192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
old europe
 
  3  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 03:33 pm
@layman,
Quote:
It's sufficient as form of ID, sure. But it's not even required.


Can you point to the where the law says that, layman?
Steb
 
  -1  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 03:37 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Bingo! The false narrative and racist retort of the ineptly adept democrat strikes again. I didn't realize that all minorities were hapless until blatham pointed it out. (s).
0 Replies
 
Steb
 
  -1  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 03:41 pm
@blatham,
Off topic? Not really. You're not alone. All leftist's nublets are excruciatingly sore these days.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 03:50 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:

Quote:
It's sufficient as form of ID, sure. But it's not even required.


Can you point to the where the law says that, layman?


I already did, yesterday.

Stop asking questions, especially ones I have repeatedly answered, and answer one.

Answer the damn question, cheese-eater.
old europe
 
  3  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 04:20 pm
@layman,
No, you didn't.

You cited a source that says that a CA driver's license is acceptable ID in California.

Then you claimed that therefore AB-60s are an acceptable form of ID.

No evidence. Just conspiracy theories.
layman
 
  -1  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 04:21 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:

No, you didn't.

You cited a source that says that a CA driver's license is acceptable ID in California.

Then you claimed that therefore AB-60s are an acceptable form of ID.

No evidence. Just conspiracy theories.


Answer the damn question, cheese-eater.
old europe
 
  2  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 04:22 pm
@layman,
You're never going to back up your claim, are you?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  4  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 04:34 pm
layman wrote:
a chickenshit, candy-ass, cowardly, cheese-eater


I like it!

Throw out some conspiracy claims, post some unrelated links, never provide evidence for your claims, and when called on it come up with some mildly creative insults!

I also like the folksy style of actually writing out "sho nuff."

That's a great touch!
layman
 
  -3  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 04:37 pm
@old europe,
And thank you for the implicit admission that you are exactly what I said you are.
0 Replies
 
ossobucotemp
 
  0  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 04:47 pm
@old europe,
No, that isn't a great touch, as we get to see it over and over and over and over again.

I have no idea who this guy is, and I originally liked him.

I take cheese eater as those who have benefited from cheese distribution, like my ex's parents.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  0  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 05:22 pm
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:

Personally I would rather remain on the losing side than be anything like any of the above posters (excepting Roger and edgar of course) and Trump and his millionaire cabinet. All those anti establishment people are really going to be disillusioned when Trump and his cabinet only look out for the big corporations and billionaire class. All that talk of his campaign was nothing but a big con game.


No you woulnt... you're just parroting something you heard Jennifer Palmieri say in her argument with Kellyanne Conway. You liberals would have moved Heaven and Earth and made a deal with the Devil if you thought it would put Hillary in the Oval Office instead of trump so who's kidding who here.
Steb
 
  0  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 06:14 pm
@cicerone imposter,
With the Trump win, the stock market is now bullish! Smile
revelette2
 
  2  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 06:25 pm
@giujohn,
Shows what you know, I don't even know who Jennifer Palmieri is. I quit watching the news after the election so I have no idea what you are talking about and even care less.
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 06:25 pm
@Steb,
The stock market doesn't live on one increase or one decrease. It's the long-term trend ......and how our funds perform. The performance of our funds for the past 10 years have been relatively steady. Our beginning balance was $353k, withdrew $122k, and our ending balance is now $583k.

BTW, welcome to a2k.
wmwcjr
 
  4  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 06:53 pm
Nothing engenders hatred among people like politics.
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 07:16 pm
@wmwcjr,
And religion.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  1  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 07:26 pm
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:

Shows what you know, I don't even know who Jennifer Palmieri is. I quit watching the news after the election so I have no idea what you are talking about and even care less.


LOL...yes you do!
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  0  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 09:22 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
I do not accept your premise that Trump deliberately made statements that he knew at the time to be false more than Clinton did.

Your response comes as a complete surprise to me.

Personal references are not an argument.
0 Replies
 
Steb
 
  2  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 09:26 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Thanks, imposter. Glad to be here.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Fri 2 Dec, 2016 09:28 pm
@blatham,
Are you enjoying watching the blossoming bromance between georgeob and layman as much as I am. Sighhhhhhhh. To quote Judge Judy, there's a lid for every pot.💖
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 04:53:05