@hightor,
hightor wrote:While I don't believe that effective home security is dependent on owning a firearm, at least Glennn is realistic enough to know that an assault-style weapon is unnecessary for this job (or any other application a civilian might choose to use a gun for.)
Any weapon is unnecessary if you consider that the same job could be done with a different gun.
Non-assault weapons are also unnecessary when you consider that the same job can be done with an assault weapon.
hightor wrote:The word "overkill" comes to mind.
Now you're just being silly. Having a pistol grip on a rifle does not make it more powerful.
hightor wrote:There are more than enough choices of non-militarized weaponry available for home defense, hunting, and having fun plinking in the local gravel pit.
Putting a pistol grip on a gun does not make it militarized.
And there are also more than enough choices of guns with a pistol grip on them too, so no need for anyone to
not use an assault weapon.
More to the point though. Whether people choose to use a gun with a pistol grip or without one, that is none of your business.
You don't get to choose for other people which guns they will use.