192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:20 pm
@Frugal1,
wrong on both counts. As per usual. the only thing you got right in that is the KKK is a rtacist organization. all the rest islbogus.
Frugal1
 
  -3  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:25 pm
@MontereyJack,
MJ starts the new year off with two strikes.
cicerone imposter
 
  6  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:26 pm
@Frugal1,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-is-a-bigot-and-a-racist/2015/12/01/a2a47b96-9872-11e5-8917-653b65c809eb_story.html?utm_term=.39cf6fa776eb

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jun/16/10-biggest-falsehoods-year-trump/

Yes, Trump is a racial bigot, a liar, and a scammer of many people. He's what's called a "scum."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/13/donald-trumps-chicago-scam/?utm_term=.0f2ccd7fd43a

We all know about Trump's lies on Obama's birth place. He pushed that for five years.
Frugal1
 
  -4  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:29 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Steerike!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  6  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:31 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Trump is the guy who saw "thousands and thousands of people cheering" when the twin towers came down.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/22/donald-trump/fact-checking-trumps-claim-thousands-new-jersey-ch/

How can anyone believe such a liar? His imaginations aren't even realistic!
0 Replies
 
Frugal1
 
  -2  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:40 pm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1G0bkdVEAAMLFy.jpg:large
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  3  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:44 pm
@Frugal1,
Quote:
we know that Donald Trump is not a racist human being.


How do WE know this?
Frugal1
 
  -3  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:46 pm
@reasoning logic,
Judge the man by his actions
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:47 pm
@reasoning logic,
Trump just didn't rent to blacks, and paid for a full page ad in the NYT to execute five innocent blacks even though they were found innocent.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/23/nyregion/trump-draws-criticism-for-ad-he-ran-after-jogger-attack.html
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  5  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:48 pm
@Frugal1,
you've whiffed every single time you've come to bat, frug.
cicerone imposter
 
  5  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:50 pm
@MontereyJack,
Sadly, he's going to be our next president; a racial bigot, liar and scammer of many people.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/11/donald-trump-s-charity-is-a-money-making-scam.html
0 Replies
 
Frugal1
 
  -2  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:51 pm
@MontereyJack,
You've taken one too many balls to the face, MJ.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  5  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:52 pm
@Frugal1,
WE do. He wouldn't rent apartments in his buildings to black people, and coded their applications "C" for colored. He stonewalled his eventual agreement to the government to rent and maintained the practice. He's a bigot and a racist.
0 Replies
 
Frugal1
 
  -2  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:53 pm


Thank God that nasty woman is NOT going to be our next POTUS.
Trump will do a fine job while serving his term(s).
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  7  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:54 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Trump has intel data no one else knows.
Quote:
President-elect Donald J. Trump, expressing lingering skepticism about intelligence assessments of Russian interference in the election, said on Saturday evening that he knew “things that other people don’t know” about the hacking, and that the information would be revealed “on Tuesday or Wednesday.”

...He added: “And I know a lot about hacking. And hacking is a very hard thing to prove. So it could be somebody else. And I also know things that other people don’t know, and so they cannot be sure of the situation.”
LINK

There is nothing this man cannot do. No problem he cannot solve. No mystery he cannot unravel. No subject on which he is not an expert, a genius even. Take for one example, governmental communications systems:
Quote:
Mr. Trump, who does not use email, also advised people to avoid computers when dealing with delicate material. “It’s very important, if you have something really important, write it out and have it delivered by courier, the old-fashioned way, because I’ll tell you what, no computer is safe,” Mr. Trump said.

“I don’t care what they say, no computer is safe,” he added. “I have a boy who’s 10 years old; he can do anything with a computer. You want something to really go without detection, write it out and have it sent by courier.”



Does that mean the almighty Trump's various forms of alleged omniscience, omnipotence, and/or omnipresence may be thwarted through the use of a courier? One thing is clear, however, he plagues mankind with the magnitude of his asininity.


Frugal1
 
  -2  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 01:57 pm
It's as if DL has been sleeping since 2008...
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 02:41 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

"Politics is the shadow cast by business" - John Dewey
Quote:
The execution of the Observer journalist Farzad Bazoft on 15 March 1990, ordered by Saddam Hussein, provoked outrage around the world. Yet later that same day Margaret Thatcher and her government decided not to take any action, against what ministers admitted was a “ruthless” regime, for fear of jeopardising lucrative exports to Iraq.

In memos written two years after Saddam used mustard gas to slaughter more than 3,000 Kurds and only months before he marched into Kuwait, sparking war, newly released cabinet documents reveal that trade was still the uppermost concern for ministers.
$$$$$

Obvious relevance here to Trump's financial interests/entanglements in Russia (not to mention Exxon and Tillerson, etc)


It is bemusing to find the Guardian opening 2017 with an article describing how an "evil advisor" to one of Thatcher's cabinet ministers actually urged the avoidance of war or reprisals on Iraq or Saddam in 1991, following his execution of a free-lance Iranian reporter, then working on an assignment for the Guardian. In the article the Guardian editor takes a very dim view of the Thatcher government that, "had consistently turned a blind eye to atrocities committed by Saddam".

This is a bit of rather breathtaking hypocrisy coming from the paper that later pilloried British PM Tony Blair for joining the U.S.in separate actions in the following decade to evict Saddam from Kuwait and later remove him from power.

The fact is that after 1990 most of Saddam's new weapons purchases were from Western European nations, France in particular, and the subsequent economic sanctions against Saddam were widely evaded by European countries, the UK included. So the point about economic interests is certainly valid. However there is nothing either new or remarkable in that - consider Obama's recent agreement with Iran.

That said the salient issue here is just what point Blatham is attempting to make, and How Donald Trump's business ventures in the property development, travel and entertainment industries might be related to it.

Given that Sec. State John Kerry is married to the, probably even richer, widow of the Heinz company paterfamilias - the ketchup queen of the world I'm surprised that Blatham isn't worried about Kerry as well.

It appears Blatham is suggesting that the economic interests of countries often influence their decisions about foreign policy, and that because Trump has significant economic interests he might .... well that part of Blatham's vague insinuations isn't very clear.

The Guardian article is itself an hypocritical, contemptable piece of ****, and It appears that Blatham is using it to show off his John Dewey quote ..... or something like that. The result is a slightly polished, but illogical turd. Hard to figure just what might be the logic or insight behind all this. It's not easy being a highly prolific, shallow propagandist , and I suppose stupid missteps like this are inevitable.....

Happy New Year !
blatham
 
  4  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 02:56 pm
It looks like Sean Spicer is going to be a complete douchebag.
Quote:
President-elect Donald Trump’s press secretary pick questioned Sunday whether Hillary Clinton will be “punished” for what he said were her attempts to influence the election.

When asked about the U.S. intelligence assessment that Russian hackers tried to influence the presidential election in favor of Trump during a Sunday segment on ABC’s “This Week," Sean Spicer turned the question around.

“When are we going to start talking about the other side of this? Which is: What did Hillary Clinton do to influence the election? Is she being punished in any way?” Spicer asked, referencing the fact the Democratic nominee received debate questions ahead of time during the primary.

...Why aren’t we talking about ... other influences on the election?” he asked.

“Why aren’t we talking about Hillary Clinton getting debate questions ahead of time?
LINK
The least important part of this is "questions" in the plural. It was a single question so far as I can discover (but note that the reporting here also makes that mistake). And we'll note it was absolutely appropriate for CNN to can Brazille for this.

The obvious douchebaggery from Spicer here is trying to draw an equivalence between one candidate receiving a debate question ahead of time with an unfriendly foreign nation's insertion into the US election in an effort to influence which candidate would be victorious.


Debra Law
 
  2  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 03:00 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Because he's a level-headed, big-hearted and amazingly sane sort. This happened Friday.
Quote:
Trump kicks biographer off golf course
Harry Hurt had written a critical book about the president-elect.
LINK

Interesting detail in there is David Koch as part of the foursome. I am still trying to get a better grasp of how/where the Koch boys and the Trump crowd are moving in tandem or in opposition.


Another example of Trump's thin skin and compulsive need to retaliate. Who is the person Trump has appointed to be his modern-day J. Edgar Hoover? you know, the guy who will compile useful dossiers on all of Trump's enemies, real or perceived? And happy new year's day to all of Trump's enemies ... LOVE! (Meaning, Trump loves his new position of power and he remembers all of his "many enemies".)
blatham
 
  2  
Sun 1 Jan, 2017 03:07 pm
Hell of an interesting (longish) piece on Russia and Putin:
Quote:
As the definitions of war and peace have blurred, creating impossibly vast front lines and impossibly vague boundaries of conflict, Putin has launched a kind of global imperialist insurgency. The Kremlin aggressively promotes an alternate ideological base to expand an illiberal world order in which the rights and freedoms that most Americans feel are essential to democracy don’t necessarily exist. It backs this up with military, economic, cultural and diplomatic resources. Through a combination of leveraging hard power and embracing the role of permanent disruptor — hacker, mercenary, rule-breaker, liar, thief — Putin works to ensure that Russia cannot be excluded from global power.

Putin tries to define recent history as an anomaly — where the world built with American sweat and ingenuity and blood and sacrifice, by the society founded on American exceptionalism, is a thing to be erased and corrected. The Russian version of exceptionalism is not a reflection of aspirational character, but a requirement that Russia remain distinct and apart from the world. Until we understand this, and that America is defined as the glavny protivnik (the ‘main enemy’) of Russia, we will never speak to Putin’s Russia in a language it can understand.
LINK
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/12/2025 at 12:34:16