192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 02:28 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
We'll see what happens with Pruitt though I'd be surprised if he gets the boot simply because he is exactly the man that the powerful Koch crowd want there. He didn't land in the post because Trump wanted that to happen as Trump really doesn't know his ass from a hole in ground on such matters. If he does go, expect someone as bad to replace him.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 02:31 pm
For fun, just tally up the poundage of horseshit in this:
Quote:
Special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed “far too soon” to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, Sen. Ron Johnson said Sunday.

Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said in an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he is concerned a special counsel had hindered investigations by Intelligence panels in both the House and Senate.

"What I've always said about it was — the special counsel was named far too soon. I would've much rather had the Senate and House Intelligence Committees complete their report.”

"There, there are completely different goals of a special counsel versus congressional oversight. I think, in this case, the most important thing is public disclosure," Johnson said. "And that is harmed when you start having special counsels, and all the information is, is gathered and is held close and sometimes never disclosed."
Politico

blatham
 
  4  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 02:35 pm
I expect most of us recall the tan suit scandal
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZsjQ-4V4AESoV7.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZsjSVrVoAAhOfM.jpg

Quote:
Ed Krassenstein 💎
‏@EdKrassen
Happy Easter
Below you will find a photo of President Obama, attending Church on Easter Sunday before being mocked by Republicans for wearing a tan suit

On the right you will see a photo of Trump playing golf, & Republicans are perfectly fine w/ him being at Mar-a-Lago on Easter

coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 02:36 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
For fun, just tally up the poundage of horseshit in this:

How many pounds do your almost 32,000 posts weigh?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 04:20 pm
@georgeob1,
naah, the original mine cleanups are legend. Remember, more gold is produced in S Carolina than in Calif and the cleanups were well done.

U mine tailings were always joint superfund with main responsibilities from the DOE. (since they had an army as big as our navy)

Coal mines, iron mines (DMIR) hve been doing Suprfund studies since EPA was established BY THE GOP.

Much of th dleanups were done by the mining companies themselves ith the expensing options (which actually allowed greater returns on stuff like taconite, chrome, titanium (copperas cleanups), and RRE's. (not to mention coal and oil) .
Insurance coverage became an issue and several states redefined the requirements that only the first insurer was responsible (Many mining companies would "Shop" insurance with the idea that coverage ws transferrable , then later it was cancelled out, to their dismay).




blatham
 
  1  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 05:02 pm
@farmerman,
I can't weigh in on the data you guys are speaking of but it did occur to me that the bestest business plan for large-scale polluters would be to decriminalize pollution so much as possible and then to set up, invest in or gain control of secondary industries which would make big bucks in pollution remediation.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  0  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 05:03 pm
@farmerman,
The DOE Ur mine cleanup program (UMTRA) closed eight years ago. EPA fairly recently settled the TRONOX claim for former Kerr McGee Ur mines, and is organizing their efforts now (though I suspect it will degenerate to yet another a bureaucratic perpetual deal).

I'm not as well versed in the original mine cleanup programs as are you, but do know that a very large number of other abandoned mines dominates the current list of candidate new Superfund Projects, and EPA is doing preliminary studies on them now. Most had prior but incomplete work done on them. I suspect EPA is a latecomer to the process but is moving forward with unaccustomed speed now.
blatham
 
  2  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 05:13 pm
Colorful, let's say.
Quote:
On Nov. 21, 1922, the first female senator was sworn into office. Her tenure lasted for one day, at the age of 87. Her name was Rebecca Latimer Felton, and she is best remembered as a pioneering Georgia suffragette, writer and conservative advocate.

History has spent less time remembering Felton as a white supremacist and a slave owner.

In what was arguably her most famous speech in 1897, Felton advocated for the lynching of black men. “If it needs lynching to protect women’s dearest possession from the ravening human beasts — then I say lynch, a thousand a week, if necessary,” she said.
Go here to find out more about a woman's dearest possession and the ravening human beasts who might violate it

Also wondering if the relevant theological literature makes surmises as to the size of Satan's pecker.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 05:19 pm
This is really quite funny.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_480x320/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2018/04/01/Interactivity/Images/krvr_bluetooth_pet_rock_preview-hp.jpg?t=20170517a
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 05:19 pm
@blatham,
Obama dapper, Trumpy dumpy.
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 05:22 pm
@MontereyJack,
No question he is a handsome fellow. I'm also a pretty serious fan of the Mrs. But it is really their personalities that charm me all to heck.
farmerman
 
  2  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 05:37 pm
@georgeob1,
had the rules about expensing and coverage triggers not been screwed with, many of the mines that are still producing or are part of the list of sites owned by existing companies, would actually do cleanups on their own.
The early regs were great, they became royally screwed with between GHWB , Clinton, and GWB
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 07:38 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
But it is really their personalities that charm me all to heck.


You mean multiple personalities.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Sun 1 Apr, 2018 08:41 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Easter opinion in the NYT: Most white evangelicals would vote against Jesus Christ himself if he ran as anything but a Republican.
Democrats Are Christians, Too


This is why there is the old saying that opinions are like arseholes...

This one is particularly ridiculous, but it's her opinion

It's an opinion that is also highly insulting to "most white evangelicals" (whoever they are), but what else is new when it comes to Op-Ed pieces in the New York Times?

I suppose Ms. Sullivan feels she is fighting fire with fire by questioning the faith of self-identified Christians who support Trump or even vote Republican. I don't have any skin in the game from the standpoint of religious affiliation, but I find it problematic when anyone's faith is questioned because of politics. I certainly get the feeling Ms. Sullivan agrees with me on this and yet she apparently decided to jump into the mud puddle with both feet. How Christian of her.

I don't know if Obama is a Christian or not. I suspect he is not, but I cared about the question just a little bit less than I cared about whether or not he was born in America. However, because a skilled and eloquent orator "...spoke about the nature of his faith in some of the most explicitly Christian terms publicly used by any president." is proof of exactly nothing about the sincerity and depth of his faith.

I don't know or even suggest that it is the case with Obama, but it is more than possible for a man who says all the right words and, by all indications, has been a faithful husband, to not actually believe the fundamental tenets of a religion he has adopted in public for political reasons. At the same time, it is also more than possible for another man to not even know the right words to say; to be a habitual adulterer, and to sincerely believe there is a God, that his son died on a cross to save his soul, and to recognize his philandering as sin requiring repenting. As I understand the religion, the Christian god will forgive all sins of a repentant believer, but you're pretty much ****-out-of-luck if you don't believe there is a god whose forgiveness you need to ask.

This is not to argue that Obama is not a true Christian and Trump is or even that being one is indicative of higher moral character. No one can see into the minds of anyone, let alone Presidents Trump or Obama, so while we can have opinions about their faith based on the signs in which we choose to place importance, using those opinions as political weapons is, in my opinion, baseless.




hightor
 
  3  
Mon 2 Apr, 2018 02:54 am
Russian bots are rallying behind embattled Fox News host Laura Ingraham as advertisers dump her show
Quote:
As companies yank their ads from Fox News commentator Laura Ingraham's show in droves, she continues to draw support from one key Twitter demographic: Russian bots.

The advertiser exodus comes after Ingraham insulted Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg's grades on Twitter. The Fox News host announced Saturday that she would be taking a "pre-planned vacation" amid the controversy.

On Saturday evening, #istandwithlaura was the top trending hashtag among Twitter accounts linked to Russian influence operations, according to Hamilton 68, a website launched last year that tracks Russian propaganda campaigns in near-real time.

Per the site's data, the frequency with which the accounts tweeted the hashtag jumped by 2800% on Friday and Saturday.

Business Insider
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 2 Apr, 2018 04:17 am
Quote:
China has imposed tariffs of up to 25% on 128 US imports, including pork and wine, after US President Donald Trump raised duties on foreign steel and aluminium imports in March.

The tariffs affecting some $3bn (£2.1bn) of imports kick in on Monday.

Beijing said the move was to "safeguard China's interests and balance" losses caused by new US tariffs.

China had previously said it did not want a trade war but would not sit by if its economy was hurt.

Mr Trump, however, has insisted that "trade wars are good", and that it should be "easy" for the US to win one.

The American authorities have already announced plans for further targeted tariffs for tens of billions of dollars of Chinese imports, the BBC's Chris Buckler reports from Washington.

They say that is in response to unfair trading practices in China that affect US companies but it raises the possibility of yet more action being taken in what has become a tit-for-tat trade battle, our correspondent adds.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-43614400
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 2 Apr, 2018 05:49 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
ya know how it goes,"If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, and hangs around with ducks..."
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  5  
Mon 2 Apr, 2018 06:37 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
This response captures several things I find disappointing in modern Christianity.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

I don't know if Obama is a Christian or not. I suspect he is not...

Since when do we question a strangers professed faith? None of us personally know the former President, we just know him through his words and acts and nothing he has ever done or said is in any way out of sync with his professed faith. You might disagree with a fellow Christian's opinions or policies, that will likely happen on any given Sunday in any church around the country, but denying someone's faith, bringing false witness against them, for political reasons is about as un-Christian as you can get. I can't recall another politician subjected to this by mainline evangelical leaders.

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
At the same time, it is also more than possible for another man to not even know the right words to say; to be a habitual adulterer, and to sincerely believe there is a God, that his son died on a cross to save his soul, and to recognize his philandering as sin requiring repenting. As I understand the religion, the Christian god will forgive all sins of a repentant believer, but you're pretty much ****-out-of-luck if you don't believe there is a god whose forgiveness you need to ask.

And that last part is the key, isn't it? This is what really burned me about Roy Moore. Roy Moore was in no way repentant, did not seek forgiveness from his victims, did not renounce his sins. He thumped his Bible pretty hard, but both he and his followers never seemed to understand one of the most basic tenets of Christianity that forgiveness comes from repentance. If you are a Christian looking for good in Trump, it's hard when not only is there no repentance, but there are ongoing lies, doubling down on lies and denial.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

This is not to argue that Obama is not a true Christian and Trump is or even that being one is indicative of higher moral character.

Of course it was. You should be honest enough to admit that.
maporsche
 
  1  
Mon 2 Apr, 2018 07:44 am
@engineer,
I have a hard time understanding how anyone of sufficient intelligence, and who’s spent any amount of time self-examining their faith can reach a conclusion that all of the bible is true (regardless of the allegorical/literal sense). Being that the book claims to be the precise word of the only god and that the same god is infallible then logically I think most believers have more than a little doubt, and that many of them don’t even have as much faith or belief that their claimed god requires. Not to mention that their lives are often far from the ideals of their religion.
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 2 Apr, 2018 07:58 am
@maporsche,
I heard about how the Chinese have targeted a bunch of rural U products for reciprocal duty increases . Their theory was that these were strong Trumpies who will reap most of the negative benefits of a trade war
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.3 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 07:44:13