@hightor,
hightor wrote:
But Fuller's piece is not "corrosive" or "hateful".
We obviously disagree.
There is no way in hell that Fuller didn't know the sort of reaction his piece would generate among those on the right and that reaction rather than an interesting little thought experiment was his intent. That falls within the general heading of "corrosive and hateful". I don't buy for a minute the notion that the article was a clever and subtle parody of the right's reaction to politicians with whom they disagree. I also don't think he's clever enough to have left clues for it being a parody, so he could make that claim at a later date, but even that's more likely than it having always been intended as a parody of the right.
Quote:As I said, he's hardly a mainstream writer who shapes popular opinion.
So what? That the intended effect wasn't more widespread because neither he nor the Huffington Post are anything close to being household names doesn't alter the intent or the nature of what he wrote. I certainly wasn't arguing that the guy should be thrown in prison or prohibited from ever posting on-line again, and neither was layman.
The corrosive and hateful rhetoric that is deepening the divide in this country doesn't have to incite violence to be deserving of condemnation. This was part of what Bruni had to say. His article wasn't limited to rhetoric he felt would lead to violence and all of the examples he used weren't obviously
bigger deals than Fuller's article. You seem to think that you are somehow the arbiter of what corrosive rhetoric is a
big enough deal to care about and so you dismissed layman's comments because he happened to think Fuller's article in some way was, and you obviously don't. I guess you must have agreed with all of Bruni's examples and/or considered all of those folks
mainstream shapers of opinion because you didn't react derisively to his article in the way you did layman's comments or dismissively as you did mine. Don't get me wrong, I'm not offended or hurt by your derision or dismissal, I'm just pointing out your inconsistency.