Paul Manafort: Trump's ex-chair hit with new obstruction of justice charges
Mueller’s office confirms Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik indicted on charges following allegations of witness tampering
Quote:
A federal grand jury handed down new charges Friday against former Donald Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who already faces five felony charges and was accused in court documents Monday of attempted witness tampering in his case.
The latest charges against Manafort came less than four months after his former business associate, Richard Gates III, agreed to cooperate with special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
The government moved to revoke Manafort’s bail on Monday, alleging that he had sought to influence witnesses in his case with contacts by phone and through an encrypted messaging program.
Prosecutors backed up the allegation with Friday’s charges, alleging that Manafort and a Russian-Ukrainian associate, Konstantin Kilimnick, “conspired to corruptly persuade” two unnamed witnesses in the case to alter or cancel planned testimony.
Manafort has doggedly asserted his innocence as prosecutors have released waves of evidence of an alleged scheme by him, Gates and others to launder money they were paid for political consulting work in Ukraine, Europe and elsewhere. The government accuses Manafort of dodging taxes, failing to register as a foreign agent while working in Washington on behalf of foreign governments, and other charges.
Prosecutors assert that Mr. Manafort’s fight included trying to shape the accounts that former business partners offered prosecutors. In court filings this week, they said that starting in late February, Mr. Manafort repeatedly tried to reach the two journalists — with whom he had fallen out of contact until recently — to coordinate their accounts about their work to tamp down international criticism of Mr. Yanukovych for corruption, persecuting rivals and pivoting toward Russia and its president, Vladimir V. Putin. The prosecutors did not name the journalists, but three people familiar with the project identified them as Alan Friedman and Eckart Sager.
Both men fended off the overtures, which included phone calls and encrypted text messages from Mr. Manafort and a longtime associate, whom prosecutors have not named but was identified by people close to Mr. Manafort as Konstantin V. Kilimnik, a former Russian Army linguist who prosecutors claim has ties to Russian intelligence.
Quote:
Instead of engaging, Mr. Friedman and Mr. Sager informed Mr. Mueller’s team of the efforts to reach them, according to prosecutors. Mr. Friedman accused Mr. Manafort of trying to “suborn perjury” by persuading him to lie to investigators, according to a declaration by an F.B.I. agent on the case. Neither Mr. Friedman nor Mr. Sager could be reached for comment.
The prosecutors are arguing that because of these allegations, a federal judge should revise the terms of Mr. Manafort’s bail or even send him to jail while he awaits trial. Mr. Manafort, who posted a $10 million bond and has been confined to his home since October, has until Friday at midnight to respond to the prosecutors’ accusations. His spokesman brushed aside prosecutors’ allegations of witness tampering, but declined to comment on Mr. Manafort’s relationship with Mr. Friedman and Mr. Sager.
They join a growing list of lobbyists, consultants and lawyers who worked on various contracts related to Mr. Yanukovych’s government, political party or supporters and are now cooperating with the government’s prosecution of Mr. Manafort. His associates say he was most stung by the decision of his longtime business partner, Rick Gates, who served as Mr. Trump’s former deputy presidential campaign manager, to cooperate as part of a deal in which he pleaded guilty to financial fraud and lying to investigators.
__
about a decade ago I warned a paralegal I had professional dealings with to be cautious about his contacts with New Russians in a similar line of work. The last time I saw him was in a photo in the paper - being driven away after being arrested. Playing with Russians is not smart.
0 Replies
Sturgis
5
Fri 8 Jun, 2018 01:11 pm
@ehBeth,
Paul Manafort= today's version of Jeb Stuart Magruder.
Mueller= the Devil
Trump=Daniel Webster(except Trump is a president)
0 Replies
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
-6
Fri 8 Jun, 2018 01:35 pm
Quote:
Both men fended off the overtures, which included phone calls and encrypted text messages from Mr. Manafort and a longtime associate, whom prosecutors have not named but was identified by people close to Mr. Manafort as Konstantin V. Kilimnik, a former Russian Army linguist who prosecutors claim has ties to Russian intelligence.
^^^^
your link. This old news. Why rinse and repeat?
Quote:
Why the mainstream media considers confirmation of Kilimnik’s GRU affiliation—which the translator-cum-factotum never concealed—to be a bombshell is something of a mystery. This is just one more thread in the Trump investigation that’s been known for years, yet which the MSM largely punted on investigating seriously before the 2016 election, when it might have mattered. Why a veteran GRU operative was lurking near the heart of the Trump campaign was an important question in the summer of 2016—not the spring of 2018.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky told reporters that Trump doesn’t need advice on pardoning himself.
“He obviously knows that would not be something that he would or should do," McConnell said. "They were having an academic discussion about whether it’s possible. I don’t know the answer to that."
McConnell also signaled support for Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who Trump has repeatedly criticized for recusing himself from the Russia probe. “I hope he’ll remain in the job,” McConnell said.
Most Republicans say there isn’t any evidence yet that Trump did anything illegal or impeachable.
But Graham said the dangling of pardons in the Watergate investigation was part of the impeachment articles considered against President Richard Nixon before he resigned.
Quote:
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, one of many Republicans who voted to convict Clinton in 1999 on a charge of obstruction of justice, didn’t sound impressed when asked about the legal theory a president could not obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer and would be obstructing himself.
“Nobody is above the law. Otherwise we wouldn’t have a system of laws,” Grassley said.
“Nobody is above the law. Otherwise we wouldn’t have a system of laws,” Grassley said.
They all say it, and Killary is still free. It means nothing.
0 Replies
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
-5
Fri 8 Jun, 2018 04:27 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Mueller’s office confirms Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik indicted on charges following allegations of witness tampering
If it was OK for Bill Clinton to do it, it should be OK for the rest of us as well.
0 Replies
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
-5
Fri 8 Jun, 2018 04:28 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, one of many Republicans who voted to convict Clinton in 1999 on a charge of obstruction of justice, didn’t sound impressed when asked about the legal theory a president could not obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer and would be obstructing himself.
“Nobody is above the law. Otherwise we wouldn’t have a system of laws,” Grassley said.
Pointing out that "it is not obstruction when the government decides to stop pursuing an investigation" is not saying that anyone is above the law.
But since he remembers Bill Clinton, he should remember that the Democrats did in fact place him above the law.
The Atlantic Magazine Joins a Long Line of Media Elites Supporting Jihad & Sharia
What is new?
Quote:
In his article, which can be found HERE, Peter Beinhart follows the script of most in the media – he quotes the Center for Security Policy and its publications on matters of sharia and the Muslim Brotherhood’s Jihadi Movement in the U.S., and leaves the reader believing the information is rhetoric or baseless without actually addressing the matter in fact.
Specifically, Mr. Beinart fails to mention sharia is authoritatively derived from the Koran and the example of Islam’s prophet Mohammad.
Mr. Beinart fails to mention that 100% of our enemy self-identifies as “muslims waging jihad to establish an Islamic State under sharia.
Mr. Beinart fails to mention that 100% of all published sharia mandates jihad until the entire world is under sharia and 100% of sharia legally defines “jihad” ONLY as “warfare against non-muslims.”
Mr. Beinart fails to mention that it is obligatory for muslims to follow all aspects of sharia under penalty of death under the Laws of Apostasy in sharia.
Mr. Beinart also fails to mention that the evidence in the largest terrorism financing trial ever successfully prosecuted in American history (US v Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, Dallas 2008) reveals the most prominent Islamic organizations in the United States are – as a matter of fact – part of a defined “movement” led by the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood with the stated objective of waging “Civilization Jihad” to establish an Islamic State (caliphate) under Islamic Law (sharia).
Mr. Beinart fails to mention this is the same objective as Al Qaeda, ISIS, and every other jihadi organization on the planet.
What is new is that Bolton and Fleitz know these things about Islam. I bet they would be glad to tell the press exactly where they got their ideas from. But they would probably be shouted down.
I hope Trump is on the same page.
Quote:
If we analyze Mr. Beinart’s “journalistic” work, he is either demonstrating staggering incompetence as a reporter or is intentionally defending enemies of the United States.
Does Stormy have competition? Stormy did use sex to get what she wanted. Maybe she was an inspiration.
Quote:
NY Times Reporter and Senate Staffer Caught in Sex-for-Leaks Scandal
Quote:
JOURNALISM ETHICS: Ali Watkins, who graduated from Temple University only 4 years ago, was sleeping with one of her sources, a 57-year-old Senate staffer, who was arrested Thursday.
Ryan, Putin: No Evidence 2016 Trump Campaign Colluded with Russia
Quote:
Ryan is doubling down, declaring there is no proof of any collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign and the Kremlin.
“There has been no evidence that there has been any collusion between the Trump campaign and President Trump and Russia. let’s just make that very clear, there is no evidence of collusion,” he stated.
Progressives liked him when he dissed Spygate, how do they like him now?
Putin maintains his stance:
Quote:
At a televised Townhall session, Russian President Vladimir Putin brushed off concerns of so-called collusion as “nonsense” and “something that can only be called a joke.”
They stand to lose an amazing amount of income, going on those states that have already gone down this path. Legal drugs are doing a lot of damage across the nation; would you agree, Roger?