156
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 03:04 am
A damn Mexican, eh?

Quote:
Mexican national gets prison time for faking citizenship, stealing $350G in benefits

Andres Avelino Anduaga, a Mexican national who impersonated an American citizen for more than 30 years, was sentenced to 37 months in federal prison for stealing more than $350,000 in government benefits from government agencies.

The report, citing court documents, said in 1980, he used a birth certificate belonging to a U.S. citizen to obtain a California driver’s license and a Social Security card, then used his new false identity to commit a variety of crimes.

He reportedly admitted that he was able to travel freely between the U.S. and Mexico using a passport that he obtained via the same stolen identity he used to defraud public assistance programs.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/16/mexican-national-gets-prison-time-for-faking-citizenship-stealing-350g-in-benefits.html

This is just the kinda thing that the guy who the Democratic Party in California endorsed over Pelosi wanted to make sure continued, eh?

These are NOT Americans. They are Mexican citizens who pledge their alliance to a foreign country.

layman
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 03:14 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
This is just the kinda thing that the guy who the Democratic Party in California endorsed over Pelosi wanted to make sure continued, eh?


This guy:

Quote:
LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — A Los Angeles lawmaker leading the fight to make California a so-called “sanctuary state” has suggested half of his family would be deported for using falsified Social Security cards and other fake identification.

California Senate Leader Kevin de Leon made the claims during testimony before the Senate’s Public Safety Committee for SB54, a bill introduced by De Leon that would create a statewide sanctuary for immigrants living in the country illegally.

"Half of my family would be eligible for deportation under the executive order, because they got a false social security card, they got a false identification, they got a false driver’s license prior to us passing AB 60, they got a false green card, and anyone who has family members who are undocumented knows that almost entirely everybody has secured some sort of false identification.”


https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2017/02/06/senate-leader-half-of-my-family-eligible-for-deportation-under-trump-order/

Needless to say, his bill passed easily. As did his AB 60 bill, which gave illegals the right to get a driver's license and automatically registered to vote. A very popular guy in California, sho nuff.

Hispanics outnumber all other races and ethnic groups in California these days, and are breeding like flies. Their grip on the State gets stronger every year. Soon California will secede and annex itself to Mexico.
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 03:29 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
It creeps me out when...


You were creeped out on the day you were born....
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 03:40 am
@layman,
http://rightwise.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/4954347710971904.jpeg

They learn em young, eh? It appears that someone they knew spoke a little English and made that sign.

gungasnake
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 03:53 am
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/37161459_2122848487928729_5921248270264303616_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=30bbdf9377a56671548bcac3f5e0b175&oe=5BC936C3
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:01 am
@layman,
Most Mexicans believe that we somehow or other stole California from Mexico. That turns out to be total bullshit. Mexico never HAD California. They were never able to get past the Apaches and Comanches in order to get TO California via land so that by the middle 1800s, all they had to show for their 300 year head start in California was a handful of missions which had to be supplied by ships coming around South America.If they had ever done anything with California, there is no way in the world that Anglos would have been able to simply walk into the place in the 1840s.

Most modern people have no idea how big a deal the Comanches were in the 18th and 19th centuries. Comanches were the absolute bottom of the Native American totem pole in the ages before horses were reintroduced to the Americas. But of all the Native American groups which managed to domesticate wild Mustangs and adapt themselves to cavalry operations, the Comanches did by far the best job. By the turn of the 18th century they were being described as the best light cavalry in the world.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003KN3MDG/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:04 am
@gungasnake,
London isn't independent but part of the UK.
The criminal law there is that of England & Wales.

Robinson ... in 2013, he was jailed for 10 months for entering the US with a fake passport, having pleaded guilty to possession of a false identity document with improper intention. (Robinson had been unable to legally enter the country because of multiple drug convictions, and so used a friend’s passport in the name of Andrew McMaster to get to New York.)

Glad, your changed your opinion about illegal immigrants!
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:07 am
Sooner or later, the United States will have to retake California. We cannot just let the place go, we would have to build a wall around the place entirely similar to the wall in Game of Thrones. And, the way things are going now, the place is headed towards some kind of an Old Testament scale catastrophe.
layman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:16 am
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:

Most Mexicans believe that we somehow or other stole California from Mexico. That turns out to be total bullshit. Mexico never HAD California. They were never able to get past the Apaches and Comanches in order to get TO California via land so that by the middle 1800s, all they had to show for their 300 year head start in California was a handful of missions which had to be supplied by ships coming around South America.If they had ever done anything with California, there is no way in the world that Anglos would have been able to simply walk into the place in the 1840s.

Most modern people have no idea how big a deal the Comanches were in the 18th and 19th centuries. Comanches were the absolute bottom of the Native American totem pole in the ages before horses were reintroduced to the Americas. But of all the Native American groups which managed to domesticate wild Mustangs and adapt themselves to cavalry operations, the Comanches did by far the best job. By the turn of the 18th century they were being described as the best light cavalry in the world.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003KN3MDG/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1


All true. In fact Mexico had only a very tenuous grip on land far south of the Rio Grande--The Commanches were constantly raiding and burning villages far into what is now Mexico. Many feared they would take over Mexico City.

We should have learned from Mexico. Hoping to create a barrier from the Commanches in Texas, they started sponsoring immigration to there by Americans. Within a few years, Americans, with loyalties to the USA, had them outnumbered and overthrew the Mexican "government" (such as it was) in Texas and took over the joint.

Even today, polls show that Mexicans hate "gringos." 75-80% of them say that any Mexican living in the US owes his loyalty to Mexico. Most of the rest "aren't sure." That's the pool the illegal immigrants are coming from.
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:37 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
Even today, polls show that Mexicans hate "gringos." 75-80% of them say that any Mexican living in the US owes his loyalty to Mexico. Most of the rest "aren't sure." That's the pool the illegal immigrants are coming from.


And legal immigrants, I should add. Cheese-eaters seem to think that issuing a green card to some Mexican alien magically turns them into loyal "Americans." Fraid not. Most of them are here to make money to send back to Mexico, while soaking the welfare system here. They have about as much "love" for Americans as slaves in the south did for the plantation owners who kept them fed.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:40 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMpcmtneBa0

0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:43 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
The Commanches were constantly raiding and burning villages far into what is now Mexico. Many feared they would take over Mexico City.
Certainly such didn't happen in the USA - stories about the "non-treaty Indians" are fake, I suppose? And all that written about Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse etc happened earlier?
layman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:46 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

layman wrote:
The Commanches were constantly raiding and burning villages far into what is now Mexico. Many feared they would take over Mexico City.
Certainly such didn't happen in the USA - stories about the "non-treaty Indians" are fake, I suppose? And all that written about Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse etc happened earlier?


What the hell are you even talking about, Walt?
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:49 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
What the hell are you even talking about, Walt?
American history.
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:51 am
@layman,
The thing which finally gave Anglos any sort of an edge over the Comanche was the Colt and later Walker-Colt revolver. That reversed the edge which the Comanche had previously had with his bow versus the single shot firearms which European settlers and their militaries were using in the 18th and 19th centuries. We would still be waiting for Spain or Mexico to invent something like that.....

Note also that the Comanche most often struck on horseback and at night so that any edge in accuracy which a Kentucky rifle or anything like that might have had against people using bows and arrows would have been minimized. That is why the book I mentioned takes the name "Empire of the Summer Moon". Many older Texans even today will remember their grandparents using the term "Comanche Moon", which meant any particularly bright full moon under which Comanches could gallop into some town, burn it down, and rape and kill everybody.
layman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:56 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

layman wrote:
What the hell are you even talking about, Walt?
American history.


Yeah? What about it? Do you have any point?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:58 am
@gungasnake,
Yeah, and the tortures the Commanches devised made putting some guy's head in a vise look like a picnic. Ant they didn't do it to extract information or any other benefit. They did it strictly for fun. They were universally feared throughout the southwest and in Mexico.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 05:03 am
Finland’s biggest newspaper has set up these brilliant billboards all around Helsinki for Trump and Putin.

https://i.imgur.com/d2h08T5m.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/FZ8LshRm.jpg
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 05:08 am
@layman,
Quote:
S C Gwynne, author of Empire Of The Summer Moon about the rise and fall of the Comanche, says simply: ‘No tribe in the history of the Spanish, French, Mexican, Texan, and American occupations of this land had ever caused so much havoc and death. None was even a close second.’

He refers to the ‘demonic immorality’ of Comanche attacks on white settlers, the way in which torture, killings and gang-rapes were routine. ‘The logic of Comanche raids was straightforward,’ he explains.

One by one, the children and young women were pegged out naked beside the camp fire,’ according to a contemporary account. ‘They were skinned, sliced, and horribly mutilated, and finally burned alive by vengeful women determined to wring the last shriek and convulsion from their agonised bodies. Matilda Lockhart’s six-year-old sister was among these unfortunates who died screaming under the high plains moon.’

Not only were the Comanche specialists in torture, they were also the most ferocious and successful warriors — indeed, they become known as ‘Lords of the Plains’.

They were as imperialist and genocidal as the white settlers who eventually vanquished them. They terrorised Mexico and brought the expansion of Spanish colonisation of America to a halt. Settlers in Texas were utterly terrified of the Comanche, who would travel almost a thousand miles to slaughter a single white family.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396760/How-Comanche-Indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive.html

That kinda "American History," Walt?
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 05:11 am
@glitterbag,
Quote:
All of us girls had to wear a ribbon stating “Welcome to Baltimore”...


So you live in Baltimore and want to talk about Arkansas as if that place had any kind of a problem??

I mean, Baltimore's the one place I normally ever go where I would like to be carrying a pistol on general principles. I mean, at least in daylight, nothing I ever see in Washington DC or New York really frightens me very much, the people in those places at least look as if they came from this PLANET. Nobody could say the same thing for Baltimore. You see people walking down the sidewalk in real life with dead looks on their faces like the description of zombies in the old Bob hope movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOhcbtkCHtE

Nor does that have anything to do with race or racism; you see the same stupid look on the faces of people of all colors in that place.

You see nice older houses which would sell for 90,000 to a couple or several hundred thousand dollars in any decently run town or city which, in Baltimore, sell for, what, $12,000, $20,000??

There is even a part of Baltimore called "Pig Town", to for reasons which, probably, should be fairly obvious.

And you want to talk about Arkansas??


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.24 seconds on 10/14/2019 at 02:01:31