192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 11 Mar, 2018 10:44 pm
The New Yorker has a really excellent piece of reporting up now on Steele and the dossier. It is by far the best information source I've bumped into. A must-read (it's longish but do not let that stop you) Read it here
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Sun 11 Mar, 2018 11:08 pm
@blatham,
please give us a synopsis. from what I've reqd, the dossier is pretty much spot on..Many people thought the prostitute bits didn't have a lot of evidence. Of course Stormy Daniels immediately u[pped the dossier's likely veracity there too. Does the NY come to that conclusion?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 02:10 am
Quote:
South Korea says it has not received a response from Pyongyang on a summit between North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and US President Donald Trump.

In a surprise development, Mr Trump on Friday accepted North Korea's invitation to direct talks.

South Korean officials said Mr Kim was prepared to give up his nuclear weapons.

Details on the planned talks remain vague, with no agreement yet on the location or agenda.

Analysts are sceptical about what can be achieved through talks given the complexity of the issues involved.

"We have not seen nor received an official response from the North Korean regime regarding the North Korea-US summit," a spokesman for the South Korean Ministry of Unification said on Monday.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-43368110
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 02:30 am
@MontereyJack,
I put that piece up a few days ago, as well (here) in response to a dismissive account of the reporting by Finn. Basically it states that Steele comes across as sincere and truly worried about the Russian ties to the Trump campaign. Contact after contact is detailed and a timeline is established. The history of the dossier is discussed, 'who knew what when', and how the findings were handled by the FBI. The salacious bits are neither proven nor unproven, as that is not the purpose of these sorts of intelligence compilations by private firms and subcontractors.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 04:23 am
@MontereyJack,
I see that hightor has done my work for me here. But in any case, the piece is definitely worth one's time.
@hightor
Sorry. Somehow missed your earlier reference to the piece.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 04:45 am
Quote:
Trump stumped alongside Saccone on Saturday, blasting “Lamb the sham” and pushing for support of Saccone because “the world is watching.” But he barely mentioned the candidate he was ostensibly there to back, instead spending most of his speech attacking his own possible 2020 opponents and the media...
TPM

"Lamb the sham". It takes a literary genius to come up with that phrasing. This guy could have written Lincoln's Cooper Union speech and done in half the time while watching Fox and eating a MacDonald's colonoscopy-prep-day cheeseburger.

As to making this event all about himself rather than the candidate being endorsed, that's such a surprise because Trump is normally concerned with others and nearly always eschews mention of or reference to himself. It's a matter of character.
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 05:59 am
This is the final graph of an op ed in the WP by two defense analysts:
Quote:
Russia is using Western democratic norms to divide Western countries. Boosting government transparency and ensuring stability in institutions also could be proactive policy steps, and this would mean fewer opportunities to divide populations on issues. Stable institutions and the population’s trust in its government can help thwart influence campaigns, and ultimately make Russian cyber and information operations inconsequential to Western political discourse.
WP

What struck me in reading this piece, particularly the quoted graph, is how Bannon's goals and strategies match Putin's.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 06:22 am
Quote:
President Donald Trump's campaign to discredit the news media has spread to officials at all levels of government, who are echoing his use of the term "fake news" as a weapon against unflattering stories.

It's become ubiquitous as a signal to a politician's supporters to ignore legitimate reporting and hard questions, as a smear of the beleaguered and dwindling local press corps, and as a way for conservatives to push back against what they call biased stories.
AP

It is not easy to imagine how the US is going to recover from this very purposeful attack on knowledge and reason.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  6  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 09:44 am
I knew in the end Trump would end up just endorsing gun control measures of which the NRA approves after all the big talk. Figures.

WH vows to arm teachers, backs off raising age
revelette1
 
  4  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 09:46 am
Quote:
(Bloomberg) -- Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice is said to be close to completion, but he may set it aside while he finishes other key parts of his probe, such as possible collusion and the hacking of Democrats, according to current and former U.S. officials.

That’s because Mueller may calculate that if he tries to bring charges in the obstruction case -- the part that may hit closest to Trump personally -- witnesses may become less cooperative in other parts of the probe, or the president may move to shut it down altogether.


source

0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  4  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 09:58 am
@blatham,
Because we need democrats to stop the tide of changes from republicans I hope Lamb wins; other than that, he seems too moderate for my taste; in specific on gun control. He supports no new legislation on gun control.

Is Conor Lamb the new model Democrat? Or will progressives come for him next?
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 10:07 am
@revelette1,
Bannon encouraging populists to embrace ‘racist’ label confirms belief about the worldview he brought to the White House
Quote:
[...]
The idea of taking pride in being called a racist is not something most people in the mainstream have embraced. There is a polling that suggests being a racist is still viewed poorly.

A recent poll suggests most Americans think Trump, who is experiencing low approval ratings, is a racist. Nearly six in 10 — 57 percent — of adults say America’s top politician is a racist, according to the poll.

While Trump has a four-decade history of actions and comments that many interpret as being discriminatory toward people of color, he has denied he is a racist on multiple occasions.

The fact that Trump rejects the label himself and goes as far as calling himself “the least racist person” suggests he and his U.S. followers who may share some of the politics of the French National Front may not be embracing the label anytime soon.

Whether populists in America, drawn to Trump’s policies on immigration, race and other issues related to diversity, officially embrace the “racist” label or not may be irrelevant. It appears a growing number of conservative Americans are embracing the worldview that Bannon — and even the president — perpetuate and defend.
... ... ...


And regarding Le Pen's new name for her party: critics questioned whether the FN leaders had suffered collective historical amnesia in choosing a name - Rassemblement National - that harks back to Nazi-supporting and extremest right organisations, or had picked it deliberately.
maporsche
 
  6  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 10:14 am
@revelette1,
I think many of us agree on that Rev.

The most important thing though is control of the legislative agenda. It’s better to have the majority even with 5-10 conservative Democrats than it is to be in the minority with 49 super-progressives.

If OurRevolution is half as smart as they think they are, they’ll support this guy on Election Day, even while pushing him to go further left all the other times.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 11:53 am
@Walter Hinteler,
and, to show the absolute hypocrisy of the RW (even showing up on these threads) - Bannon doesn't mean what is coming out of his mouth. Go figure! They are all racist, now we know it for sure, Bannon has made it truth!
Olivier5
 
  4  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 12:00 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
If Marine Le Pen is so desparate to take a certain distance from her racist father, why did she invite Bannon?

This party is a total mess since their loss in the last presidential election. They have lost any ideological coherence, now it's just a bunch of disheveled, confused fascists without a leader.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 12:03 pm
@BillW,
Quote:
They are all racist,


Can you stop saying they are all racist unless you can prove it. How are you going to do that? You sound like a spoiled child who can't get his way.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 12:05 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Marine Le Pen


LePen's daughter is very active and will carry on for her mother, and her immigration stance. They are hated because they speak the truth about Islam.
BillW
 
  3  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 12:07 pm
@Olivier5,
He has been shamed in America; but, right wingers will not disavow him. Therefore, they still own him and are fascist, racist like him. They try an invalid, hyprocritical declarative using tRumpian illogic that he doesn't mean what he is saying and thus, this is fake news. What bs! This, of course, it nativism at its ugliest.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 12:09 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
that harks back to Nazi-supporting and extremest right organisations, or had picked it deliberately.

Wally, can you think of any ideology similar to Nazism? I can, it is called Islam. Those are the new Nazis in Europe and I think it is a shame someone as intelligent as you cannot see that. And if you do see that, we will never know, you should be ashamed.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Mon 12 Mar, 2018 12:14 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
LePen's daughter is very active and will carry on for her mother, and her immigration stance. They are hated because they speak the truth about Islam.
Which one, Jehanne (19 years old) or Mathilde ((18 years old)? And where did you hear what of them? Besides that, how do you know they are attractive?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.55 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 04:47:59