@hightor,
hightor wrote:To the hypothetical Martian it might seem that America-Firsters, who ordinarily have no use for the UN are somewhat disingenuous — happy to rely on the "toothless old scold" when it comes to the NPT, and quite willing to give it the finger when the international consensus fails to support the US position.
What does this hypothetical Martian think that the UN has to do with the NPT?
At any rate, the hypothetical Martian might want to note the difference between the Security Council and the General Assembly.
The General Assembly is a nest of anti-Semites, has no legal authority, and is rightfully treated with contempt.
The US treats the Security Council with respect.
hightor wrote:Nuclear war might be the
least of that continent's worries. America-Firsters are quick to defund International Planned Parenthood programs and denounce climate concerns as "bad for business". It's difficult to see how another few billion people in sub-Sahara Africa are going to sustain themselves — or, more importantly for the America-Firsters, buy the garbage we're intent on selling them.
A large nuclear war in Africa will kill people billions of people OUTSIDE of Africa. Fallout doesn't stay in one place. And the entire ozone layer will be toast for a century. And nuclear winter will starve people everywhere.
I'm unsure why the hypothetical Martian is bringing up other African problems. Africa may well have other problems, but that doesn't change the fact that a large nuclear war would be devastating and humanity prefers to prevent it.
hightor wrote:A hypothetical Martian might understand that but an actual North Korean, which sees "certain more powerful nations" as a threat to the regime, might not.
The North Koreans know very well that they are pursuing nuclear weapons in furtherance of their goal of an aggressive war against South Korea.
Quote:Ultimately, then, the only approach that might work is one that has not yet been tried: a joint effort by the US and China. As an eventual outcome, both sides’ interests would be met by a unified, denuclearized, neutral Korea. While this end state is not hard to define, the process of getting there would be tortuous and require a degree of mutual trust between Washington and Beijing that does not now exist. Small, confidence-building steps would be needed over a long period.
I don't see North Korea agreeing to being unified with the south under any circumstances other than their conquest of the south.
The way to achieve a nuclear-free Korean peninsula is to base several hundred American tactical nukes in South Korea and only withdraw them when North Korea agrees to give up their nukes.