monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

President Trump called for a "larger, tougher and more specific," travel ban in response to a terrorist attack that took place in London early Friday morning.

"Another attack in London by a loser terrorist.These are sick and demented people who were in the sights of Scotland Yard. Must be proactive!"

"Loser terrorists must be dealt with in a much tougher manner.The internet is their main recruitment tool which we must cut off & use better!" Trump continued in a subsequent tweet.

"The travel ban into the United States should be far larger, tougher and more specific-but stupidly, that would not be politically correct!"

[... ... ...]
Coulter's frustration with Trump has been building for months, but her current fury represents a dramatic escalation. In addition to original messages like the ones above [see in link], she has been retweeting video clips of Trump supporters burning their “Make America Great Again” hats.

In a Thursday-afternoon interview on WBAL radio in Baltimore, Coulter told host Derek Hunter, a contributing editor at the Daily Caller, that Trump is “the worst negotiator I've ever seen.”

So what are your thoughts on DACA? Do you think immigrants who were brought over as babies should have a pathway to citizenship?

As for the agreement, not sure about it. Trump seems to be denying it.

The biggest mistake of Ronald Reagan was the amnesty to illegal immigrants.

After this amnesty the invasion of illegal immigrants increased waiting for a next president giving them amnesty again.

These "dreamers" at their will or not, are part of families which have entered illegally to the US.

Giving them amnesty will cause demands to do the same with the rest of illegal immigrants, and this plague will never stop.

I don't agree with citizenship as that is going to continue to set a bad example just like Reagans amnesty did in the 80's.

DACA was unconstitutional and should never have been implemented.

Is DACA unconstitutional?

The short answer is, the Supreme Court has yet to rule on its constitutionality, so calling it “unconstitutional” is presumptive. And while the program has vocal opponents, legal experts largely argue that the program is not only constitutional but based on commonplace practices.

What the courts have decided

In June 2016, the Supreme Court ruled 4-4 in a case that challenged Obama’s DACA program. The court remained deadlocked due to the Senate’s refusal to have confirmation hearings for Obama’s Supreme Court Justice nominee, Judge Merrick Garland. With Trump-nominated Justice Neil Gorsuch, a staunch conservative, now on the court, it is unlikely DACA would survive a Supreme Court challenge—not to mention the question of whether the Trump administration would even defend the program.

So you believe the sins of the parents should be visited on the kids?

I don't know if it was unconstitutional, seems as though that is thrown out a lot without the reasoning behind it.

Of course this argument is already debated since Trump terminated the DACA.

What powers in the Constitution granted Obama the right to grant Social Security #'s and permission to work in the US for illegal immigrants?

I saw the Nixon press conference on TV when it happened. Rather's comment, far from inane, was a jab back at the fading president, it was clear to see at the time. Coming at a time when tradition and respect was considered normal at the time, it was quite remarkable.

When Schumer and Pelosi lied about there being a deal after the 'bipartisan' dinner, it's clear they love throwing a wrench into the works.

But yes, what will they do. Trump's new nickname from the far right loons, 'Amnesty Don'. They used to call Lindsey Graham, 'Lindsey Grahamnesty'.

The large majority of white people in this country are descended from immigrants who came to America after 1900.

In other words, when our grandparents first came over, the guy at Ellis Island just asked for their birth certificate, made a half-hearted attempt not to mangle their name too badly on the admittance paper, and in they came. And America grew strong and great.

Here we have kids who know no other life but America, who are indistinguishable from native born Americans, and you try to portray this as a plague that will doom us. When actually, it is just a continuation of the thing which brought the country to greatness.

If you deny the grown up kids the right to apply for citizenship, then you are punishing them for something they had no control over regardless of allowing them to work in the country.

As far as what right, there are many rights the president has. The following is helpful in explaining the right Obama had for DACA.

Man, this is one of the dumbest posts I've ever read. Literally every one of your assumptions and assertions is incorrect.

So?

In those years the law of immigration was different.

You missed the point completely, I reckon.

As a corporate capitalist economy, growth is the only thing that matters, so immigration, even illegal immigration, adds to the coffers of govt in one way or another.

If you want to focus upon the costs of supporting those immigrants, while not acknowledging the costs of those already on welfare (wall street is the biggest recipient of welfare at present) your argument is void of rationale.

Get out of here!