NYTimes editorial this morning
Quote:In appointing David Friedman as the next ambassador to Israel, Donald Trump voiced a desire to “strive for peace in the Middle East.” Unfortunately, his chosen representative would be far more likely to provoke conflict in Israel and the occupied territories, heighten regional tensions and undermine American leadership.
yup
Everything I've read about this guy suggests that looks to be true. So what the hell is going on? Why would Trump's crowd prefer such an extreme confrontational choice to send to Israel?
1. they want to further destabilize the region
2. they are so extreme in anti-Muslim sentiment they actually desire a larger conflict with that religious group
3. they aren't thinking that far ahead about much of anything and just following the advices of ultra-extremists in or influencing their transition team decisions
4. they are picking extremists here and elsewhere - extremists they know will cause loud protests - simply as a demonstration of power (the alpha bully thing)