@Glennn,
Quote:What does that have to do with the fact that handguns are used way more often than rifles in mass shootings?
I'm guessing that the increased firepower of the AR15 and other similar assault-style weapons represents a perceived risk greater than that inherent in a pistol or revolver. To be certain we'd have to see more extensive statistics such as:
1) a list of every single "mass shooting" in the USA since say, August , 1966 (Texas Tower shooting)
2) a list of the weapon(s) and ammunition used and an estimate of how many rounds were fired and whether extra magazines were involved
3) number of dead and injured
Then we'd want to compare the type of weapons, how many pistols, revolvers, hunting rifles, shotguns, assault or military style weapons.
We'd want to pay attention to the injuries and see if we can establish any correlation between type of firearm, distance from shooter, severity of injury, etc.
Next would be to look to see if there were patterns developing, such as whether handguns are as popular today as they were over past decades and see if we can
establish any trends in firearm preference. Just saying that more handguns than rifles have been used historically doesn't tell us that much about the choices that are being made today.