@blatham,
blatham wrote:
"Propaganda" doesn't mean what you think it means. I've written perhaps a half dozen posts on Sinclair. Please isolate anything I wrote or cited in them which was not factual or which was a fallacious claim unwarranted by the factual material.
I suspect we both know and understand the definition of the word, and we have discussed this point previously.
I have no desire to look up your posts on Sinclair, or to complete your presumptuous "assignment". All of these posts were about the activities of the Sinclair Broadcast company in buying other radio stations and providing them selected materials for broadcast .
These are, of course, the normal actions of any growing media company of all types including radio, TV, cable and print. You put it all in the context of a supposed conservative conspiracy that is unique to that zone in the political spectrum, and did so without any description or acknowledgment of comparable media organizations with different perspectives. It was propaganda, and rather superficial and transparent stuff to boot.
I would have a hard time believing that even you would seriously count that biased stuff as objective scholarship.