@revelette1,
The point of such negotiations is the achievement of a desired outcome; not merely an agreement. As I outlined, we've had agreements with North Korea before involving substantial payments and concessions from us and got nothing from it - certainly none of the reassurances we were given during the negotiations.
Trump's approach, combining severe sanctions and an offer to talk over the conditions for releasing them, is far more likely to deliver a favorable outcome than past, failed strategies.
Kim and his predecessors in North Korea are riding a tiger and they know it - It's hard to stay on in power, but even more dangerous to themselves to ever release it. Meanwhile China prefers a passive neighbor, dependent on it, to a vibrant and free economic power like South Korea. As a result it will continue to support Kim until the costs and risks to them become too great, or Kim's rule in North Korea starts to unravel.
It appears Trump's strategy is directed at both elements of the problem. The direct talks with North Korea are only a small part of a larger strategy.