192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
glitterbag
 
  3  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 12:29 pm
@nononono,
Blah Blah Blah
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -3  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 12:29 pm
@nononono,
I have found that users posts to be of no use and have long ago placed them on ignore. You should do the same.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 12:29 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
I'll have to keep that in mind the next time you refer to me as "Finny"

He's burnt out.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 01:06 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Dreyfus was court-martialed. That's a different type of justice, generally more brutal, and in this particular case it was headed by old antisemite types who reached their verdict in secret.

Are you saying that Trump risks being court-martialed?

For the record, Dreyfus was officially exonerated by a military commission in 1906.

Readmitted into the army with a promotion, he was made Knight of the Legion of Honour, and subsequently assigned to command an artillery unit. He retired before the war, but enlisted in 1914 as a reservist, fought in Verdun among other positions, and retired for good in 1918 with the rank of Lieutenant-colonel and the title of Officer of the Légion d'Honneur.

Quote:
Dreyfus died in Paris aged 75, on 12 July 1935, exactly 29 years after his exoneration. Two days later, his funeral cortège passed the Place de la Concorde through the ranks of troops assembled for the Bastille Day national holiday (14 July 1935). He was interred in the Cimetière du Montparnasse, Paris. The inscription on his tombstone is in Hebrew and French. It reads (translated to English):

Here Lies
Lieutenant Colonel Alfred Dreyfus
Officer of the Legion of Honour
9 October 1859 – 12 July 1935
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 01:24 pm
@Olivier5,
Obviously, I don't need your little history lesson.

What I am saying should be quite clear to even you: Innocense is not a ward against unjust prosecution.
Olivier5
 
  4  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 02:15 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
That wasn't a good example. The legal protections afforded to the POTUS and his private legal team, can't be compared with the situation of a Jewish captain court-martialed in 19th century France.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -3  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 02:19 pm
@Olivier5,
It's a perfectly good example (particularly given your nationality).

You asserted that if Trump is innocent, he has nothing to fear from the current investigation and any following prosecution.

This has been proven to be false claim thousands of times in the past...and not just in France.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
 
  -4  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 02:27 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
John Bolton has spent his entire public life being an unbelievable slimeball.

Nonsense. He was instrumental in blocking the UN's horrible gun ban treaty:
http://web.archive.org/web/20081114083417/www.grip.org/bdg/g1894.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20051224131220/www.un.int/usa/01_104.htm

And he helped prevent Al Gore from cheating W out of the presidency:
http://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22I%27m+with+the+Bush+Cheney+team%2C+and+I%27m+here+to+stop+the+count.%22+!g
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette1
 
  3  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 02:53 pm
After earlier veto threat, Trump signs $1.3 trillion spending bill

Quote:
“While (Democrats) obstructed normal appropriations process, forcing an Omnibus, the benefits of Omnibus to national security, border security, opioid crisis, infrastructure, school safety and fixing gun background check system are important and will save lives. @realDonaldTrump,” Cornyn tweeted Friday.


0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 02:55 pm
Trump made it very clear the military is his main priority. That works for me.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 03:36 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Still, the guy is among the richest, he's got the best lawyers in town, and he is POTUS... He can't possibly be in a best legal position. You're pretending that he risks an unfair process by comparing him to Dreyfus is pretty absurd.
ehBeth
 
  4  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 04:05 pm
https://www.salon.com/2018/03/22/eric-holder-wins-lawsuit-against-scott-walker-judge-rules-wisconsin-must-hold-special-elections/

(Eric Holder on twitter: This wasn’t a battle between two people. This was a lawsuit brought on behalf of the people of Wisconsin against Scott Walker who disobeyed the law and denied representation to state citizens. Court said his politically motivated decision was just wrong )
or representative to the Assembly occurring before the 2nd Tuesday in May in the year in which a regular election is held to fill that seat shall be filled as promptly as possible by special election.”



Quote:
Wisconsin’s Republican Governor Scott Walker just got a judicial smackdown courtesy of former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

A Dane County Judge issued a writ on Thursday compelling the Wisconsin governor and failed presidential candidate to hold special elections for two legislative seats that became vacant on December 29, when Walker appointed the two elected Republican officeholders to join his administration. According to state law, Walker should have called for a special election to fill “any vacancy in the office of state senator or representative to the Assembly occurring before the 2nd Tuesday in May in the year in which a regular election is held to fill that seat shall be filled as promptly as possible by special election.”

But Walker had rejected calls to hold elections before this year's midterms, after Democrat Patty Schachtner won a January special election upset for a state Senate seat held by Republicans since 2000, in a district that was carried by Trump by 17 points in 2016. A Democrat also won 43 percent of the vote in an overwhelmingly Republican state Assembly district during that same special election.



Quote:
Walker and state Attorney General Brad Schimel contended that because the vacancies occurred in 2017, albeit at the very tail-end, section 8.50 of Wisconsin's state statutes does not technically apply. Democrats note, however, that Walker was happy to call for a January special election in a reliably red district that was also vacated in late 2017. But when a Democrat went on to win the seat in a shocking upset, Walker suddenly changed his tune on special elections.


Quote:
Judge Josann Reynolds, who was appointed by Walker in 2014, ruled against Walker’s logically inconsistent defense and ordered the governor to schedule special elections within the next 11 weeks. An announcement of the exact date must be made no later than March 29, the judge ordered.

"To state the obvious, if the plaintiffs have a right to vote for their representatives, they must have an election to do so," Reynolds wrote, as reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. She said Walker’s interpretation of the law “flies in the face of reason,” ‘’violates basic rules of grammar” and would lead to an “absurd result.”
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 04:10 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Wisconsin’s Republican Governor Scott Walker


Why does Walker keep winning his elections? Holder is irrelevant.
Quote:
Wisconsin's 45th Governor on January 3, 2011.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 06:51 pm
One section of the new 2018 omnibus spending bill is an appropriation to build a new one room prison that will be engineered using everyone of the new prototypes of the Mexican border wall tRump reviewed on his trip to California recently. It is specifically designed to house a "hughly" high level "guest".

This construction is on a fast track to be ready for the 90% probably it will be needed to house tRump when convicted of his racketeering charges in the next year or so. It will also have a torture chamber for this special prisoner. Not to get information out of him; but, just for the heck of it, and to start a new reality show to pay for everything and the nations enteratainment.

A sure bet to get the emmy he has always claimed he deserves. Make America Great Again, lock him up!
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  4  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 06:59 pm
Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham Warn Trump Will Be Impeached
After Spending Bill Signing: ‘Congratulations, President Schumer!’


Quote:
President Donald Trump signed a $1.3 trillion spending bill at the White House on Friday, and members of the far-right of the president’s party are not happy.

The legislation avoids a government shutdown and keeps the government running until September, but deficit hawks attacked the president for signing one of the largest increases in federal spending in years. Conservatives also attacked the president for signing a bill that failed to fully fund a wall on the southern border.

Trump had tweeted earlier in the day that he was considering vetoing the bill over its lack of funding for the border wall, and its failure to offer a solution for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, also known as DACA. At the signing ceremony, Trump said he thought about vetoing the bill, but ultimately deemed the legislation necessary to create “by far the strongest military we’ve ever had.”

Many conservatives on Twitter said passage of the bill was a win for Democrats. Conservative provocateur Ann Coulter mocked the signings by tweeting "Congratulations, President Schumer," in reference to Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Fox News host and Trump supporter Laura Ingraham, meanwhile, claimed that by signing the bill, the president had furthered his chances of being impeached if Democrats win back control of the House in the 2018 midterms.

The final version of the 2,000-page bill wasn’t unveiled until Wednesday, giving Congress just a few hours to read the legislation before voting on it. The short time frame prompted Trump to declare that he would “never sign another bill like this again.”

“Nobody read it. It’s only hours old,” Trump said.

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-laura-ingraham-ann-coulter-impeached-859165
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 07:05 pm
@Real Music,
Quote:
Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham Warn Trump Will Be Impeached


Very different than your title suggests. All they said is, if he signs another bill like that he should be impeached. Try telling the truth and not taking things out of context.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 01:39:32