@blatham,
blatham wrote:
I've never claimed that one can't find analogous elements between Dem history and GOP history. But to presume, as your equivalence framing would have it, that A always equals B is, again (sorry) just lazy.
......
Parties don't stay the same and cultures don't stay the same. Bad stuff can (and will) turn up; eg McCarthy, Nixon, Cheney, Facebook. The equivalence formulation avoids almost everything of importance through refusal to make discernments.
That equivalence nonsense is a rather worn out and deceptive rhetorical device. I did not in any way suggest that Democrat & Republican platforms, organizations the or the views of folks variously described ( with changing meanings over time) were "equivalent", though you have deceptively attempted to attach that label to my words.
The lie here is your implication that, if there is
any discernible difference between them, then my assertion that both political groups have leaders, organizations, wealthy donors and private organization that support them must necessarily be wrong.
That is certainly false. The laziness here is all on your part. as you, once again, use this sophistry to evade any engagement on rather obvious facts, and hide behind devices like this equivalence crap to sustain your conspiratorial theories about the supposed unique evils attached to ideas with which you don't agree and the people and groups which advance them.
The undeniable fact is that both Democrats and Republicans, including all the self styled Progressives, Liberals and Conservatives who constitute these groups, do indeed have and cultivate donors, support groups, and private organizations with interests like their own to advance their favored policies. That folks, who hold political views different from your own, plan, organize and coordinate their activities to advance these interests is no more evidence of a dark conspiracy than are the completely analogous activities of their political opponents whom you applaud and whose writings you post with such frequency here.
Such sophistry is worse than lazy: it is obviously wrong, stupid and deceptive.