192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
hightor
 
  4  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 04:00 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Are you as assiduous when it comes to left-wing conspiracy tales?

I think so.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 04:05 pm
@hightor,
I don't, but who can say?
hightor
 
  5  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 04:11 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Throw a couple at me and we'll see.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 04:15 pm
@hightor,
Trump colluded with the Russian to win the presidency
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 04:17 pm
@hightor,
GW Bush used his influence to get out of the Vietnam War
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 04:18 pm
@hightor,
GW Bush and Dick Cheney outed Valarie Plamme
Cycloptichorn
 
  5  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 05:13 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
That's a proven fact, not a conspiracy.

Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn
 
  4  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 05:17 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/05/audit-irs-scrutiny-liberal-non-profits-243497

Quote:
A new report on the IRS’s treatment of nonprofit groups indicates the agency subjected numerous liberal-leaning groups to extra scrutiny when they sought tax-exempt status, the latest wrinkle in a saga that has mostly focused on how conservative groups were treated.

While the audit released Thursday by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration doesn't discuss the political leanings of the additional groups it identified, the criteria used by the IRS to flag groups based on their names or policy positions included left-leaning organizations and causes like “ACORN Successors,” “Green Energy,” “Medical Marijuana,” and “Progressive.”


This entire line of attack on the IRS by Conservatives was bullshit. All along. There was no systematic persecution of Republican/Conservative groups by the IRS at all.

Not that I expect any one of you to ever admit it out loud.

Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn
 
  4  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 05:18 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Trump colluded with the Russian to win the presidency


As for this one, it's not confirmed yet publicly but almost certainly true. If you like, I can go into detail about how I think it happened.

Cycloptichorn
BillW
 
  2  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 05:42 pm
Moron for the Tillerman.........Cat Stevens
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 05:54 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Most Americans support stronger gun laws -- laws that would reduce deaths.

Laws that would have very little impact on deaths.

I know liberals hate facts. But facts are still important.


Quote:
But Republicans in Congress stand in the way. They fear alienating their primary voters and the National Rifle Association.

Same with a lot of Democrats.
0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  -2  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 05:58 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Trump colluded with the Russian to win the presidency


Fake news.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:02 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Who really gives a damn about how you think it happened?
0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  -2  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:03 pm
The Dark Side is in trouble

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/05/challenge-to-pelosi-top-dem-lashes-out-at-party-leaders-says-pass-torch.html

Challenge to Pelosi: Top Dem lashes out at party leaders, says 'pass the torch'

Quote:
A top House Democrat declared Thursday that it’s time to “pass the torch” to a new generation of party leaders, in a very public swipe at Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants that revived simmering tensions inside the caucus.

Eight-term Rep. Linda Sanchez of California, in an interview with C-SPAN, said it's "time to pass the torch to a new generation of leaders, and I want to be a part of that transition. I want to see that happen."
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:03 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Maybe you heard of a guy named Armitage?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:05 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
But you can't blame people for looking primarily at the hardware end of the relationship versus actually trying to change human behavior.

I can when they want to ban hardware that there is no good reason to ban.


hightor wrote:
On paper it seems sensible to restrict access to particular types of weapons, availability of particular kinds of ammunition,

Every time someone says "sensible" or "common sense" they are invariably calling for an outrageous civil rights violation.

That said, which types of weapons and which types of ammunition? And what would be a good reason for each specific ban?


hightor wrote:
and number of guns a consumer can buy at a time

Why should important gun collections be broken up into separate pieces? Why should someone who wants to buy a couple hundred guns have to wait in order to buy them?


hightor wrote:
The glamorization of gun culture, the sheer ubiquity of guns in our movies, TV shows, and on the streets, and the preoccupation with killing human beings in general needs to be dialed back. Over the past thirty years the gun lobby and the gun industry have worked assiduously to portray firearms as little more than fashion accessories, badges of patriotism not much different than American flag lapel buttons. Introducing a few restrictions would at least signify that we reject the "wild west" model for our neighborhoods and that the glorification of firearms -- "gun culture" -- is, well, an adolescent preoccupation with power and delusory "freedom".

America is never going to reject our heritage as a free country.


hightor wrote:
While Nate Silver's organization publishes great statistical research and Libresco makes good points, it's never good to base your conclusions on one study that you happen to agree with. There are other peer-reviewed studies which have come to slightly different conclusions about the efficacy of gun control.
Quote:
In a comprehensive review of firearm-control legislation worldwide, we identified a range of studies examining the association between firearm-related laws and firearm deaths. Three general observations emerge from this analysis:
1) The simultaneous implementation of laws targeting multiple elements of firearms regulations reduced firearm-related deaths in certain countries;
2) some specific restrictions on purchase, access, and use of firearms are associated with reductions in firearm deaths;
3) challenges in ecological design and the execution of studies limit the confidence in study findings and the conclusions that can be derived from them.

What Do We Know About the Association Between Firearm Legislation and Firearm-Related Injuries?

Is someone who is killed with a gun any more dead than someone killed with a knife?

The left's hysteria over the method that is used to kill someone is a bit silly.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:08 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
The fact that a majority of Americans consider random cops killing of black people a non-issue, is exactly why the athletes are doing the right thing: the American people needs to be educated so they understand that it is an important issue. More important than any flag or game.

BLM's call for black people to be able to murder police officers with impunity is hardly an issue of any importance.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:09 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Quote:
The Debunked IRS Targeting Scandal Shows There Is No Sane Wing of the GOP

It's infuriating. And we have people on this forum who still repeat this stinking canard even though it was debunked years ago.

The Obama Administration's whitewash is hardly a debunking. We need a special prosecutor to investigate and prosecute all the crimes of the Obama Administration.


hightor wrote:
I heard Michael Moore interviewed yesterday...he thinks Trump may win re-election, especially if the Dems nominate a career politician.

Trump WILL win reelection. The Republicans are going to hold the White House for the next 20 years.


hightor wrote:
Two or three more conservative Justices and you can kiss democracy in the USA goodbye.

Democracy is fine. It's liberalism that's doomed.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:12 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
WaPo: NRA says it supports regulations on 'bump stock'; top House Republicans say they’re open to legislation
Quote:
The National Rifle Association released a statement Thursday afternoon saying that it will support regulations on "bump stocks."

"The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations," NRA officials Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox said in a statement.

Top House Republicans said they will consider restricting "bump stocks," the firearm accessory used to accelerate gunfire in the Las Vegas massacre, opening the door to heightened regulation in response to the tragedy.

... ... ...

NRA: NRA's Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox Issue Joint Statemen

Only pass it if the SHARE Act is included. 2 Cents
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Thu 5 Oct, 2017 06:13 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That's a proven fact, not a conspiracy.

No. It's a proven fact that Plame was outed by Richard Armitage at the State Department.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 09:48:47