I have not said we are arming people, are we aiding the Syrian rebels? (whatever that means?)
This is a question not a statement.
I think we should be helping Putin and Assad secure and rebuild Syria so the refugees can go home and try and "rebuild". They are much better off in derelict buildings in Syria than huddled in masses like vagrants on city streets throughout Europe and the world. So Assad is corrupt and responsible for human rights deaths. Putin hates gays. Well I got news for you all (being a homosexual myself) sometimes gays can be too aggressive at their recruitment tactics. Putin may have been right in smacking them down a bit. Putin will have to deal with the church once they have created a radical sub culture of terror in Russia. Assassin nuns and monks that will eventually oppose his legitimacy to rule. Putin thinks the church is his friend. He has much to learn about what the church has done to rulers in the past.
What do you think the coalition war in Iraq did? Violently killed a million Iraqis including innocent civilians. Our political leaders are responsible for these human rights atrocities too, these deaths make Assad look like mother Teresa.
I am not making any claims I am just wondering why we are not helping Assad rebuild his war torn country. I would rather see Assad run Syria than "rebels". Assad we know, rebels are a complete unknown... How do we know these rebels won't turn Syria right over to ISIS? There is a REALLY good possibility they would. It might be in our better interest to oppose these rebels and try and restore Syria's borders.
Assad also was known for allowing western customs into his country too.
It is said that Saddam violently killed 100 thousand people. Well, America and our worldwide coalition went in and violently killed a million. Million!
I am not making judgments but it is perhaps time to help Syria restore order.
They are much better off with Assad as Iraq was perhaps better off with Saddam (who knows).
I don't care about the "Arab spring", we liberated Iraq from their self proclaimed king and the population voted in the most draconian sects of their religion.
These kings and royals are better for the Middle east than democracy is until they can educate their masses with science over religion.
Secular schools are the only way forward towards peace in the Middle East.
Bush totally blew it when he secured Iraq, he should have demanded a change in the education hierarchy.
When we defeated Japan and Germany we deposed the royals/rulers and demanded they change their societal structure.
Bush just left the country to slip rigth directly back into their old ways.
This was the most a egregious of all errors.
Oh "we must not step on their religious freedom" poppyfuckingcock!
New secular text books should have been written and the religious clerics should have been marginalized to Sunday school only.
Bush let the Iraqi church waltz right back into the state.
The same mistake was done in Libya and Egypt. People brainwashed by religion vote for people like Trump... Consider that.
This why we live in a republic rather than a democracy in the US. The founding fathers knew what mob/rebel rule could lead to.
This is why we have super delegates too.
This is why we have high courts and this is also why the president can declare marshal law. Because we are a republic bound by our secular constitution at all costs, even at the cost of democracy.