McGentrix wrote:C.I. Gunga said "if", I have provided a source that agrees with him and you say that source just isn't good enough... tsk, tsk... I think your absence has had a debillitating effect on you.
Another source
Yet another
Is this one acceptable?
I know that none of these links point to commondreams or the DU, but you'll just have to accept these as evidence that WMD's may have been moved to Syria.
McGentrix, you've got to stop posting propaganda sites, it shows where your ignorance comes from. How many links to DU have been seen on this website? Yet, you, and other blind people CONTINUE to post topics from propaganda sites such as worldnet, newsmax, washington times, Insight, csn etc. It's outright lunacy to believe this crap. These are also year old articles!!!
Let me tell you what you will find in almost EVERY single article. They will have obtained some "exclusive" documents form some UN-NAMED government official who claims to have "irrefutable evidence" about some threat or proof, and it's all supposedly "irrefutable". You will find no pictures, scans or legal documents, and instead they will tell you what "they saw", or "they heard". This will never hit mainstream press not because of the liberal media, but because it DOESN'T EXIST!!! It's PROPAGANDA with a capitol P, you have to see this if you EVER want to look at ANYTHING objectively!!! It's the same reason why people don't post from DU, democrats know it's propaganda as well, so they'll read it and do the follow up investigation on their own!!! This is how you become an informed voter, instead of a piece of the ignorant American public which believes what they want to.
On the 1 in 100 chance that they actually DO have a photograph, they will use it as evidence, which will refutable by any logical thinker!!! They'll show a truck and say something like "These photographs were taken from Israeli spy satellites, and they show the WMD's being transported over the border of Iraq to Syria" when all you see is a TRUCK!!! You will not find photographs which "prove" anything (Kerry's pen sound familiar).
Do me a favor and actually READ some of the articles and LOOK for what I just pointed out to you, I guarantee you will see it in almost EVERY single article on the aforementioned sites.
You see, these sites are meant to distort the facts. They are meant to completely ignore the truth, they are propaganda sites, and Fox News falls into the same category. So does DU for the other side, Michael Moore follows suit, albeit not as bad as the others. I have my own personal feelings on Moore and he adds spin when the spin isn't needed, so he in turn ends up hurting his cause rather then helping it.
As for the "pictures" yes, I remember the "pictures" which sites such as the Washington Times and Newsmax supposedly had, unfortunately for you it was all BS. There is NO evidence of WMD being transported as reported by the propaganda machines. All they all refer to an "un-named government official" or "a defector". Well, the defector was a Chalibi stooge, probably a relative. I could extrapolate on the whole Chalibi farce if you want me to, but it will only make you see more of the same, lying, distortion and spin.
Maybe after you see all the facts, you will still vote for Bush, hell I don't know, he does have a few places where I see people could vote for him, but you have to see ALL the facts!!! Looking at propaganda sites and using them as your sources only calls out your ignorance on the issues.
As for the CSN BS, this is the FOURTH thread in which I am calling them out as producing a fictional article, don't people read the other posts? Or do they hope that by creating a thread with the same topic people will give it more "credibility"?
