192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 08:09 pm
@maporsche,
You can disagree all you want to, but the facts don't agree with the rhetoric. This is from the most recent data available from the IRS.
https://taxfoundation.org/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-2015-update/
Quote:
In 2013, the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers (those with AGIs below $36,841) earned 11.49 percent of total AGI. This group of taxpayers paid approximately $34 billion in taxes, or 2.78 percent of all income taxes in 2013. In contrast, the top 1 percent of all taxpayers (taxpayers with AGIs of $428,713 and above), earned 19.04 percent of all AGI in 2013, but paid 37.80 percent of all federal income taxes. In 2013, the top 1 percent of taxpayers accounted for more income taxes paid than the bottom 90 percent combined. The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid $465 billion, or 37.80 percent of all income taxes, while the bottom 90 percent paid $372 billion, or 30.20 percent of all income taxes.


maporsche
 
  2  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 08:29 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
That was well put.
maporsche
 
  4  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 08:38 pm
@Baldimo,
I'm not disagreeing with the facts (who could?), but your interpretation of what those facts say about our nation and the best policy to benefit its citizens.

For example, you say that fact that the top 1% pays 37% of all taxes means that they are overtaxed. I suppose you think that the top 1% should only pay 1% of the taxes (I'm guessing, you've never posted what a 'correct' number would be from what I recall).

Another fact is that the top 1% control 38% of the money in the nation (link below). They seem to only be paying taxes equal to the money that they control. I for one, think that they should be paying more taxes being that much of our government is designed to provide an ripe economic environment to further benefit everyone, but also the rich to a far greater degree as evidenced by the fact that the rich control a much greater share of the economy in 2017 then they did when I was born in 1979 (38% compared to 23%) while wages have remained stagnant for most of the 99%.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/27/the-top-1-percent-of-americans-now-control-38-percent-of-the-wealth.html
Builder
 
  -3  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 08:47 pm
@maporsche,
Interesting that when I asked you why you considered the tax bill to be atrocious, you had nowt to say.

The real issue now isn't the tax bill, BTW. It's the Executive Order.

Very likely put in place for quite specific targets, where literally billions of dollars will be reclaimed for the US people.

I'm not sure why your attention seems fixated on yesterday's news.
maporsche
 
  4  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 08:57 pm
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

Interesting that when I asked you why you considered the tax bill to be atrocious, you had nowt to say.


I actually had this to say, and I still stand by it.

IMO the tax bill:
1) wasn't needed
2) way to heavily favored the wealthy and the top 5%

Quote:
I'm not sure why your attention seems fixated on yesterday's news.


The executive order right now is just a piece of paper. Nothing has happened yet. Besides no republican should ever criticize anyone else for being fixated on yesterdays news.
layman
 
  -4  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 09:03 pm
Would you buy a new car from this lyin perv?:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTrhL5dnnUP8TuJAb6iMsE4PZ6mwZ0PPPYQyJRTJXHmPmqDPiIZ-g

Quote:
McCabe Refused to Answer Dossier Questions

According to leaks from FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s closed-door interview with the House Intelligence Committee, the embattled prosecutor has refused to answer any questions about the Christopher Steele dossier on President Donald Trump.

McCabe said he couldn’t recall how he learned about the manner in which the dossier was funded, and he refused to answer most other questions about the document.

Answers McCabe did give during his testimony, however, conflicted with those of several other key witnesses. The inconsistencies were so numerous that a new round of subpoenas is likely. Among those likely to be called include recently-demoted Justice Department official Bruce Ohr and FBI General Counsel James Baker.


https://www.trunews.com/article/mccabe-refused-to-answer-dossier-questions

0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 09:04 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:
Nothing has happened yet.


So, you're just waiting to see what the PTB do about it?

You're almost completely disconnected from the process, like a good little citizen, ain't you?

Quote:
Besides no republican should ever criticize anyone......


I generally vote Labor (your liberals) but thanks for stating that you think people shouldn't have an opinion.

maporsche
 
  4  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 09:11 pm
@Builder,
oh yaaaaaaaawn

My mistake for engaging with you. I'll fix that.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -4  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 09:23 pm
I pay zero income taxes and all I get is a 100% increase in the amount of cash the government pays me for each kid I claim (don't tell anybody, but its now at 49 and I keep increasing it each year).

THAT sunovabitch pays $100,000,000 in taxes and HE gets a TWO MILLION DOLLAR TAX CUT!!!!!

It just aint no kinda fair, I tellya!
Builder
 
  -4  
Thu 21 Dec, 2017 09:29 pm
@layman,
Dayum! I'm calling Time magazine.

They'd be interested in doing a story on your plight there, I'm sure.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Builder
 
  -2  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 02:25 am
@layman,
What's with all these CEO Resignations from Sept to Dec:??

Equifax CEO Richard Smith Sep. 26, 2017

Dentsply Sirona Inc CEO Jeffrey T. Slovin Oct. 2, 2017
Greater Naples CEO Paul Thein Oct. 4, 2017
Pepsico CEO D Shivakumar Oct. 9, 2017
Samsung CEO Kwon Oh-hyun Oct. 12, 2017
Oman Air CEO Paul Gregorowitsch Oct. 16, 2017
ASCENDAS Funds Management CEO Chia Nam Toon Oct. 20, 2017
Hudson's Bay CEO Gerald Storch Oct. 20, 2017
Red Cross Texas Gulf Coast Region CEO David Brady Oct. 28, 2017
BuildDirect CEO Jeff Booth Oct. 29, 2017
Podesta Group founder Tony Podesta Oct. 30, 2017
Menninger Clinic CEO Dr. C. Edward Coffey Oct. 31, 2017

Renaissance Technologies CEO Robert Mercer Nov. 2, 2017
Ardent Leisure CEO Simon Kelly Nov. 7, 2017
El Al CEO David Maimon Nov. 8, 2017
Altice CEO Michel Combes Nov. 9, 2017
Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane CEO Themba Dlamini Nov. 14, 2017
James Cancer Hospital CEO Michael Caligiuri Nov. 16, 2017
PR Electric Power Authority CEO Ricardo L. Ramos Nov. 17, 2017
Ellies CEO Wayne Samson Nov. 21, 2017
Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman Nov. 22, 2017
Oi SA CEO Marco Schroeder Nov. 24, 2017
Tumblr CEO David Karp Nov. 27, 2017
London Stock Exchange CEO Xavier Rolet Nov. 28, 2017
Bruce Telecom CEO Bart Cameron Nov. 29, 2017
TravelCenters of America LLC CEO Thomas O'Brien Nov. 30, 2017
Tricentennial Commission CEO Edward Benavides Nov. 30, 2017

City Light CEO Larry Weis Dec. 4, 2017
Steinhoff's R100bn CEO Markus Jooste Dec. 5, 2017
Uchumi Supermarkets CEO Julius Kipng'etich Dec. 6, 2017
Chicago Public Schools CEO Forrest Claypool Dec. 8, 2017
Deutsche Boerse CEO Carsten Kengeter Dec. 8, 2017
Nation Media Group CEO Joe Muganda Dec. 11, 2017
Cheil Worldwide CEO Daiki Lim Dec. 11, 2017
Fenway Health CEO Dr. Stephen L. Boswell Dec. 11, 2017
Diebold/Nixdorf CEO Andy Mattes Dec. 14, 2017
Diebold/Nixdorf CEO Andy Mattes Dec. 14, 2017
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson Dec. 15, 2017
Vast Resources CEO Roy Pitchford Dec. 18, 2017
Spackman Entertainment Group CEO Charles Spackman Dec. 18, 2017
ESPN President John Skipper Dec. 18, 2017
Innogy CEO Peter Terium Dec. 20, 2017
Papa John CEO John Schnatter Dec. 22, 2017
NYPD Police Chief Carlos Gomez retires Dec. 22, 2017
Alphabet Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt Dec. 22, 2017
Brand X
 
  1  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 04:51 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
I wasn't surprised at all, I watch CNBC every day. Business guests on their show have been talking about it all year, it was building into the stock market all year as well....that's why there was no bump in the DOW when it was finally passed.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  2  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 06:12 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

What's with all these CEO Resignations from Sept to Dec:??

If there are around 5000 major, world wide corporations you consider and a CEO lasts around five years, then you would expect around 250 resignations per quarter.
hightor
 
  3  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 06:22 am
Two stories about the late, lamented EPA:
Quote:
The Environmental Protection Agency will indefinitely postpone bans on certain uses of three toxic chemicals found in consumer products, according to an update of the Trump administration’s regulatory plans.

Critics said the reversal demonstrated the agency’s increasing reluctance to use enforcement powers granted to it last year by Congress under the Toxic Substances Control Act.

E.P.A. Administrator Scott Pruitt is “blatantly ignoring Congress’s clear directive to the agency to better protect the health and safety of millions of Americans by more effectively regulating some of the most dangerous chemicals known to man,” said Senator Tom Carper, Democrat of Delaware and the ranking minority member on the Senate Environment and Public Works committee.

NYT

and

Quote:
WASHINGTON — More than 700 people have left the Environmental Protection Agency since President Trump took office, a wave of departures that puts the administration nearly a quarter of the way toward its goal of shrinking the agency to levels last seen during the Reagan administration.

Of the employees who have quit, retired or taken a buyout package since the beginning of the year, more than 200 are scientists. An additional 96 are environmental protection specialists, a broad category that includes scientists as well as others experienced in investigating and analyzing pollution levels. Nine department directors have departed the agency as well as dozens of attorneys and program managers. Most of the employees who have left are not being replaced.

The departures reflect poor morale and a sense of grievance at the agency, which has been criticized by President Trump and top Republicans in Congress as bloated and guilty of regulatory overreach. That unease is likely to deepen following revelations that Republican campaign operatives were using the Freedom of Information Act to request copies of emails from E.P.A. officials suspected of opposing Mr. Trump and his agenda.

NYT





Setanta
 
  2  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 07:53 am
Ah, trickle-down . . . it was just a matter of time before someone trotted that old bullsh*t out. I worked in a homeless family shelter in the late 1980s--it was glaringly obvious then that that sh*t doesn't work and it will be again.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 08:41 am
@hightor,
Quote:
That unease is likely to deepen following revelations that Republican campaign operatives were using the Freedom of Information Act to request copies of emails from E.P.A. officials suspected of opposing Mr. Trump and his agenda.


I simply don't understand how in this country workers of federal agencies are not allowed to have opposing views of any current administration and express them to whomever or however they wish without fear of having their privacy violated for political purposes. Why are republican campaigns simply allowed to seek the EPA agents emails for political purposes? Talk about "rise of fascism."
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 08:52 am
Quote:
The Trump administration is considering measures to halt a surge of Central American families and unaccompanied minors coming across the Mexican border, including a proposal to separate parents from their children, according to officials with knowledge of the plans.

These measures, described on the condition of anonymity because they have not been publicly disclosed, would also crack down on migrants living in the United States illegally who send for their children. That aspect of the effort would use data collected by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to target parents for deportation after they attempt to regain custody of their children from government shelters.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has previously considered some of these proposals, but there is renewed urgency within the administration to address an abrupt reversal of what had been a sharp decline in illegal immigration since Trump took office in January.

In November, U.S. agents took into custody 7,018 families, or "family units," along the border with Mexico, a 45 percent increase over the previous month, the latest DHS statistics show. The number of "unaccompanied alien children," or UAC, was up ­­26 percent.
Children's shelters operated by HHS are at maximum capacity or "dangerously close to it," an official from the agency said. Overall, the number of migrants detained last month along the Mexico border, 39,006, was the highest monthly total since Trump became president, according to DHS figures.

The proposals, which have been presented for approval to new DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, were developed by career officials at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other DHS agencies, administration officials said.

Tyler Houlton, a DHS spokesman, confirmed the agency has "reviewed procedural, policy, regulatory and legislative changes" to deter migrants. Without giving further details, he said some of the measures "have been approved," and DHS is working with other federal agencies "to implement them in the near future."

"The administration is committed to using all legal tools at its disposal to secure our nation's borders, and as a result we are continuing to review additional policy options," Houlton said.

The most contentious ­proposal — to separate families in detention — would keep adults in federal custody while sending their children to HHS shelters. This was floated in March by then-Secretary of Homeland Security John F. Kelly, who is now White House chief of staff. He told CNN at the time that the children would be "well cared for as we deal with their parents."

Kelly did not move forward with the plan, in part because of the backlash it triggered, administration officials said, and also because illegal migration had plunged to historic lows.

Trump administration officials described the measures as unpalatable but necessarily tough policy options to discourage Central American families from embarking on the long, dangerous journey to the border — or hiring smugglers to bring their children north. 

"People aren't going to stop coming unless there are consequences to illegal entry," one DHS official said.

Migrants from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras represent the largest share of families and children taken into U.S. custody along the border, with many telling border agents that they fear for their lives if sent back to their home countries. The three nations, known as the "Northern Triangle" of Central America, are crippled by gang violence and homicide rates that are among the world's highest.


WP
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Fri 22 Dec, 2017 09:00 am
US ambassador to Netherlands describes own words as 'fake news'
Quote:
Trump’s new choice for ambassador, Pete Hoekstra, who was only sworn in by the vice president, Mike Pence, on 11 December, was being interviewed for current affairs programme Nieuwsuur by reporter Wouter Zwart.

Zwart says: “You mentioned in a debate that there are no-go zones in the Netherlands, and that cars and politicians are being set on fire in the Netherlands.”

Hoekstra replies: “I didn’t say that. This is actually an incorrect statement. We would call it fake news.”

Hoekstra is then shown clips of him saying: “The Islamic movement has now gotten to a point where they have put Europe into chaos. Chaos in the Netherlands, there are cars being burnt, there are politicians that are being burnt ... and yes there are no-go zones in the Netherlands.”

Challenged about having called this “fake news”, Hoekstra then went on to deny to Zwart that he had in fact used the phrase “fake news”.

“I didn’t call that fake news. I didn’t use the words today. I don’t think I did.”

Hoekstra, who was born in Groningen in the Netherlands, was a Republican Congressman for Michigan between 1993 and 2011, and served as chair of the House Intelligence Committee for two years during that time.


Original (Dutch) video and report Amerikaanse ambassadeur noemt eigen uitspraken 'nepnieuws'
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.83 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 04:19:14