192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  4  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 07:00 am
These people aren't playing around.
Quote:
Yes, Democrats do too, to a degree. But the Democratic left was furious with the Obama administration for its diffident approach to filling judicial vacancies. There has never been anything like the weaponizing of the federal judiciary that is currently taking place. Seventeen of President Trump’s 18 nominees to the federal appeals courts are connected to the Federalist Society. Donald McGahn, the White House counsel, joked at the Federalist Society’s annual convention in Washington last week that it was “completely false” that the Trump administration was outsourcing to the group the task of finding judicial nominees. “I’ve been a member of the Federalist Society since law school,” Mr. McGahn said. “Still am, so frankly it seems like it’s been in-sourced.”
NYT
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 07:24 am
I hope this doesn't send anyone into paroxysms of denial.

Quote:
Why is it always Orwell o’clock? Why is everything mildly unpleasant about government instantly Orwellian? Why is every banal propaganda effort obviously 1984 sprung to life? Why is it all as crushingly predictable as the Orwell Prize, the outstandingly foreseeable new Churchill And Orwell double biography, and now a new life-size bronze Orwell statue outside the BBC?

There is a simplicity and a clarity to Orwell’s prose. It flows nicely. But there is also nothing special about it other than the fact it has been canonised as the ultimate in English authorial excellence.
(...)

The secret of Orwell’s appeal lies in his rhetoric: everything is simple, everything is right or wrong, and everything—if you only listened to him—can finally be solved. George Orwell in fact reads nothing like a political thinker but like a Sunday morning country vicar: incredibly English, quietly demagogic, and thirsting for justice to be done.

Why I've Had Enough of George Orwell

A good writer, worth reading, but probably not worthy of beatification.
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 08:08 am
Quote:
The Texas native has built a reputation on Capitol Hill as a fierce advocate for the oil and gas industry and a reliable vote for conservative legislation. A member of the Freedom Caucus, Barton regularly receives top scores from socially conservative groups such as the Family Research Council that analyze members’ stances on positions such as abortion and gay rights.
WP
I gather that he sent photos of his weewee to at least one woman and to spice things up further, a video of himself jerking off. Barton has been a steadfast and consistent supporter of the oil industry. Those folks and their allies won't want this guy to be removed.
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 08:21 am
@hightor,
Quote:
A good writer, worth reading, but probably not worthy of beatification.
The author here is asking rather a lot of Orwell. Even if we understand that he was voicing anti-Semitic notions, that's quite irrelevant to the genius of "Politics and the English Language", for example. And that Orwell made political predictions that turned out rather wrong, that does not diminish his perceptions as to how a lot of propaganda gets done. Beatification would be silly as it almost always (always?) is. But Orwell was certainly more than just a fine writer.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 08:26 am
Winner of today's No ****, Sherlock award:
Quote:
but the political crisis we confront has encouraged a great many who are neither scribes nor broadcasters to consider why journalism matters to a democracy. Among the many helpful books and articles on this subject, I particularly recommend a 2009 essay by Paul Starr, a Princeton University professor.

One of his central observations, from cross-national studies: The lower the circulation of newspapers in a given country, the higher the level of corruption. Journalism, it turns out, is an essential restraint on abuses by the powers-that-be, and all the more so when the checks and balances inside government are faltering.
WP
farmerman
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 08:52 am
@blatham,
you oughta take a day off. Im trying not to become depressed.
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 09:22 am
@farmerman,
I suspect that a single day won't do the trick.

Edit: Just realizing today is thanksgiving for you mis-oriented people in America. A day off it is.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 09:41 am
@Builder,
amusing, disturbing and realistic?
ehBeth
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 09:43 am
@Blickers,
Since you've entirely missed the point, we'll just let you wander along.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 10:39 am
Quote:
Facebook plans to let people see if they had "liked" pages created by "foreign actors" to spread propaganda during the US presidential election.

The social network has previously said as many as 126 million Americans may have seen content uploaded by Russia-based agents over the past two years.

It is building a tool to let people see whether they had followed now-deleted pages made by the Russia-based Internet Research Agency.

The tool will be launched in December.

The Internet Research Agency was behind hundreds of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter accounts and posted thousands of politically-charged messages.

Many of the pages such as Heart Of Texas, Being Patriotic and Secured Borders were designed to look like they were created by US citizens.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42096045
Lash
 
  1  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 02:53 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

Since the last presidential election, in these fora, [Lash] has labeled herself a Republican and a Trump supporter.

This is just a lie, for anyone actually wondering.
Setanta
 
  -1  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 03:10 pm
@Lash,
You have described Plump as your president, and the Republican Party as your party. There's a liar here, but it's not me.
Builder
 
  -1  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 03:30 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
amusing, disturbing and realistic?


Amusing, in that everyone is currently up in arms about the possibility that someone other than Americans could possibly influence what is basically a popularity contest, consisting mostly of smoke and mirrors.

Disturbing that a job described as the most powerful and influential position on the planet, can be gifted to anybody with enough corporate exposure, or prior popularity on daytime television, and zero actual experience in such a role.

Realistic? It's more surreal than any "reality" television show in existence, and may go down, historically speaking, as the most surreal period in politics, as we know it.

The corporate media, today, and for quite some time now, is a branch of the disinformation industry, and even a cursory knowledge of operation mockingbird's undoubted success, gives me pause to look, every time now, at what might be the real story, behind the one they're highlighting, at any given moment.

Take the recent mass shooting at LA. It dropped out of the headlines faster than last week's NFL scores.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 03:55 pm
@Setanta,
You’re a liar.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 03:56 pm
The day is not over but wanted to get this New Yorker piece noted here
Quote:
During the 2016 election, the directions from the Kremlin were less subtle than usual. “Me and my colleagues, we were given a clear instruction: to show Donald Trump in a positive way, and his opponent, Hillary Clinton, in a negative way,” he said in his speech. In a later interview, he explained to me how the instructions were relayed. “Sometimes it was a phone call. Sometimes it was a conversation,” he told me. “If Donald Trump has a successful press conference, we broadcast it for sure. And if something goes wrong with Clinton, we underline it.”

Skorobutov said in his speech that the pro-Trump perspective extended from Kremlin-controlled media to the Moscow élite.

“There was even a slogan among Russian political élite,” he said. “ ‘Trump is our president.’ And, when he won the elections, on 9th November, 2016, Russian Parliament or State Duma even applauded him and arranged a champagne party celebrating the victory of Donald Trump.” That night, Skorobutov and his colleagues played clips of the party on the news.

Ryan Lizza
Builder
 
  -1  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 04:23 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
The day is not over but wanted to get this New Yorker piece noted here


Interesting how these "articles" never go into the "why" of the situation, meaning more than simple financial benefits, or future deals, but the fact that the election "decision" averted possible global war.


Russia's actions in Syria highlighted the MSM hypocrisy surrounding who is funding IS or ISIS in the region, and the neoliberal agenda, generally speaking, which includes invasion of Iran, with the possiblility of involving both China, and Russia, in conflict that would probably have very serious implications for everyone on the planet.

Why is this aspect not a part of your campaign here, blatham?
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 07:33 pm
I mentioned a few days ago, the significance of the situation in Saudi Arabia, to prez Trump's behind-the-scenes activities.

Here's the Corbett report, on the situation.

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=dkXyWPVkqcg
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 08:01 pm
@izzythepush,
Here's one for our local fan of the BBC.

It doesn't actually surprise me that this org is openly attacking president Trump, when you understand that he's attempting to expose the organised paedophilia currently pervading US political circles.

source

Quote:
To explain the reasoning behind abandoning the investigation and why she chose to leave the BBC, MacKean stated, “The reason for dropping Newsnight’s story was never explained, even by the multi-million pound independent inquiry that later found the story should have run. Meirion [Jones] and I were isolated, if not marooned, and the BBC, throughout my career a benevolent employer, had come to feel like a hostile environment.”

Her work did not go unnoticed, however. The fact that the BBC chose to cover up this story and drop MacKean’s piece became public, and soon after the facts began to unravel. It wasn’t until 2014 that all (or at least most) of the details surrounding Savile’s sexual abuse victims came to light, exposing that he had sexually abused at least 500 children and even had sex with dead bodies.

Not only did he abuse children, but he also sexually abused countless adults of all ages, all the way up to 75 years old. Much of the abuse took place at hospitals, as he volunteered many of his hours there. Savile even had complete access to Leeds General Infirmary for five decades, where he raped and sexually abused children and adults, male and female, all over the hospital. Savile even performed “sexual acts” on dead bodies, and even bragged about making jewelry out of a man’s glass eyeball.

0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 09:41 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

The Paris Accord was not adopted by treaty, so your thesis is false. If it had been a treaty, it would have required two-thirds of the Senate to rescind it, and that did not and would not happen. It helps to inform oneself before making pronouncements on what is or is not constitutional.


The states are also not ratifying a treaty, they are simply vowing to live within the accords of the treaty, which is a continuation of what they have been doing in the past already.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 09:54 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
The Texas native has built a reputation on Capitol Hill as a fierce advocate for the oil and gas industry and a reliable vote for conservative legislation. A member of the Freedom Caucus, Barton regularly receives top scores from socially conservative groups such as the Family Research Council that analyze members’ stances on positions such as abortion and gay rights.
WP
I gather that he sent photos of his weewee to at least one woman and to spice things up further, a video of himself jerking off. Barton has been a steadfast and consistent supporter of the oil industry. Those folks and their allies won't want this guy to be removed.


Trouble is, his district is safely a teabag party district anyways. The worst they could do is let him run again next year. Then even if he doesn't win (not likely anyways I'm sure), the Republicans would take the seat back in another 2 years. But, hmmmmm, the dems would then have the seat for impeachment time - don't run Barton off! It's the best thing going.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.77 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 08:10:52