@Cycloptichorn,
Quote:Well, you're removing the actual argument being made and substituting it with a straw-man, so of COURSE it sounds melodramatic.
What do you presume the actual argument being made is and just who is making it?
Trump has been, repeatedly, referred to as Putin's puppet in this forum and externally. Whether or not you have ever made the argument that he has been turned into a puppet by Putin being able to blackmail him is something I would have to search for, but I don't need to know that it's not at all a strawman. You very recently advised that you don't pay much attention to the views of your fellow liberals because you don't need them to tell you what you think and I get that you prefer to focus on telling them and everyone else what you think and why those who disagree with you are wrong (and they know it!), but if you're going to defend the people you don't care to listen to, it would make your defense a tad stronger if you knew what you were defending.
Blickers very recently in this thread asserted with total conviction that Putin had Trump on strings because he also had the goods on his money laundering. Considering that Trump hasn't attempted to withdraw the US or it's support from NATO nor lifted the sanctions imposed on Russia for both their adventurism in The Ukraine and leaking hacked email from Podesta and the DNC, the assertion is not simply melodramatic, it's absurd. Blickers doesn't even contend that Trump actually has paid the piper, his response is "He (Trump) can't get anything done...even his betrayal of the US and the West" or "Wait, there's still time."
Olivier asserts that the Kremlin is currently engaged in a hostile takeover of the White House, and you don't consider that melodramatic? If not, why not, because it is accurate?
These arguments and others (Just take a look at BillW's posts over a period of hours) sound melodramatic because they are melodramatic.
You are very proud of the research you believe buttresses your positions and so I imagine you will be very glad to present how you conclude the Russian Dossier has been proven to be accurate. It must be flying way below the radar because I've not seen it, but then I'm not jacked into a 24 hour detailed news feed so it's quite possible I missed it. And the MSM's sense of decorum and reluctance to venture into the salacious when it comes to a president would explain why proof of Trump's fondness for Golden Showers was not highlighted.