192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 09:47 am
@revelette1,
I know you didn't. That's why I said it's better to have the original source which isn't what I originally posted.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 09:49 am
Quote:
A UK hacker reportedly fooled top White House officials into engaging in fake email exchanges.
The self-proclaimed "email prankster" convinced a senior cyber security adviser he was the president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, CNN says.
He also goaded the then media chief, Anthony Scaramucci, in the guise of ex-chief of staff Reince Priebus.
Concerns about cyber security are running high amid claims hackers interfered in the US election.
The White House told CNN it was investigating the latest incident and took the issue very seriously.
The prankster posted some of the email exchanges on Twitter, where he describes himself as a "lazy anarchist", and said he was doing it for fun. On Tuesday he promised not to target the White House again, but said "you need to tighten up IT policy".
Here are three of the most memorable parts of the hoax:

Homeland Security Adviser Tom Bossert was apparently tricked into believing Mr Kushner had invited him to a party and gave out his personal email address unsolicited.
"Tom, we are arranging a bit of a soirée towards the end of August," the fake Mr Kushner wrote in emails shared with CNN. "It would be great if you could make it, I promise food of at least comparible [sic] quality to that which we ate in Iraq. Should be a great evening."
Mr Bossert replied: "Thanks, Jared. With a promise like that, I can't refuse. Also, if you ever need it, my personal email is [redacted]."
A day after Mr Priebus was removed as White House chief of staff, the hacker emailed then-White House media chief Mr Scaramucci pretending to be his adversary.
The fake Mr Priebus accused Mr Scaramucci of being "breathtakingly hypocritical" and acting in a way not "even remotely classy".
Mr Scaramucci, appointed communications director a week earlier, had accused Mr Priebus - a Republican Party stalwart - of leaking to the press. He also phoned a reporter to unleash a profanity-filled rant against Mr Priebus, whom he called a "paranoid schizophrenic".
Tricked by the fake emails on Saturday, the real Mr Scaramucci said: "You know what you did. We all do. Even today. But rest assured we were prepared. A Man would apologize."
When the pretend Mr Priebus wrote back defending his work, Mr Scaramucci responded: "Read Shakespeare. Particularly Othello."
Eric Trump, too, was briefly hoodwinked by the prankster emailing as his older brother, Donald Trump Jr, about a long-range hunting rifle.
But Donald Jr soon realised it was a scam and replied: "I have sent this to law enforcement who will handle from here."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40788080
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 09:51 am
AMEN!

Quote:
From Capitol Hill to the White House, the GOP seems perpetually in fear. When Republicans see their shadows, they leap like terrified Cheshire cats into the chandeliers. They need the courage, rather than the cowardice, of their convictions.


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449985/republican-health-care-disaster-fear-try-keeping-promises-instead
layman
 
  -2  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 09:58 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Winston Churchill wrote:
“Courage is the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees all others.”
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 10:55 am
Another twist to the Rich death conspiracy theory. A lawsuit from Wheeler claims Trump involvement. (just part of the piece, the rest at the source)

Quote:
Several conspiracy stories circulated after Rich's death that sought to draw a link to Rich's work at the DNC and the email controversy that dominated the 2016 presidential campaign, including that Rich intended to deliver incriminating emails about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to Wikileaks.

No evidence has ever surfaced to back up that theory, or to suggest Rich had any inside knowledge of the hacking of the DNC emails. The intelligence community later concluded that Russia had hacked the DNC in order to effect the election.

Rich's family was reportedly unhappy with Wheeler's statements to the media that suggested a connection between Rich and Wikileaks.

"The family has relayed their deep disappointment with Rod Wheeler's conduct over the last 48 hours, and is exploring legal avenues to the family," a spokesperson for Seth Rich's family told Fox 5.

Wheeler's lawsuit names Fox on-air guest Ed Butowsky and reporter Malia Zimmerman, saying they "fabricated two quotations and attributed them to Mr. Wheeler."

Butowsky, a wealth manager and Trump supporter, periodically appears on the network as a guest to provide financial analysis. Zimmerman is a Fox News investigative reporter.

The lawsuit cites a text message from Butowsky to Wheeler that states the president "wants the article out immediately."

"Not to add any more pressure but the president just read the article. He wants the article out immediately. It's now all up to you. But don't feel the pressure," the text of the message in the lawsuit reads.

The lawsuit argues that Trump wanted the story because it established that Seth Rich provided WikiLeaks with the DNC emails, which would shift the blame from Russia.

"[Wheeler] was subsequently forced to correct the false record, and, as a result, lost all credibility in the eyes of the public," the lawsuit states.

Wheeler, a Fox News contributor, seeks damages for mental anguish and emotional distress and lost earnings at his private investigation firm.


The Hill
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 11:23 am
@farmerman,
Dust bunnies? No evidence of that. But cosmologists do suspect there are invisible intergalactic dogs spread throughout the entire universe detectable only through their influence on other bodies (ie teeth marks and slime on asteroids and planets). This is the theory of bark matter.
revelette1
 
  3  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 11:24 am
Quote:
Top 6 Falsehoods Embraced by new WH Chief of Staff John Kelly
by Juan Cole

John Kelly will get a lot of good will from having fired the foul-mouthed Anthony Scaramucci. But should he? At least Scaramucci had been gunning for Steve Bannon, the scary far, far right wing white nationalist who serves as White House strategist. You have a sense that while Kelly is just very, very conservative, there are lots of things about Bannon he is comfortable with. That isn’t a comforting thought.

1. Kelly thinks we are under siege:

“We are under attack from failed states, cyber-terrorists, vicious smugglers, and sadistic radicals. And we are under attack every single day. The threats are relentless.”

As Michael Cohen wrote in response at the Boston Globe, “Cyber-terrorists have never killed an American citizen, no failed state threatens America and more Americans are killed by lightning strikes than sadistic radicals.”

2. Kelly said that construction on Trump’s border wall would begin by the end of this summer. It won’t.

3. Nor is the wall needed or wanted by a majority of Americans. Kelly is almost delusional about US immigration enforcement: “Nothing’s been done in the past eight years to to enforce the border rules and regulations, not to mention many of the immigration laws inside of the United States…”

Fact: The Obama administration deported at least as many people as the Bush administration had, if you use the same definition for deportations in both administrations. By sheer reported numbers, Obama deported some 2.5 million people during his 8 years while Bush deported 2 million. They probably actually deported about the same number. Kelly’s bizarre notion that the laws were not implemented since 2009 is flat wrong.

4. Kelly wanted to prioritize deportation of undocumented people who use marijuana on the circa 1910 grounds that it is a “gateway drug.” It is not, or Colorado would be nothing but heroin addicts. Legalization of marijuana tracks with lower crime rates.

5. Kelly said of reports that Jared Kushner had met with the Russians during the campaign, before these reports were confirmed, that “any channel of communication” with Russia “is a good thing.” .

6. Not to mention Kelly’s bizarre performance during Trump’s first attempt at a Muslim ban, when he gladly acted without any regard to the US constitution and claimed to have authored the policy (Bannon and Miller sprang it on him). The most dangerous thing of all is that Kelly is a good soldier and will do as he is told by Trump.



IC
ossobucotemp
 
  3  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 11:54 am
@revelette1,
That list is useful and scary.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  6  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 02:16 pm
I didn't post anything on the WP story re Trump composing or helping to compose the Don Jr statement (with its falsehoods and omissions) because that reporting could have been wrong. But today, Sanders admitted that this is what happened (though minimizing T's role and excusing it, of course). Earlier, Jay Sekulow had flat out denied T's involvement but Sekulow has the same relationship to truth and integrity that Conway has.
0 Replies
 
lmur
 
  7  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 03:53 pm
As seen on twitter:

When Trump promised every American a job, nobody knew he meant just one job and that everyone would get a turn.

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  6  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 05:18 pm
Quote:
A top Environmental Protection Agency official resigned Tuesday in protest of the direction the EPA has taken under President Trump.

Elizabeth "Betsy" Southerland ended her 30-year run at the agency with a scathing exit letter in which she claimed that “the environmental field is suffering from the temporary triumph of myth over truth.” She last worked as the director of science and technology in the Office of Water.

“The truth is there is NO war on coal, there is NO economic crisis caused by environmental protection, and climate change IS caused by man’s activities,” Southerland wrote, directly rejecting many of Trump’s claims.

Southerland said that since EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt took over the agency, dozens of regulations designed to protect the environment had been repealed, and Trump’s proposed budget cuts to the agency would devastate its ability to enforce existing protections and create new ones.
The Hill
Make America Toxic Again.
blatham
 
  4  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 05:55 pm
I can't imagine why a presidential historian might be noting this particular fact
Quote:
Michael Beschloss‏Verified account @BeschlossDC 59m59 minutes ago
White House State Dining Room's fireplace is inscribed with John Adams's wish--“May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof”:
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  6  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 06:17 pm
Quote:
Bill Kristol‏Verified account @BillKristol 13h13 hours ago
We're used to spin, exaggeration, muddying waters, misdirection. But the flat-out lying by Trump & on his behalf takes some getting used to.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  -2  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 06:31 pm
@blatham,
The rumor is she took an ongoing mass early retirement offer to avoid being fired by the new EPA Administrator. Her office championed the arbitrary extension of the "Waters of the United States" term on the Clean Water Act - a term that has always meant the navigable rivers and streams of the country, to include water storage ponds in farms and ranches, and even temporary puddles resulting from regrading at construction sites. The result being effective ownership of the property by an EPA, bent on extending its rule and power. My company just finished most of the initial work on such a construction puddle in an area just south of the SF Bay Bridge on the Oakland side. This was a construction area used for staging materials during the demolition of the old Bay Bridge over the past few years, and the puddle resulted from extensive earth moving and regrading there . The initial plan was for a $25,000 job filling it in from nearby berms. So far under inept EPA rule it has cost several millions and the end is not yet in sight. I know of no beneficial effect to the environment that will result - it's merely a bureaucratic power grab.

Blatham, It helps to know what you are writing about.

My reaction is good riddance
Below viewing threshold (view)
farmerman
 
  5  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 06:42 pm
@georgeob1,
Ive taken on several such weird determinations of the 404. Being able to show the gradual rise from an area below target area for such inclusion is a way we were successful. We showed that the increase in area and volume was counter to the "waters of the state" concept.

It hard to argue evidence clearly developed. You have hydrologists no?

Did you go running in all lawyered up? Sometime that's not a great strategy, often lawyers don't raise fear, instead they just deepen resolve.

farmerman
 
  3  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 06:46 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
This is the theory of bark matter


arghh get sirius
blatham
 
  5  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 07:30 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
The rumor is...
I think we can set that aside. Or we could stand it up beside the rumor that Trump, in Russia, had a thing for girls' peepee.
Quote:
Her office championed the arbitrary extension of the "Waters of the United States" term on the Clean Water Act - a term that has always meant the navigable rivers and streams of the country, to include water storage ponds in farms and ranches, and even temporary puddles resulting from regrading at construction sites.
I won't bother digging down to find if your description here matches the facts. But obviously, storage ponds of many sorts can have, and have had, seriously harmful effects on downstream water systems or nearby wells when those ponds' integrity has been breached or where leaks have occurred. Concern for such ponds is entirely rational.
Quote:
The result being effective ownership of the property by an EPA
That's a notion which seems to match a certain aspect of your ideology but it is incoherent. When the police cordon off a city block because some guy is running around shooting people, are the police guilty of taking effective ownership of that city block? When a community or city is forced by civic authorities to evacuate (as in Alberta last year and BC this year) because of an approaching wildfire, is that such an instance of taking ownership? When an electrical inspector stops construction on a house or building because of fire-code violations, is that taking ownership? All are examples of a government entity of some sort exerting temporary control of an area for very sound reasons.
Quote:
construction puddle
I recall you using that phrase previously. Do you by any chance have a photo of this "puddle"? Were children running through it and splashing happily as children do after a rainfall? I'd imagine that this "puddle" posed some risks of some sort to the bay below. Are you asserting there were no risks? That the EPA moved for no rational reason at all but did it merely because they could? Because the individuals involved just desire power?
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  5  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 07:30 pm
Quote:
Boy Scouts 'unaware' of call Trump said he received praising speech

President Donald Trump told the Wall Street Journal that after his controversial speech at the Boy Scouts National Jamboree in West Virginia, the head of the Boy Scouts called him and told him it was the greatest speech that was ever made to them. But the organization told TIME they are unaware of any call from national leadership placed to the White House.

“The Chief Scout Executive’s message to the Scouting community speaks for itself,” the organization said, referring to a July 27 statement from Michael Surbaugh, the Chief Scout Executive for the Boy Scouts of America, who apologized to anyone in the scouting community who could have been offended or alarmed by the political rhetoric in the speech.


TIME
blatham
 
  4  
Tue 1 Aug, 2017 07:31 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
get sirius
You got a laugh out of me with that, you bastard.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 04:34:28