192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
revelette1
 
  1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 08:34 am
Quote:
He hasn’t taken office yet, but Donald Trump is lost, wandering in a labyrinth of lies and trying to drag the country in with him.

Witness his reaction to being called out on Sunday by Meryl Streep. Speaking at the Golden Globes, she said she had been stunned and heartbroken to see him mock a reporter with a physical disability.

It happened at a speech in 2015 in South Carolina. Mr. Trump’s target was Serge Kovaleski, of The Times, who has arthrogryposis, a condition that leaves his right arm and hand bent and rigid. “You ought to see this guy,” Mr. Trump told his audience, flailing his own right arm and hand in the air, making spastic movements, disgracing himself. The act was contemptible, and in a way unbelievable: a future president showing the maturity and schoolyard viciousness of an 8-year-old.

“I still can’t get it out of my head,” Ms. Streep said, “because it wasn’t in a movie. It was real life. And this instinct to humiliate, when it’s modeled by someone in the public platform, by someone powerful, it filters down into everybody’s life, because it kinda gives permission for other people to do the same thing. Disrespect invites disrespect, violence incites violence. And when the powerful use their position to bully others, we all lose.”

Quote:

Mr. Trump’s mouthpiece, Kellyanne Conway, went on TV on Monday to defend her boss. “He has debunked this so many times,” she said, casually contorting the meaning of “debunked.” (She meant “pathetically denied.”)

“Why is everything taken at face value?” she said. “You can’t give him the benefit of the doubt on this and he’s telling you what was in his heart? You always want to go by what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart.”

This is where things got really weird. Ms. Conway’s quote is a glimpse into the heart of darkness that a Trump presidency portends. She wants us to swallow Mr. Trump’s reality without question. To accept only what he says now — not what he said then — over the evidence seen and heard by our own eyes and ears. She wants us overcome the dissonance by looking for the “truth” in his heart.

The truth is getting harder to see in the flickering gaslight of Mr. Trump’s America, but it’s there. Not “in his heart,” or out of his mouth, no matter how much this man and his minions say otherwise.


source

I think the excerpts says everything and most know the truth. Some decent people must have really really not wanted Hillary in office to let this guy in, it didn't take much, but apparently enough.
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 08:44 am
Because government's job is to intrude into citizens' personal lives and their most personal decisions
Quote:
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said Monday he’ll use rarely invoked congressional authority to block a new law passed by the D.C. Council to allow doctors to help end the lives of terminally ill patients in the city.
LINK
McGentrix
 
  1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 08:51 am
@blatham,
That's a pretty stupid move. Chaffetz should probably sit down and shut up on that one.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 08:51 am
Meryl Streep was right.
McGentrix
 
  0  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 08:52 am
@MontereyJack,
But who cares?
Debra Law
 
  1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 08:59 am
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

Quote:
He hasn’t taken office yet, but Donald Trump is lost, wandering in a labyrinth of lies and trying to drag the country in with him.

Witness his reaction to being called out on Sunday by Meryl Streep. Speaking at the Golden Globes, she said she had been stunned and heartbroken to see him mock a reporter with a physical disability.

It happened at a speech in 2015 in South Carolina. Mr. Trump’s target was Serge Kovaleski, of The Times, who has arthrogryposis, a condition that leaves his right arm and hand bent and rigid. “You ought to see this guy,” Mr. Trump told his audience, flailing his own right arm and hand in the air, making spastic movements, disgracing himself. The act was contemptible, and in a way unbelievable: a future president showing the maturity and schoolyard viciousness of an 8-year-old.

“I still can’t get it out of my head,” Ms. Streep said, “because it wasn’t in a movie. It was real life. And this instinct to humiliate, when it’s modeled by someone in the public platform, by someone powerful, it filters down into everybody’s life, because it kinda gives permission for other people to do the same thing. Disrespect invites disrespect, violence incites violence. And when the powerful use their position to bully others, we all lose.”

Quote:

Mr. Trump’s mouthpiece, Kellyanne Conway, went on TV on Monday to defend her boss. “He has debunked this so many times,” she said, casually contorting the meaning of “debunked.” (She meant “pathetically denied.”)

“Why is everything taken at face value?” she said. “You can’t give him the benefit of the doubt on this and he’s telling you what was in his heart? You always want to go by what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart.”

This is where things got really weird. Ms. Conway’s quote is a glimpse into the heart of darkness that a Trump presidency portends. She wants us to swallow Mr. Trump’s reality without question. To accept only what he says now — not what he said then — over the evidence seen and heard by our own eyes and ears. She wants us overcome the dissonance by looking for the “truth” in his heart.

The truth is getting harder to see in the flickering gaslight of Mr. Trump’s America, but it’s there. Not “in his heart,” or out of his mouth, no matter how much this man and his minions say otherwise.


source

I think the excerpts says everything and most know the truth. Some decent people must have really really not wanted Hillary in office to let this guy in, it didn't take much, but apparently enough.


The emperor wears no clothes. But we're commanded that we can't judge Trump by any outward appearance. We're commanded to disregard his words and his conduct or the many inconsistencies between the two. Instead, we're supposed to judge his heart?

But how do we know if someone has a heart worthy of being judged as good? Well, we examine his words and his conduct. All of which point to a person who is unfit in ways too numerous to count.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:01 am
@McGentrix,
But who cares [that Streep was right]?

Trump, clearly.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:05 am
@blatham,
And the clear majority of voters who rejected Trump and everything whe stands for.
Frugal1
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:08 am
@blatham,


She only helps Trump.

Once again, Hollywood illustrates why people ignored its collective demand to vote against Donald Trump.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  0  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:08 am
@MontereyJack,
I have a new avatar for you MJ.

http://onetrick.biz/images/logoEMB.png
Frugal1
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:09 am
@MontereyJack,
That's a liberal lie.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:18 am
This guy is a piece of work:

Quote:
A Republican senator said flat-out on Monday that Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees should be subject to less exacting vetting standards than those of previous administrations.

Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) was asked by the Huffington Post if Trump’s Cabinet picks should be asked to disclose income from foreign sources, as he and 25 other senators asked of President Barack Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense, Chuck Hagel, back in 2013.

Infohe said no.

“So it’s different now because it’s Trump?” HuffPost asked.

“That’s just right,” the Oklahoma senator replied.

“That’s right?” HuffPost pressed.

“Yeah,” he said.

In 2013, Inhofe signed onto a letter Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) wrote to Hagel asking for “full and complete answers” on whether he had “received compensation, directly or indirectly from foreign sources.” The letter said the Senate and American people deserved to know this information before determining whether Hagel could be confirmed to lead the State Department.

The same standard has not been upheld for Trump’s nominees, some of whom have yet to properly disclose their financial holdings or complete their agreements with the Office of Government Ethics.
LINK

But at least give him marks for explicitly and honestly stating what GOP political leaders actually think along with pretty much all GOP political figures lower down the chain.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:23 am
@MontereyJack,
Oh yes. Many will attend to what Streep said. That's why this current campaign to derogate her and actors/Hollywood. Well, that and Trump's pathological tendencies towards tyranny when faced with opposition, criticism or satire.
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:30 am
Quote:
Trump can't even tell the truth about dress sales

Clothing sales in the nation's capital aren't generally the basis for national news coverage, but a president-elect who just can't stop telling self-aggrandizing falsehoods is worthy of some attention.

Early yesterday, Donald Trump talked to the New York Times about Meryl Streep's criticism, which led him to make a curious boast.
Quote:
Mr. Trump said that, Ms. Streep and her allies aside, he was confident that celebrities and others would turn out in strong numbers for his inauguration.

"We are going to have an unbelievable, perhaps record-setting turnout for the inauguration, and there will be plenty of movie and entertainment stars," Mr. Trump said. "All the dress shops are sold out in Washington. It's hard to find a great dress for this inauguration."

Obviously, the point of a boast like this is Trump's way of trying to hype himself and his inauguration. DC dress shops no longer have an inventory, the president-elect believes, because so many women are so excited about his inauguration that they've flocked to Washington, buying up formal attire and cleaning dress shops out.

Except, that's not all true. The Washington Post checked with stores in the area and found plenty of dresses on racks. The general manager of a Neiman Marcus store literally laughed when told about Trump's claim...
LINK
0 Replies
 
Frugal1
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:33 am

This is great news!

U.S. Small-Business Optimism Index Surges by Most Since 1980
Frugal1
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:39 am
And enemy desiring to subvert and destroy our country could not possibly find a more effective tool then political correctness.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  0  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 09:54 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Oh yes. Many will attend to what Streep said. That's why this current campaign to derogate her and actors/Hollywood. Well, that and Trump's pathological tendencies towards tyranny when faced with opposition, criticism or satire.


What "tyranny" has Trump done?
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 10:13 am
Quote:
The Republican plan to repeal Obamacare and delay the implementation of the repeal — with a promise to come up with a terrific replacement later — is probably the party’s best way to destroy Obamacare. Unfortunately for Republicans, it’s also the best way to destroy the Republican majority in Congress.

Something big is happening in the Senate right now: The Republican plan, affirmed again today by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, is facing dire peril from Republican defections. Republicans need a House majority, 50 Senate votes, and soon-to-be President Trump to pass repeal and delay.

If Republicans lose three Senate votes, that drops them to 49, and repeal and delay cannot pass. At least three Republican senators (in addition to all the Democrats) now oppose repeal and delay...
LINK

Not a surprise. About 6 or 8 months ago, when asked what he'd do regarding the ACA, Trump said it wasn't a problem, just get rid of it "and replace it with something terrific". But the GOP never came up with a real-world replacement plan because their real goal was simply to gain power through demonizing the ACA. Now they have this problem of millions of Americans being better off through the program and if they destroy it, their electoral chances up the road look grim. Again, because what they care about is power and because their own rhetoric about the program's evil commie nature, this is a problem.
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 10:18 am
@georgeob1,
Quote:
What "tyranny" has Trump done?


Go read some definitions of "tyrant" and "tyranny" and you'll have your answer from not-a-leftie.
McGentrix
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2017 10:24 am
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

What "tyranny" has Trump done?


Obviously, in his beat down of that poor, desperate woman opponent, Trump exhibited cruel and oppressive methods to keep her from becoming the next President.

THEN, He had the gall to nominate people for his cabinet positions that didn't fit the preconceived Canadian notions of good, liberal people. Trump exhibits further cruel and oppressive rule by making mean twitter posts.

Just imagine what could possibly happen once he starts his job! The horror!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 03:11:49