monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

@Sturgis,

McCabe was recommended for firing by the FBI and the IG. If Sessions told him it makes no difference. They all work for the government, or should I say the people?

Quote:

After an extensive and fair investigation and according to Department of Justice procedure, the Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) provided its report on allegations of misconduct by Andrew McCabe to the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR).

The FBI’s OPR then reviewed the report and underlying documents and issued a disciplinary proposal recommending the dismissal of Mr. McCabe. Both the OIG and FBI OPR reports concluded that Mr. McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor − including under oath − on multiple occasions.

http://therightscoop.com/the-five-reasons-that-prove-firing-andrew-mccabe-was-the-logical-reasonable-right-thing-to-do/

0 Replies

The tRump firing of McCabe is political sadism!

2 Replies

@BillW,

Quote:

The tRump firing of McCabe is political sadism!

You spreading lies is right up there too.

0 Replies

http://patriotretort.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/The-Opranos-01.jpg

http://patriotretort.com/vindictive-little-creeps-arent-they/

0 Replies

@BillW,

Quote:

The tRump firing of McCabe is political sadism!

Then you are claiming Trump has politicized the FBI? The FBI fired him(McCabe) for leaking information with what he says he did with Comey's approval. An approval Comey had denied before Congress.

You have to lie to cover up a lie. They are getting caught regularly.

Quote:

The battle isn’t over Trump, it’s over whether our normal democratic and constitutional politics which elected Trump will prevail over the deep state.

That is what is going on. If you choose to side with un-elected control freaks do not expect it to end well.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/03/who-elected-john-brennan/#sthash.zQSHMDaY.uxfs

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

We did not elect Trump. We rejected him and his agenda. Yhe anti-democractic Electoral College I'm;posed him on us.The country at large thinks he'a wrecking us.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

We did not elect Trump

Oh yes, we did. And we followed the rules. And the country at large is just fine with Trump. You people here have the problem. Laughing

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
He would need to be court marshaled by the same government who takes away McCabe's pension.

The military, not the government, court marshals soldiers. And McCabe was fired by the FBI, not the government.

Now how is this going to bite Trump in the ass?

Try again, He was fired by the Attny General Jeff Sessions.....Maybe you missed this in civics class tovarich but it's all part of the federal government.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
That's nearly a literal Goebbels quote.

It is also true. What you going to do Wally discount the truth? It really does not matter who tells it, it is still truth.

But it's not the freeping truth God dammit, it's deception, it's lying, it's a sin of omission. How can you not know that?? You do know that though, don't you? You are just a big bag of malignant deception trying to get over on others. What happened, was your mother mean, did your Dad think you were dim, boo frigging hoo, Get over it.

2 Replies

@glitterbag,

Quote:

trying to get over on others.

First, you apparently do not understand what I said, I am not trying to get over on anyone. And I have no interest in what you think, it is irrelevant. You got it bad.

Get over it.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Trump lost the election by nearly three million votes. We did not want him. The Electoral Cokllege, which was created to be anti-democratic and is, chose him, in defiance of the people's clearly expressed antipathy for him. The EC seems to exist solely to choose Republicans that lose the vote. And the country is not fine with him. The most unpopular president since the 19th century, the president that has NEVER come near approval by a majority of the citizens of this country. By all indications the GOP will be taking a bath come November and , the gods willing, and it looks like they will be, he will lose at least one house of congress and after that be unable to impose his detestable will on us.

2 Replies

@MontereyJack,

Killary had a 90% chance, do you really want to make predictions?

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

You poor soul, EVERYONE understands 'what you said', you are spouting propaganda and perhaps you even believe it yourself. Oh, and let me offer you a hearty and robust WHO CARES about your limited understanding of what either I or others write. It falls into the category of tough ti&&y, no one gives a crap.

3 Replies

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

The EC seems to exist solely to choose Republicans that lose the vote.

The EC serves a great purpose in preventing local issues from influencing national results. That may not have been the original reason for the EC. But it fulfills that purpose quite admirably anyway.

MontereyJack wrote:

the country is not fine with him.

There were people who didn't like Lincoln too. It didn't interfere with his success.

MontereyJack wrote:

he will lose at least one house of congress and after that be unable to impose his detestable will on us.

He is going to retain all of the powers of the presidency regardless of who controls Congress.

Also, the only way the Democrats are going to take the House is if they nominate people like me to run in close districts. And if you start getting people like me having a say in Democratic circles, that'll be the end of the lefts' quest to violate the Second Amendment.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

Ignore(poof!)

0 Replies

@oralloy,

The EC because it is heavily weighted in favor of the lower population states and gives them outsized importance in the voting, does NOT favor things in the national interest, but rather in local parochial interests. UYou're wrong there.
There are cleaqrly peoiole in favor and not in favor of everybody who has ever been in office. He does enjoy majorty disgust with him though.. But Trump has NEVER come close to having a majority of the populace supporting him or the things he's advocated. And that's not going tok change. He's losing most of the special elections, even the ones that should be a lock for the GOP. That doesn't bode well for November. And considering that the obdurate refusal of the GOP to deal with Obama, who did in fact have majority support of the country, and the difficulty he had getting the legislation the country needed through, is ap; pretty good indication that we can do the same with Trump, who does NOT enjoy anything like majorty support

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

How's he been doing in the special elections we've had the past year, bunky? R4emember how his rallies won him the races in Alabama and PA? Which were both in heavily Republicab strongholds. Doesn't look good for the con man..

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Remember those Democrats ran away from Pelosi and said they would work with Trump. I don't care how he gets it done.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

The EC because it is heavily weighted in favor of the lower population states and gives them outsized importance in the voting,

This weighting exists, but it is not very heavy at all.

And there is something to be said for giving low-population areas a small boost when competing against high-population areas. Think of it as electoral affirmative action.

MontereyJack wrote:

but rather in local parochial interests. UYou're wrong there.

Local issues can drive voters to the polls in very large numbers. When this happens in a city in a presidential election year, the voters in that city end up casting a lot of presidential ballots.

Without the electoral college, this flood of presidential ballots could easily swamp the will of voters in other parts of the country where a local issue did not drive voters to the polls.

With the electoral college, the flood of voters only influences the electors that are assigned to that state, and the voters in other states do not have their voices drowned out because of a flood of voters turning out for some local issue in a distant city.

MontereyJack wrote:

And considering that the obdurate refusal of the GOP to deal with Obama,

That's Democratic propaganda to excuse away Obama's failures as a president. The GOP tried to work with him.

MontereyJack wrote:

is ap; pretty good indication that we can do the same with Trump,

I think the Democrats already tried a government shutdown and it went badly for them.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

You must admit it's funny when he gets so angry. He does impotent rage quite a lot, must have had a lot of practice.

I bet the local kids play games seeing who can piss him off the most.

3 Replies

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know