192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
snood
 
  3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:16 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

We knew Trump was a maniac. We've always known that. What's so horribly scary and depressing here is that all those others are playing along rather than walking out and resigning en masse.

At the very least I'd hope someone had the guts to tell him, even in private, when he's doing stupid ****. But from all reports, no one does. Not his supposedly more level headed daughter, not his hard-as-nails retired generals, nobody.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:17 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Yes and he's right.

The Founders, weren't perfect.

They imagined a time when a president might be a tyrant without clear and convincing evidence of violating any law and they wanted Congressional patriots to be able to rid our government of such a tyrant.

As much as they understood human nature and the possible venality of politicians, I don't think they imagined a Congress taking advantage of the wiggle room they've been provided to stage a coup for partisan reasons alone.

I'm not saying this is what Democrats have planned. First of all they don't have the votes to do so, and even if they did, I have confidence (perhaps misplaced) that there enough serious patriots among them (particularly in the Senate) to not attempt such a coup if there is no real evidence or "High Crimes & Misdemeanors"

If I'm wrong they will destroy the Union.

There are no such patriots in the Democratic Party.

But I don't think the nation will be destroyed. All we have to do is outlaw the Democratic Party.

Obviously such a law would be challenged in court. But I think if we defend the law based on the need to protect the nation from the Democrats' abuses, the law will ultimately pass muster before the Supreme Court.
snood
 
  3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:18 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
Sessions is already a known liar (I refer to his confirmation hearing and Russia info), so I don't see its going to make much of a matter where he 'testifies' with this batch of lies.
Understood. But he does now, with this decision, put himself in the spotlight and with that comes very close attention and legal jeopardy. He will certainly be as well prepared for this as they can craft the thing but there are serious risks here.

I think he's going to "not recollect" a bunch of things and claim executive privilege about a bunch of other things.
Blickers
 
  5  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:18 pm
@oralloy,
Quote oralloy:
Quote:
the fact that Trump has not done anything wrong

Many would disagree that that is a fact.
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:20 pm
Quote:
Caitlin Owens reports that Senate Republicans are going to keep their health care bill secret, because god forbid the public should find out what’s in it:
Quote:
Senate Republicans are working to finish their draft health care bill, but have no plans to publicly release it, according to two senior Senate GOP aides.

“We aren’t stupid,” said one of the aides. One issue is that Senate Republicans plan to keep talking about it after the draft is done: “We are still in discussions about what will be in the final product so it is premature to release any draft absent further member conversations and consensus.”


So they’re doing an end run around the normal committee process, writing it in secret, hoping to send it to the Congressional Budget Office for a score before anyone gets to see it, then they’ll take a quick vote before opposition gets too loud. For a bill to remake one-sixth of the American economy and determine the course of everyone’s health care.

The arrogance of believing they can get away with that is just stunning, particularly when you recall how much they complained that the Affordable Care Act was “rammed through” when it was debated for an entire year, including dozens of hearings and markups and one of the longest floor debates in history.
Paul Waldman
The Owens/Axios piece is HERE
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  6  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:20 pm
@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:

Quote oralloy:
Quote:
the fact that Trump has not done anything wrong

Many would disagree that that is a fact.

It's an alternative fact.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:24 pm
@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:
Officials in Washington State sued and got Trump's travel ban shot down because it violated Constitutional rights. Why shouldn't these state officials have the right to sue on Constitutional grounds also?

Trump's ban has been shot down in the lower courts because it has come before extremist judges.

We'll see how the Supreme Court rules, but I'll be surprised if they decide to ignore reality the way the lower courts have done.

Generally you need standing before you are able to sue. These officials do have the right to bring a case to the courts, but if they don't have a good argument as to why they have standing, their case will probably end up thrown out of court.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:26 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
I've tried to explain the purely political nature of the impeachment process to oralloy several times over the last few days, to no avail.

Impeachment is supposed to be for officials who have done something wrong. It isn't supposed to be for the Democrats to attack people who disagree with them.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:28 pm
@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:
Many would disagree that that is a fact.

When Democrats disagree with reality, that does not change reality.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:29 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:
It's an alternative fact.

Your dislike of reality does not make facts become alternative facts.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:30 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Like Whitewater?

Whitewater was self defense. The Democrats were abusing the law to harm people who disagreed with them, and the Republicans needed to give them a dose of their own medicine in order to get them to back off.

You can expect the next Democratic president to be lynched this way too, since the Democrats have clearly forgotten their lessons from the Clinton era. (Unless the Democratic Party is abolished outright in order to preserve the republic.)


hightor wrote:
I think it's way too early to be planning the impeachment of Mr. Trump. If something is discovered during the investigation which really implicates the president in truly questionable activities, enough to cause moderate Republicans to peel off, then you'll see the forces for impeachment catalyze.

Let's say that conflicts of interest are discovered, along with questionable dealings with Russia, and exposure of an extensive record of lying. I think the old man would resign and just work to pump up the tattered remains of his "movement" rather than face a trial.

Having contacts with Russia is not a crime.

If one country interfering in another's election was against the law, we need to pack Bill Clinton and Barack Obama off to an Israeli prison cell for all their efforts to get Netanyahu voted out of power.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:32 pm
@snood,
Quote:
It's an alternative fact.

Which can be more efficiently termed a "fuct" or "alt-fuct"
nimh
 
  5  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:35 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

I agree our attention should be on the Russian/Trump investigation but, in the meantime, the republicans have been quietly working on a disastrous health care bill.

Relevant observation:

Quote:
People care way, way, way more about health care than they do about Russia (or anything else, for that matter)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DAns18MXkAAJvYn.jpg


Also:

Quote:
[D]espite the constant swirl of Trump-related Russia controversies, the early evidence from the campaign trail is that the president’s scandals are far from the Republican Party’s most serious political vulnerability. Half a dozen political scientists and political organizers on the ground said in interviews that they see one issue galvanizing voters more than any other — health care. [..]

The stakes of the AHCA are immediate and obvious. Though a revised bill hasn’t received its final estimates, the AHCA would cost an estimated 24 million people their health insurance, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It creates a waiver that would allow states to opt out of key Obamacare rules, like the one banning insurers from charging those with preexisting conditions more. There is a seemingly endless list of provisions that are vulnerable to attack — massive tax cuts for the wealthy, smaller financial benefits for the poor and elderly, weaker protections for children and parents.

“On Comey and Russia, voters see there’s a lot of smoke and maybe even some fire; they’re yet to see that the fire might burn them,” said Jesse Ferguson, a former Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee official, in an interview. “Whereas on health care, the country knows that repeal will burn them.” [..]

“Health care attracts more interest and passion and anxiety than any of the other ‘Trump scandals’ — people aren’t keeping up with the FBI director or the Russians or these other things that Washington is obsessed with,” Hopkins said. “Everyone cares about health care and understand how it affects their lives.”


Or, as Chris Arnade put it:

Quote:
Small note to Democrats in DC: If you want to win, talk less about Russia, more about healthcare.

Healthcare is visceral, Russia is not.

Keep pushing Russia stuff, but primarily behind the scenes where it can play out naturally without need for aggressive grandstanding

Keep pushing health care, and the GOP's naked/ugly/distorted desire to further disenfranchise working class & poorer americans.

Affording the basics of a good life -- health care, education, transportation, home -- is what many Americans are dealing & obsessed with

Right now Trump isn't (& IMO won't) deliver the jobs he promised. In addition the GOPs policies will make those basics far more expensive

Trump won because there was a sense in large parts of country (IMO justified) that DC had failed to deliver the hope/change it promised.

For many Americans their lives still felt like running up on a down escalator. Job losses, stagnant incomes, rising health care. etc

Trump/GOPs policies are making that worse. Keep reminding voters that you really get their frustrations & you will do better this time.

Build economic credibility. Yelling about Russia, while maybe justified, will only push people into tribal camps --A knee jerk defense.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  -2  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:35 pm
Trump demands Loyalty and he loves to get revenge of those who don't give it.

Those are not my words but Trumps words.

0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:36 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Im waay more interested in his entire ignoring of the "Pinkney Clause" of the US Constitution , (which, s I understand, is only applicable to the Executive and the Judicial branches).
I need a Constitutional lawyer to explain that one.

The Pinkney Clause ( re:"Emoluments") will force Trump to reveal his tax records . There was a big deal in this mornings Balto Sun.

Trump still has his right to privacy. If he wishes his tax records to remain secret, that is his right.
farmerman
 
  4  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:37 pm
@oralloy,
not if a case goes forward. Ever hear of subpoena?
oralloy
 
  -4  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:40 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
snood wrote:
It's an alternative fact.

Which can be more efficiently termed a "fuct" or "alt-fuct"

The standard liberal reaction to facts is ridicule.

But facts remain true no matter how dishonorable the Left is.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  4  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:40 pm
@layman,
Not sure what you mean there? I read the figures I gave directly from the chart.

http://i.imgur.com/tVal4Gw.png

http://i.imgur.com/h4ljEZV.png
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:42 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
not if a case goes forward. Ever hear of subpoena?

The courts will respect his privacy. If he has to provide private records for a court case, those records will remain sealed from the public. Anyone who leaks them will end up in prison.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  3  
Mon 12 Jun, 2017 06:42 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:

Mark Twain wrote:
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.


Evergreen post.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.05 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 12:43:23