@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:Maybe because it removed a strongman who after Reagan almost blew his ass off was content with oppressing just his people.
Except he wasn't. He massacred a bunch of American college students in the Pan Am 103 Lockerbie bombing.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:Now we have another failed state where terrorists can thrive.
Not ideal, but still a sizable improvement over the previous situation.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:I hardly mourn Moammar (although no one should die as he did),
I think his death was appropriate for his crimes. If anything I'd like for him to have died an even more horrible death.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:but since Obama and Clinton weren't prepared to replace him with a democratic reformer, the intervention was all for show and led to the terrible tragedy of Benghazi.
We should have had better security for the ambassador and his staff. But that's not a reason to deny justice to the victims of Pan Am 103.