@Walter Hinteler,
The New York Times wrote:WASHINGTON -- President Trump's lawyers have for months quietly waged a campaign to keep the special counsel from trying to force him to answer questions in the investigation into whether he obstructed justice, asserting that he cannot be compelled to testify
Trump has the same Fifth Amendment rights that everyone else does.
The New York Times wrote:and arguing in a confidential letter that he could not possibly have committed obstruction because he has unfettered authority over all federal investigations.
In a brash assertion of presidential power, the 20-page letter -- sent to the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and obtained by The New York Times -- contends that the president cannot illegally obstruct any aspect of the investigation into Russia's election meddling because the Constitution empowers him to, "if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon."
"Brash" for him to assert that he has the normal constitutional powers of the presidency?
The New York Times wrote:Mr. Trump's broad interpretation of executive authority is novel
No it isn't. That has been the clear meaning of the Constitution for the past 230 years.
The only thing that is novel is the liberals' weird claim that he doesn't have these powers.
The New York Times wrote:and is likely to be tested if a court battle ensues over whether he could be ordered to answer questions. It is unclear how that fight, should the case reach that point, would play out. A spokesman for Mr. Mueller declined to comment.
"We don't know what the law is on the intersection between the obstruction statutes and the president exercising his constitutional power to supervise an investigation in the Justice Department," said Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor who oversaw the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel during the Bush administration. "It's an open question."
I predict that the Supreme Court will ignore the liberal gibberish and will issue a straightforward ruling in favor of the Constitution.