3  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 06:50 pm
@coldjoint,
No more watermelon for Ma, eh?

He must be subsisting on imported Chinese rice.
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 06:54 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Retired Colonel Wonders Why Hillary Was Left Off Potential Revoked Clearance List


Quote:
“Frankly, I was shocked that Hillary, the chief culprit, was omitted,” retired Col. James Williamson told The Daily Caller


That skank had no damn business anywhere near classified information while she was in office. Don't tell me she still has access now.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 07:17 pm
@layman,
Quote:
That skank had no damn business anywhere near classified information while she was in office.

She seems to be untouchable, in more than one way. Legally is one of them. Why?, is what people want an answer to.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 07:37 pm
@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:
That's because Clinton knew how democracy really works, which is that when an appointment is absolutely necessary to keep something from shutting down, the President clears it with the other party first so the appointment sails through.

The way it works is, the President says to the opposing majority party behind the scenes: "I have two candidates, one you'll be able to live with a lot better than the other. If you agree to vote for the one you'll like better, I'll nominate him or her. Otherwise, I'll nominate the one you'll like a lot less". Then the opposing majority party votes for the nominee they'll like more because they realize that if the position is going to be filled, that nominee is the best they are going to do.

That's how the Federal government has always functioned when the President was of one party and the Senate was of the other party. That's how it functioned under Clinton. If Bush 43 decided not to use that strategy to prevent the FEC was lacking a quorum, that's on him.
The Republicans didn't see it that way.

Blickers wrote:
Both Bush 43 and Clinton had a similar number of their appointments rejected.
Do you have numbers for nominees blocked in 2007-2008, and numbers for blockages during the Clinton Administration?
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 07:57 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
That path does not lead anywhere near his removal.

When you look at the possible results this amounts to no more than gossip and character assassination. Food of the Gods.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 08:13 pm
Quote:
Europe blinks. America wins. Trump shines.

Quote:
"President Donald Trump and European Union officials appeared to step back from a trade war on Wednesday as they struck a deal to work toward 'zero' tariffs, barriers and subsidies," the Guardian reported.

From the Guardian, no less.
http://donsurber.blogspot.com/2018/07/europe-blinks-america-wins-trump-shines.html?spref=tw
layman
 
  -4  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 08:14 pm
I don't know who Strzok and his homeys paid insurance premiums to, but I do know that they got completely ******* ripped off, eh? Like, BIGTIME, ya know?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 10:48 pm
Ya aint gunna weasel outta this one, weasel:

Quote:
House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against Rosenstein

The impeachment articles accuse Rosenstein of intentionally withholding documents and information from Congress, failure to comply with congressional subpoenas and abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

"For nine months, we've asked for documents, and that's all we want," Meadows said. "Not only have subpoenas been ignored, but information has been hidden, efforts have been stonewalled."

"We've caught the Department of Justice hiding information, redacting information that they should not have redacted," Jordan charged, adding that Rosenstein had attempted to intimidate House staffers with subpoenas.

"We're tired of the Justice Department giving us the finger," Jordan added. "The American people are sick of it."


Ya like stonewallin, eh, Roddy-boy? You can look at plenty of them once you're in the Hardrock Hotel.



Below viewing threshold (view)
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 11:03 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
From the Guardian, no less.
The Guardian reports that Trump and Juncker stepped back from a trade war, struck a deal to work towards "zero" tariffs, barriers and subsidies, but were short of detail.


Juncker has managed what many had failed before him - including Macron and Merkel.
The question is, what is behind this U-turn by Trump?
Have the targeted punitive tariffs imposed by Europeans on American products had any effect? Or is it just usual Trumpism, can be changed with the next tweet today?
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 11:44 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
https://i.imgur.com/lJZVJFcl.jpg
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Wed 25 Jul, 2018 11:55 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
More gossip.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Thu 26 Jul, 2018 12:02 am
@blatham,
Bump
izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 26 Jul, 2018 01:25 am
Quote:
Republicans have launched a bid to remove the Department of Justice official overseeing the Russia inquiry dogging Donald Trump's presidency.

House of Representatives conservatives have filed articles of impeachment in an effort to oust Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

The articles were introduced by Representatives Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan, who accuse him of stonewalling their requests for information.

Mr Rosenstein denies the accusations.

The articles of impeachment, which were filed on Wednesday evening, criticise Mr Rosenstein for allegedly failing to comply with requests for documents relating to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

"Rod Rosenstein has been in charge of the Department of Justice as the agency has made every effort to obstruct legitimate attempts of congressional oversight," Mr Meadows said in a statement.

Mr Rosenstein has overseen the investigation since Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself last year.

Impeachment would have to be approved by a majority in the House and backed by two-thirds of the US Senate to convict Mr Rosenstein, which makes the plan a long shot.

Within weeks of becoming deputy attorney general in April 2017, Mr Rosenstein found himself in controversy after a memo he wrote was cited as the reason for President Trump's decision to fire FBI chief James Comey, who was investigating Russia's alleged interference in the 2016 US elections.

Mr Rosenstein then appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel to take over the inquiry.

Earlier this month, the Department of Justice charged 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democratic officials during the 2016 vote.

Although Mr Rosenstein has said there is no evidence they "altered the vote count or changed any election result", the announcement came just before Mr Trump's controversial summit with President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-44962120
farmerman
 
  3  
Thu 26 Jul, 2018 05:17 am
@izzythepush,
weve begun huge agriculture project in order to become a full-fledged banana based economy bfore Trump leaves office
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 11:03:33