192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 06:26 am
@oralloy,
Actually, you should ask ambassador (ret) James D. Melville why he thinks, such doesn't work with "Foreign Service Officer’s DNA".
revelette1
 
  5  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 07:47 am
Quote:
Trump thought he was talking to a U.S. Senator. Instead, it was a prank caller with a podcast.

Wednesday night, as President Trump made his way to Wisconsin and then Washington, D.C. following a rally in North Dakota, he returned a phone call from Democratic New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez. For several minutes, the two lawmakers discussed Trump’s abusive child separation policy, as well as his plans to fill Justice Anthony Kennedy’s soon-to-be-vacant seat on the Supreme Court.

Such conversations are, for good reason, private. And yet, you can listen to the entire exchange below for yourself. Why? Because the president of the United States, using state-of-the-art military equipment aboard the most secure airplane in the known universe, instead returned the phone call of a prankster with a podcast.

John Melendez — better known as “Stuttering John” to longtime fans of The Howard Stern Show, where he worked in various on and off-air capacities for more than 15 years — decided he would try to get Trump on the phone during a recent episode of his new podcast. As you might expect from a 90’s-era shock jock based in New York City, Melendez has a history with the Trump family, and recounted past instances of phoning the self-proclaimed billionaire for casual chitchat.

fter a series of conversations with various White House phone operators and support staff — first using his own name, then using pseudonyms like John Sterling (the New York Yankees’ radio play-by-play guy) and Sean Moore (a portmanteau of Sean Connery and Roger Moore) to pose as an aide from Sen. Menendez’s office — Melendez got through to a staff member, who informed him that Trump was in the middle of giving a speech, but would call back afterward.

After hanging up, Melendez was giddy he had gotten even that far without getting his cover blown. And in most White Houses, which employ a staff competent enough to Google the names of a U.S. senator’s office staff, that’s where the story might have ended.

But this White House employs the likes of Jared Kushner, who, according to a source inside the White House, was reportedly responsible for routing not-Menendez’s call directly to the president, bypassing the Office of Legislative Affairs, which would normally handle communications between lawmakers and the Executive Branch. That is how, minutes later, Trump dialed Melendez’s cell phone from Air Force One, and began talking to a person he believed to be Sen. Menendez himself.


More at TP


Who was it who used to say "Trump he ain't no Chump?" Right.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  1  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 08:20 am
Quote:
U.S. Circuit Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy who is viewed as one of the leading contenders to replace him, has argued that presidents should not be distracted by civil lawsuits, criminal investigations or even questions from a prosecutor or defense attorney while in office.

Kavanaugh had direct personal experience that informed his 2009 article for the Minnesota Law Review: He helped investigate President Bill Clinton as part of independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr’s team and then served for five years as a close aide to President George W. Bush.

Having observed the weighty issues that can consume a president, Kavanaugh wrote, the nation’s chief executive should be exempt from “time-consuming and distracting” lawsuits and investigations, which “would ill serve the public interest, especially in times of financial or national security crisis.”

If a president were truly malevolent, Kavanaugh wrote, he could always be impeached.

Kavanaugh’s position that presidents should be free of such legal inquiries until after they leave office puts him on the record regarding a topic of intense interest to Trump — and could be a central focus of his confirmation hearing if Kavanaugh were nominated to succeed Kennedy, legal experts said.

The president is facing several legal challenges, including a civil defamation lawsuit filed by Summer Zervos, a former contestant on his reality show, “The Apprentice,” who has said Trump groped her. Earlier this month, New York’s highest court rejected Trump’s attempt to halt discovery in the suit, paving the way for the president to be deposed.

At the same time, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III is in a standoff with Trump’s lawyers over his request to interview the president for his investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 campaign — a fight that could end up before the Supreme Court.

If Kavanaugh is the nominee, “this will be a very central topic of questions from members of the Senate,” said Stephen Vladeck, professor of constitutional law at the University of Texas School of Law. “He is a staunch defender of executive prerogative. The question is just how far he would go in cases really testing whether there is any limit to that theory.”


More at WP
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 08:30 am
Many said that North Korea gained the most out of the summit - they only had to move the production of fuel for nuclear weapons at multiple secret sites, increased it even, if you believe what has been said, in recent months ...
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 08:39 am
If NATO was ever meant to protect Europe from invasion, then it has quite obviously, miserably failed.

https://voiceofeurope.com
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 08:51 am
@Walter Hinteler,
No telling what Russia will gain with the Trump/Putin summit. Bad times.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 10:00 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Many said

What is "Many's" first name?
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 10:03 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
No telling what Russia will gain with the Trump/Putin summit.


You have no idea what you are talking about. Exactly what does "no telling" mean? It sounds like you have no idea. You just have to say something negative, that is all, and it is nothing new.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 10:21 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
What is "Many's" first name?
It's not worth telling you - since years you don't get mine, though it's in front of you.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 10:35 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
It's not worth telling you

It is not worth telling anyone, but that has never stopped you.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 10:46 am
Quote:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez BUSTED: Working “Girl from the Bronx” Grew Up in Wealthy Neighborhood[/quote]
They all lie. Some get caught. She has been caught.
Quote:
Around the age of five, Alexandria’s architect father Sergio Ocasio moved the family from the “planned community” of Parkchester in the Bronx to a home in Yorktown Heights, a wealthy suburb in Westchester County. The New York Times describes her childhood home as “a modest two-bedroom house on a quiet street.” In a 1999 profile of the area, when Ocasio-Cortez would have been ten years old, the Times lauded Yorktown Heights’ “diversity of housing in a scenic setting” – complete with two golf courses.



Westchester County – which the Washington Post, in a glowing profile on Ocasio-Cortez, describes as only “middle class” – ranks #8 in the nation for the counties with the “highest average incomes among the wealthiest one percent of residents.” According to the Economic Policy Institute, the county’s average annual income of the top one percent is a staggering $4,326,049.

Yorktown Heights, specifically, offers a sharp contrast from Bronx living. According to USA.com, the town’s population is 81 percent white, and median household income is $96,413 – nearly double the average for both New York state and the nation, according to data from 2010-2014.

Does this sound like a woman that grew up with a “working class” family? I’d venture a guess that an architect father did not struggle to make ends meet in a wealthy suburb.

There is nothing wrong with a Father who does his best to provide for his family. But Bronx residents are being grossly misled.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2018/06/30/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-busted-working-girl-from-the-bronx-grew-up-in-wealthy-neighborhood/
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 10:50 am
@revelette1,
From a dw-opinion
Quote:
What will Donald Trump be able to achieve at a summit with Vladimir Putin? Little. Russia will by no means withdraw from Crimea. It will continue to support rebels in eastern Ukraine, as well as President Bashar Assad and Iranian troops in Syria. Trump will not be able to much, if anything, when it comes to Putin's "Russia first" policy.

The Kremlin leader, on the other hand, can expect a great deal from a Russian-American summit. When he and Trump meet to talk about international issues, TV images the world over will covey the same message: two politicians negotiating on an equal footing. Putin will score poins with this summit, with or without results.
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 11:08 am
@Walter Hinteler,
What the hell has Germany ever done to protect the freedom and independence of Ukraine, or, for that matter, to eject Putin from Crimea?

Germany is Putin's prime facilitator in Europe, even to the extent of championing the joint construction of an oil pipeline under the Baltic to enable Russian gas exports to bypass Byelorussia and Poland .

Major league hypocrisy here.
Below viewing threshold (view)
layman
 
  -2  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 11:14 am
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

What the hell has Germany ever done to protect the freedom and independence of Ukraine, or, for that matter, to eject Putin from Crimea?

Germany is Putin's prime facilitator in Europe, even to the extent of championing the joint construction of an oil pipeline under the Baltic to enable Russian gas exports to bypass Byelorussia and Poland .

Major league hypocrisy here.


You shouldn't oughta run around confusing the poor boy with no facts, George. It just aint no fair, I tells ya!
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 11:25 am
@layman,
Germany has little right to criticize the motives for and presumed content of a meeting with the Russian Leader that hasn't yet occurred. The DW commentator even had the temerity to raise the issue of Putin's support for the Assad regime in Syria. What has Germany ever done to contain the many troubles in the Middle East or the ongoing carnage in Syria? It's frankly difficult to even get Germany, the richest large country in Europe, to live up to its NATO commitments, and even there in its rare support for NATO actions (as in Afghanistan) its soldiers did very little that was constructive (or risky). This stuff frankly pisses me off.
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 11:30 am
Unfortunately, these rallies were organized BEFORE Trump signed his executive order, so now they've had to move the goalposts to "No borders, no nations! Abolish the ICE!" In short, they were forced to reveal their true agenda.

Quote:
The voices of hundreds of thousands of people rang nationwide on Saturday calling for the reunification of hundreds of children separated from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Protesters chanted “shut detention down!” as they marched in New York City’s Foley Square while in El Paso, Texas, hundreds marched toward the Paso Del Norte (Santa Fe) Bridge that crosses into Juarez, Mexico. More than 600 events were planned across the country.

Dallas protest organizer Michelle Wentz says opposition to the policy has seemed to cross political party lines. She called it a "barbaric and inhumane" policy.

Saturday's rallies are getting funding and support from the American Civil Liberties Union, MoveOn.org, the National Domestic Workers Alliance and The Leadership Conference.

Tweeting from New Jersey, Trump said that Democrats "are making a strong push to abolish ICE, one of the smartest, toughest and most spirited law enforcement groups of men and women that I have ever seen." He urged ICE agents to "not worry or lose your spirit." Trump also tweeted on Saturday that he was backing ICE agents and that there was “zero chance” of ICE being abolished.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/06/30/hundreds-thousands-rally-nationwide-for-illegal-immigrant-families-separated-at-border.html



0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  6  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 11:35 am
@georgeob1,
Quote georgeob1:
Quote:
What the hell has Germany ever done to protect the freedom and independence of Ukraine, or, for that matter, to eject Putin from Crimea?

Plenty. From 2014:

U.S. and Europe Set to Toughen Russia Sanctions
By Jack Ewing and Peter Baker
July 28, 2014

FRANKFURT — The United States and Europe put aside their differences and agreed Monday to sharply escalate economic sanctions against Russia amid worries that Moscow is stepping up its intervention in Ukraine and may be setting the stage for an outright invasion.

After months in which European leaders resisted going as far as the Americans, the two sides settled on a package of measures that would target Russia’s financial, energy and military sectors. In some cases, the Europeans may actually leapfrog beyond what the United States has done, forcing Washington to catch up.....

....But the package to be finalized Tuesday would go much further, matching and in some cases exceeding the actions Mr. Obama took on his own this month in blocking access to medium- and long-term American capital markets for some of Russia’s largest and most global banking and energy companies.

The Europeans plan to impose similar capital-market restrictions on Russian state-owned banks as well as an embargo on future sales of arms and to restrict the sale of equipment that can be used for both civilian and military purposes, according to officials briefed on the discussions. They are also considering limits on technology sales to Russia’s oil industry.

Under their own procedures, the Europeans cannot target individual Russian banks the way the Obama administration has, so the capital-market measures will affect all banks that are majority-owned by the Russian state. The Americans would then try to catch up by targeting more Russian banks. Although there would be some gaps between the two moves, officials said they would work to make sure Russia could not slip through them.

American officials were heartened by the agreement, saying it would frustrate efforts by President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to drive a wedge between the United States and its allies. The key to the agreement, they said, was Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, who dropped her past reluctance and pressed for more assertive moves, which forced the French to go along, and that then forced the Italians to give in.
Source
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 11:38 am
@Blickers,
That was four years ago, and it is a rare exception to the usual German policy. Indeed finally getting some, however reluctant, German/European support for this action was quite an achievement on the part of the Obama Administration at the time.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sat 30 Jun, 2018 11:43 am
Take a break, and watch a powerful and truth packed video.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 04:22:20