monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

.......did you think the democrats denied Garland?

they all must be rino's

There's still time to head to Canada, know what I'm sayin?

Why is the Media Party hiding the Toronto mass shooter's links to Muslim terrorism?

Police quickly identified him, saying he was “known to police”. That, and his age, 29, was immediately published — but authorities declined to give his name. Why?

I suppose I'm asking you to do my own research, but can you pinpoint the minutes and seconds when he gets to the funny part. I think I missed it.

In fact, the new court will strike down every cheese-eating "law" that comes their way, even if it was approved by the voters' representatives. Not because they don't like it, but because, 9 times out of 10, that **** is unconstitutional.

There's still time to head to Canada, know what I'm sayin?

Liberal 9th Circuit backs right to carry firearms in public

It’s the second time this month that the three-judge panel issued a pro-Second Amendment decision, after backing a lower court’s decision last week to suspend California’s ban on the possession of large magazines.

The liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals endorsed the right of individuals to carry firearms in public in a ruling Tuesday, striking down a lower court argument that the Constitution only protects that right at home.

“Analyzing the text of the Second Amendment and reviewing the relevant history, including founding-era treatises and nineteenth century case law, the panel stated that it was unpersuaded by the county’s and the state’s argument that the Second Amendment only has force within the home,” the ruling states.

Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain wrote in his opinion that “for better or for worse, the Second Amendment does protect a right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense.”

Based in San Francisco, the Ninth Circuit has a reputation for being one of the nation's most liberal courts. Critics have branded the court the “Nutty 9th” or the “9th Circus,” in part because many of its rulings have been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court. This includes an infamous 2002 ruling that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional because of its use of the phrase “under God.”

roger wrote:

I suppose I'm asking you to do my own research, but can you pinpoint the minutes and seconds when he gets to the funny part. I think I missed it.

Don't run around lyin to me, now, OK, Rog? I happen to know for a stone-cold fact that you have a better sense of humor than that.

There will soon be 7 staunch conservative Justices on the Supreme Court, a condition that will last for decades.

And the Republicans blocked just as many nominees of Bill Clinton's before that.

The guy's a traitor in my book. As in: he's pretending to work for the US but takes his orders from Russia.

glitterbag wrote:

.......did you think the democrats denied Garland?

No. I think Democrats blocked Bush's nominees in 2007 and 2008.

Republicans blocking Merrick Garland was revenge for this.

Voting has begun in Pakistan after an election campaign overshadowed by concerns of manipulation and violence.

Nearly 106 million people are registered to vote for members of the lower house of parliament and four provincial assemblies.

Election violence has already broken out, with at least 15 reported dead in a blast in the city of Quetta.

Separately at least one person was killed as violence erupted among party workers in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The PTI party of former star cricketer Imran Khan is hoping to beat ex-leader Nawaz Sharif's PML-N.

The Human Rights Commission says there have been "blatant" attempts to manipulate the polls.

More than 370,000 troops are deployed to secure the ballot. Votes will be cast for 272 National Assembly seats that are directly contestable.

Pakistan is no stranger to political turmoil and the last few months have proved no exception. The man who won the last election is watching this contest from prison, after a scandal stemming from the Panama Papers led to Mr Sharif being jailed for corruption.

Bush nominated a women who had never tried a case in court and then he withdrew the nomination.......so the republicans blocked a republican they said earlier they thought would be terrific??????

Let's face it, when Obama took suggestions from the republicans they still blocked every single thing because they could not abide that the American people elected a black man to be president, not only that, he was reelected.

It so offended our closet racists, they catapulted a mysoginist, narcissist, nationalist, profiteer, scam artist and dead beat who skips paying his bills into the position.