192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
maporsche
 
  4  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 02:32 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Setbacks among the majority Party in Congress in mid term elections are the norm, but I believe current indicators strongly suggest that Republicans will retain majorities in both Houses.


What specific indicators are those?
BillW
 
  3  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 03:20 pm
@maporsche,
crystal ball
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 03:24 pm
@layman,
Quote:
Them and their islamofascist terrorist homeys.


Who would be the terrorist homey's of Khamenei?
revelette1
 
  2  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 03:25 pm
@maporsche,
Specific and George don't compute. He seems to be better at airy pronouncements.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
layman
 
  -4  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 04:31 pm
Quote:
The report said the federal government pays its disclosed workforce $1 million per minute. The analysis is incomplete, however, as there are a number of federal employees who have not disclosed their salaries.

“We found small and large agencies across the federal government gaming the system for personal gain – and it’s expensive for the taxpayer,” OpenTheBooks.com CEO and founder Adam Andrzejewski said in a statement. “Congress should hold hearings to bring transparency to all the information we’re still missing, including performance bonuses and pension payouts. It’s time to squeeze out waste from compensation and stop abusive payroll practices.”


I recently read a story about some EPA guy who was making $200,000 per year for 8 years and never showed up for a single day of work, eh? The EPA is the worst. One study showed that they spent about 50% of their time watching porn and eating donuts at a meeting held for the purpose of scheduling their next meeting.

But, really, what's a million dollars a minute really add up to, eh? There's not THAT many minutes in a day, week, month, or year, is there?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 04:36 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

The reason I commented was because of course Trump tweeted and linked the lifting of sanctions and how all the money went to the leaders or some such thing.


America is mainly responsible for the delay in relaxing the sanctions, the only thing really being sold now is oil and that doesn't produce jobs. The powerful revolutionary guard are corrupt and have most to gain from the reformist president failing to improve the economy.
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 04:43 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
America is mainly responsible for the delay in relaxing the sanctions...


Quintessential cheese-eater reasoning there, eh? It's not the terror-funding, nuke developing, human rights-denying radical muslim clerics who are responsible for the sanctions and the current lack of funding--it's America's "delay" in "relaxing" sanctions that caused all these problems.

Obama gave them $100 BILLION and they blew it all on financing terrorism and lining their own pockets, but of course THAT can't be the reason why the people are starving, now, can it?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -4  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 05:06 pm
@layman,
Quote:
Iran’s Tasnim news agency quoted Mousa Ghazanfarabadi as saying: ‘Obviously one of their charges can be Moharebeh’ – waging war against God – an offence which carries the death penalty in Iran.


Well, yeah, that's an "obvious" charge, sho nuff, but I don't quite get it. I woulda thought that anybody who waged a war against GOD wouldn't be in the field too damn long, know what I'm sayin?

Turns out he needs some muslim with a rusty pocket knife to saw the heads off of the people who have been fighting him in the middle of a soccer stadium packed with islamofascists to eliminate their threat, eh?
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 05:38 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
. . . Honduras: the USA keeps silent as dozens Honduras protesters are killed in post-election violence.


Honduras and certain other countries have been to the U.S. what Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, et al., were to the former Soviet Union.
layman
 
  -4  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 05:44 pm
Why the outrage? If you want to attract young kids as viewers, you're gunna have to prove you're cool. Everybody knows that:

Quote:
Outrage grows over CNN's pot-infused New Year's segment

Outrage continues to mount two days after CNN put the “J” in journalism with a marijuana-themed New Year’s Eve.

During the liberal cable news network’s year-end broadcast from Times Square, reporter Randi Kaye did several, um, “hits” from Denver, where marijuana is legal. At various points, she held a joint, lit a bong, marveled over a special gas mask used by stoners and wondered where she was.

“This is for you, Andy!” Kaye said at one point, addressing CNN host Andy Cohen and holding a lit marijuana cigarette out to the camera.

Cohen enthusiastically praised Kaye’s report, while a smiling Cooper reminded viewers that Kaye’s high-jinx was all above board, even if a bit unseemly.

“I just want to point out that this is all legal in Colorado,” Cooper said, smiling.

Kaye, who sported dangling marijuana leaf earrings, said. “I’m trying to remember where we are. Where am I?”

“CNN is trying to trademark the debauchery as its brand for New Year's Eve coverage. I mean that quite seriously,” Media Research Center President Brent Bozell said on Tuesday, while explaining that the network no longer has comic Kathy Griffin using obscenities to attract viewers. This year they're doing pot and getting stoned,” Bozell said.

The story took another turn on Tuesday when WSB-TV reporter Tyisha Fernandes tweeted that 70 people were arrested when less than an ounce of marijuana was found at a house party. Since nobody claimed it, the police arrested everyone. Many people took to Twitter to point out what they described as hypocrisy between Fernandes’ report and what CNN had advocated on New Year’s Eve.


http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/01/02/outrage-grows-over-cnns-pot-infused-new-years-segment.html


Baldimo
 
  1  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 05:52 pm
@layman,
I'm in Denver and that's how I spent my night, along with some rum shots of course. All those shots of people getting drunk are ok though?
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 06:02 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

I'm in Denver and that's how I spent my night, along with some rum shots of course. All those shots of people getting drunk are ok though?


I thought the FCC rules were that you can never show anyone smoking a cigarette or taking a drink of booze on TV, not even in a commercial.
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 06:32 pm
Nice try, cheese-eaters:

Quote:
'CA Better Hold On Tight': ICE Dir Promises Doubling of Officers After 'Sanctuary' Law Signed

Acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Thomas Homan said California "better hold on tight" after its liberal Democratic governor allowed a sanctuary state law to take effect this week.

Neil Cavuto said that Gov. Jerry Brown claimed the law will protect illegal immigrants living quietly in the shadows of society from law enforcement intent on "yanking them out of there."

"There's no sanctuary from law enforcement," he said. "California better hold on tight - they're about to see a lot more deportation officers. If politicians don't protect their communities then ICE will.

Homan said that Brown and other sanctuary-jurisdiction leaders may have violated 8 U.S. Code § 1324 - relating to "harboring certain aliens."

He said he hopes the Justice Department will look into whether mayors or governors can be criminally charged under the statute.

According to text of the federal law cited by Homan, any person "knowing... the fact that an alien has come to... the United States in violation of the law, conceals, harbors or shields from detection... such [an] alien in any place" can face fines and/or up to several years in prison.


Best watch your ass, Moonbeam. Jeff is bearing down on you and all your cheese-eating homeys.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 06:35 pm
@layman,
I'm not sure about all the modern rules on TV to be honest, I know cable also has a different set of rules vs broadcast TV.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 06:51 pm
@layman,
Yeah, sho nuff. Says here:
Quote:
8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

Any person who encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324

That's just for mere encouragement or inducement, which Moonbeam and his homeys do every day.

There's also a provision, with the same punishment, for anyone who "conceals, harbors, or shields from detection an alien who has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law."

Your time aint long, Moonbeam.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Tue 2 Jan, 2018 07:13 pm
@wmwcjr,
Nonsense
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.46 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 07:35:13