192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 02:20 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

Yeah, Olivier, I noticed too that McG changed your post and then tried to pass off his changed version as what you had said, when it wasn't at all what you had said. THAT IS DEEPLY UNETHICAL, McG.

Thanks. I didn't mention it because I doubt McG has any use for ethics. Ethics require some autonomous thinking, while goons like him only follow their leader.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 02:34 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

What does one photo prove emmett? We could spend the next 2 days trading posts containing photos of left-wingers and right-wingers screaming at people.

At the least, it shows their free speech is not threatened: if the goons can shout at people so hard, certainly they can speak normally too, no?

emmett grogan
 
  3  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 02:49 pm
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
wmwcjr
 
  2  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 03:42 pm
@emmett grogan,
classic bullies
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 04:21 pm
@cameronleon,
Quote:
Any psychologist can confirm what I just said.


You are making many claims that are making people laugh at you for your lack of knowledge. Do you really think that psychologist are exempt from cluster b disorders? Psychologist don't need a disorder just to have a difference in opinion but for you to bring psychologists into your discussion and suggest that they would somehow all agree seems a bit silly.
0 Replies
 
emmett grogan
 
  4  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 04:34 pm
@wmwcjr,
Classic dyed in the wool bullies.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:18 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

What does one photo prove emmett? We could spend the next 2 days trading posts containing photos of left-wingers and right-wingers screaming at people.

At the least, it shows their free speech is not threatened: if the goons can shout at people so hard, certainly they can speak normally too, no?




Really?

It's amazing what you can divine from a single photo of two men.

So if I produce a photo that shows someone screaming in the face of a woman wearing a MAGA ball cap it will show that free speech is threatened?
roger
 
  4  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:31 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:



So if I produce a photo that shows someone screaming in the face of a woman wearing a MAGA ball cap it will show that free speech is threatened?
[/quote]

No, it would prove we still have free speech.


You gotta have the right frame of mind for this stuff.
blatham
 
  4  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:40 pm
I had never seen this. Quite brilliant. h/t Jeet Heer


Olivier5
 
  3  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:41 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Yes, one can read a lot from one single picture. It takes a modicum of logic and observation skills. Try and follow the reasoning. It goes like this: IF one can move mountains, one can move molehills. Therefore, if one can scream at the top of one's lung, one can also speak normally. Nobody is preventing these guys with a MAGA cap to yell. Therefore nobody prevents them to speak.

That's as simple as I can make it.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:44 pm
@cameronleon,
Somebody actually wrote this.

Quote:
The reaction of liberals show as a consequence of their actions, that they are people with poor personality. Any psychologist can confirm what I just said.

0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:46 pm
@roger,
Which frame of mind is being used by liberals who choose violence to stifle conservative speakers from giving a talk at such free thought establishments like Berkeley?

Does that prove we have free speech?
ehBeth
 
  3  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:49 pm
@blatham,
Brilliant in his day.

RIP Mr. Lewis.

(I need that music)
0 Replies
 
emmett grogan
 
  2  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:53 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:

So if I produce a photo that shows someone screaming in the face of a woman wearing a MAGA ball cap it will show that free speech is threatened?


No.

Mainly because you can't.

Just for you:

A bunch of free speech advocates

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nate-thayer.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F02%2Flwk4.jpg&f=1
0 Replies
 
emmett grogan
 
  2  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:55 pm
@blatham,
Some of his 60's stuff for Paramount is golden.
0 Replies
 
ossobucotemp
 
  2  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 05:58 pm
@blatham,
Thanks for the link
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  7  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 06:03 pm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHtTLGHUIAA0zIv.jpg

The remark that accompanied this tweeted photo
Quote:
Tough crowd in Hollywood
roger
 
  5  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 06:07 pm
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

Which frame of mind is being used by liberals who choose violence to stifle conservative speakers from giving a talk at such free thought establishments like Berkeley?

Does that prove we have free speech?


I'm going to guess that whatever the right frame of mind is, you don't have it.
0 Replies
 
ossobucotemp
 
  3  
Sun 20 Aug, 2017 06:14 pm
@blatham,






I'm related to early people in Hollywood, not worked in it myself, except for proofreading.
On the other hand, I remember a batch of the history.
I'll be watching..












 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.47 seconds on 11/01/2024 at 12:25:42