192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
snood
 
  8  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 01:59 am
About my mention of Ted Nugent as an example that even the most rabid partisan can seek conciliation - I take it back. He was just on Fox and Friends making the point that when he screamed an invitation for Barack Obama to suck on his machine gun, it was only a metaphor - certainly not intended to suggest violence. His new moderation epiphany is about as genuine as if Jack the Ripper started admonishing the world to stop killing prostitutes.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
layman
 
  -4  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 02:31 am
@layman,
Quote:
CNN’s Jim Acosta BUSTED For Fake News About Trump’s Visit to See Scalise

CNN’s Jim Acosta was caught peddling fake news in wake of the shooting on the Republican Congressional baseball team. CNN appears to be rather committed to reporting fake news.

Acosta tweeted that President Trump didn’t actually see Steve Scalise when he and Melania visited the hospital on the night of the shooting. Acosta even attributed this news to a White House official as you can see in a screenshot of his tweet below.

But, that was simply not true. [Trump did see him.] When he was caught promoting fake news, Acosta deleted the tweet and then tried to cover for it. In another tweet he said he learned this from a White House pool report.

But, wait. He didn’t mention a pool report in his first tweet. He said he learned it from a White House official, even putting the words in quotation marks to signify that it was given directly to him. Anyway you slice it, Acosta was busted promoting fake news. Rather than apologize, he just doubled down with a stupid excuse.


http://www.tmn.today/2017/06/jim-acosta-cnn-fake-news-busted-trump-visit-see-scalise/
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 05:03 am
Quote:
Van strikes crowd near London mosques in apparent terror attack
Witnesses said the van's driver was heard shouting he wanted to kill Muslims after speeding off the road and swerving into a crowd of people who had just finished night time prayers for the holy month of Ramadan.
WP
blatham
 
  4  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 05:06 am
Quote:
Jay Sekulow had a hectic day Sunday, bouncing from one news show to another to beat back reports that President Trump was under investigation for obstruction of justice.

In media blitz through three networks, Sekulow, a new member of Trump’s legal team, repeatedly insisted that there was no such probe — an assertion at odds with stories published last week in The Washington Post and elsewhere — only to concede later that he could not know for sure. At one point he flatly contradicted himself on Fox News Sunday, in a stumble that host Chris Wallace, a seasoned TV interrogator, seized upon for maximum effect.
WP

Edit: There's some discussion/commentary in the piece on the oddness of the choice made to bring Sekulow on board. Likely, our right wing contingent will be much more familiar with him than most other folks because right wing media has been Sekulow's home for decades, mainly involved as a rep of the religious right. So his background/expertise seems quite inappropriate, legally.

But it makes sense, undoubtedly, in Trump's mind because Trump is playing to his base and trying to keep them in line. A right wing media celebrity is what he wants.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 05:36 am
@blatham,
Ed has started a thread on this.

https://able2know.org/topic/393573-1
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 05:37 am
EJ Dionne gets this exactly right
Quote:
Let it be said that for one lovely moment, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi responded exactly as those in authority should to a shocking assault on human lives and our political system. After last Wednesday’s shooting on a baseball field, both spoke in a spirit of thoughtful solidarity and genuinely mutual concern. Kudos to them.

Unfortunately, so much else that has been said over the past few days is — I will use a family-oriented term — balderdash. We are not, alas, about to enter some new age of civility because of this terrible episode. And our divisions are not just a matter of our failing to speak nicely of and to each other, even though politeness is an underrated virtue these days.

The harsh feelings in our politics arise from a long process — the steady destruction of the norms of partisan competition that began more than a quarter-century ago. Well before President Trump took political invective to a new level, Newt Gingrich was pushing his side to extreme forms of aggressiveness.

Journalist John M. Barry cited an emblematic 1978 speech Gingrich gave to a group of College Republicans in which he warned them off “Boy Scout words, which would be great around the campfire, but are lousy in politics.”

“You’re fighting a war,” the future House speaker said. “It is a war for power. . . . Don’t try to educate them. That is not your job. . . . What’s the primary purpose of a political leader? . . . To build a majority.”
.
WP

One of the very best sources on Gingrich over the years has been Joan Didion writing in the New York Review of Books (a number of these pieces were subsequently published in her book "Political Fictions" which really is a book many of you would find both bright and delightful). I'll link one NYRB essay here The Teachings of Speaker Gingrich For about two decades, I've had little doubt that Gingrich is a sociopath.

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 05:38 am
@izzythepush,
Thanks Izzy.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 07:03 am
I haven't had time to go through this yet but Jon Chait has a very interesting-looking piece up right now. Here's the first bit as teaser...
Quote:
The Democracy Fund Voter Study Group has a new survey of the electorate that explodes many of the myths that we believe about American politics. Lee Drutman has a fascinating report delving into the data. I want to highlight a few of the most interesting conclusions in the survey.

1. The Democratic Party is not really divided on economics.
You think the Bernie Sanders movement was about socialism? Not really. Sanders voters have the same beliefs about economic equality and government intervention as Hillary Clinton supporters. On the importance of Social Security and Medicare, Sanders voters actually have more conservative views:
NYMag
I'm starting a renovation job today so not sure when I'll get to this but I'm sure others will get a chance to dig in.
MontereyJack
 
  7  
Mon 19 Jun, 2017 07:50 am
@gungasnake,
I notice Breitbart and the right wing media's deafening silence , when discussing violent threats, about the multiple occasions when 10,000 people at Trump rallies roared out "String her up" about Hillary, while Trump just stood by smirking. Right wing lynching squads. Just a little two faced furious indignation, right-wing zealots, doncha think?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.49 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 04:08:15