@snood,
snood wrote:If any of the putrid vermin occupying the White House gets brought to justice, I'll take consolation in that.
Justice would involve not harming an innocent president and instead outlawing the party who is abusing the law to harm him.
snood wrote:But I know there won't be any satisfaction in the comeuppance of the apologists, because they will just go on denying and obfuscating.
It is perfectly reasonable to deny the Left's untrue accusations.
Pointing out facts that you find inconvenient is hardly obfuscation.
snood wrote:If absolute incontrovertible proof of collusion with a hostile government to subvert our system or hard proof of obstruction of justice are uncovered, they'll just say it's lies of the left and a desperate attempt at a coup.
None of us will refer to incontrovertible proof as a lie. That's the sort of thing a liberal would do.
It is reasonable to call it a coup when a party tries to abuse the law to harm our president.
Given the way the liberals actually wanted the Soviets to destroy the US during the Cold War, were just recently sneering at Mitt Romney for saying Russia was a threat, didn't offer much in the way of condemnation for the recent invasions of Ukraine and Georgia, and just sabotaged all the investigations that could have led to protections of future American elections, it is pretty disgusting to hear them pretend to be all concerned about a supposed Russian threat.
Receiving damaging information about opposing candidates hardly subverts our system.
If hard proof of obstruction of justice were to emerge (unlikely, since nothing that has been alleged so far could possibly count as obstruction), the response would be to point out that the Democrats were just fine with obstruction of justice when Bill Clinton was the one committing it.
snood wrote:If there are indictments of Manafort or Flynn or Kushner or Jr., they'll just say "The Fake News won a small victory".
No. If Flynn or Manafort are indicted for failing to register as a foreign agent, that will be an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. The solution will be to pardon them.
If Kushner or Jr are indicted, the charges will obviously be untrue. The solution will again be pardons.
Best actually to just pardon everyone right now so we can bring the witch hunt to an end.
snood wrote:I am convinced they are immune to any objective proof of wrongdoing by this disgrace of an administration.
Well, your biggest problem is that you are pretending that perfectly legitimate activities are wrongdoing.
No matter how many times you breathlessly denounce Trump for having done nothing wrong, none of us are going to care.
But you do have a point. If you did manage to establish any sort of Trump wrongdoing, our very next question to you would be "Why should anyone care after you let Bill Clinton commit all those felonies?"
snood wrote:That's why I don't argue too hard against their bullshit.
Facts are not BS, no matter how inconvenient you find those facts.
The reason why you don't try to argue against facts is, facts are pretty hard to argue against. Deep down some part of you realizes how foolish you look when you try to deny reality
