monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

However, none of Obama's were involved with hush money to try and cover up something.

Trump is a still a crooked lying cheat

I said any party that is in that government is complicit and therefore IMO Nazis. Pay attention to what is said.

Violent crime, terror attacks, and epidemic levels of sexual assault in Europe are “not linked” to mass migration, Emmanuel Macron has said, blaming “discrimination” and inequality for the phenomena.

neo-Nazis

neo-Nazis= Islamics, and the governments that enable them. Germany is one of them.

Parties that, by reason of their aims or the behaviour of their adherents, seek to undermine or abolish the free democratic basic order or to endanger the existence of the Federal Republic of Germany shall be unconstitutional.

BREAKING: In a statement Friday, Rudolph Giuliani said the October 2016 settlement was made to protect President Trump’s family and “would have been done in any event, whether he was a candidate or not.”

Giuliani’s latest comments came after he mused Thursday what would have happened if Stormy Daniels’s allegation of a decade-old affair had surfaced right before the election – remarks that legal experts said gave investigators new fodder.

On Friday, Giuliani also stressed his description of the timing of events was based on his understanding, not information he received from the president.

Actually, neo-Nazi parties have been outlawed here through the Federal Constitutional Court

They say you can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep. The presidency is no different: when it comes to a commander-in-chief, you can tell a lot from the aides they keep close.

Barack Obama’s closest staffers were often intensely competitive, earnest, studious types who struggled to understand why the world didn’t admire their idealism and talent as much as they did. George W Bush, at least in his first term, surrounded himself with trigger-happy street fighters who confused patriotism with their own paranoia and prejudice.

In the case of Donald Trump, the company he keeps is surprisingly consistent: a singular type with a shared set of character traits. They are, to a man, cocky, unqualified and kooky. You might call this the CUK theory of the Trump presidency, in honor of one of their archetypes: Steve Bannon.

All the president’s men – at least, the CUKs – are a constant presence, in spite of the huge turnover among them. There was Bannon, now there’s Bolton. There was Scaramucci, now there’s Giuliani. It matters not. Trump cycles through his CUKs happily and frequently because he needs to keep one or more close through all his volatility.
... ... ...

Let me know when they outlaw Islam, it is Nazi like in many ways. Why the exception?

If there would be a "Nazi-like" political "Islam"

That would be any Muslim candidate.

As far as I know, none of any political party asks about religious affiliation - that would be unconstitutional.

CNN Writer Says Pro-Trump Kanye West Should Be Denied Right To Express Opinions

And a very stupid mistake when it comes to Islam. They are prepared to use every law you have against you. A smart man would have figured that out a while ago.

You can call it stupid,

WOW! Federal Judge reprimands Mueller’s team for wanting to OUST Trump!

“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud,” Ellis said to prosecutor Michael Dreeben, at times losing his temper. Ellis said prosecutors were interested in Manafort because of his potential to provide material that would lead to Trump’s “prosecution or impeachment,” Ellis said.

When Dreeben answered Ellis’ question about how the investigation and its charges date back to before the Trump campaign formed, the judge shot back, “None of that information has to do with information related to Russian government coordination and the campaign of Donald Trump.”

‘Stop listening to all the babbling’: Levin says Mueller cannot indict Trump — ‘period’

“This is not me speaking; this is the Department of Justice speaking, and the position of the Justice Department has not been repealed and has not been amended” since October 16, 2000, Levin said. “Grand juries and prosecutors cannot supplant Congress.”

because you say

40 Questions Special Counsel Robert Mueller Needs to Answer Now

23.) Are you responsible for the FBI's misusing the Patriot Act, NSLs and other methods to obtain information on American citizens without probable cause?

24.) Other than the attorney general, did anyone lose his or her job as a result of the widespread abuse of NSLs and the Patriot Act?

25.) When you said at the time that you were accountable for that massive assault on the constitutional rights of American citizens, how exactly were you held accountable? Did you write or find some way to apologize to or compensate the thousands of Americans whose records were improperly seized?

Mueller's Witch Hunt Against Sen. Ted Stevens
Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) was falsely charged and prosecuted in 2008 just 100 days before his re-election bid for what the FBI alleged was not paying full price for improvements to a cabin he owned in Alaska. In the midst of the prosecution, Stevens lost his re-election bid and, two years later, lost his life.

Large-scale misconduct was revealed through a whistleblower in an audit of the case, in which FBI agents and prosecutors, among many other things, withheld exculpatory evidence.

26.) Were you aware of any exculpatory evidence, or attempts to conceal evidence, that would have exonerated Stevens?

27.) Did you take any actions of any kind to prevent FBI agent Mary Beth Kepner from being fired? Did you take any actions to pursue disciplinary procedures against her for the wrongdoing in the Stevens case?

28.) Why was the whistleblower, FBI agent Chad Joy, permanently restricted from participating in any more criminal cases? Whose decision was that? Did you approve of it? Is it true that whistleblowers against the FBI while you were FBI director were routinely disciplined or dismissed, despite any wrongdoing they unearthed or caused to be corrected?

29.) Why was a critical witness in the case with exculpatory evidence sent back to Alaska by FBI agents before the information could be shared with Stevens' defense attorneys? Did you ever consider advocating to have the case against Stevens dropped when you learned of all the improprieties, instead of waiting for a new attorney general to take over and drop the charges the following year?