@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:Perhaps in the past handguns were used by mass shooters more than assault types of weapons. However, in the past couple of shootings and the major one in Newtown, an assault type weapon was used. If the handgun is as capable as to shoot more than 10 rounds without pause or reloading then ban those too
A gun can fire as many shots without reloading as it has in the magazine. The features on the gun don't change anything. The number of rounds you have before reloading is always the number of rounds that you have in the magazine.
So a handgun with a ten round magazine has ten shots before reloading. A rifle with a ten round magazine has ten shots before reloading.
However, rifle wounds are vastly more devastating than handgun wounds. If I had a choice between defending myself with a rifle with a five round magazine and a handgun with a ten round magazine, I'd go with the rifle despite the smaller magazine.
revelette1 wrote:or just ban the magazines which turns ordinary weapons into assault military type weapons. Add to that ban any accessory or part which would do the same function in ordinary weapons.
The military assault terms are nonsense.
What matters is "rifle verses handgun" with regard to the power of each shot, and "magazine capacity" with regard to number of shots.