0
   

Let's talk about replacing GWBush in 2004.

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 04:53 pm
eoe, anybody was a quick reply, anyone is better - I don't know that that person has reached the apex yet.

Question is, do we find someone with intergrity or do we find a secretive, lying, schemer like - well, never mind

go for integrity - but not a womanizer <sigh>

Clinton, hmm - how about Hillary?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 05:47 pm
Neither Hill nor Bill is going to run, and neither will President Gore. There's an excellent thread elsewhere on Democratic candidates so rather than follow the trail of "who" let's return to "why he needs replacing":

"I think the fact that they didn't include funding for the 9/11 Commission -- didn't warn Gov. Kean that they weren't going to include it, didn't return my phone call -- suggests to me that they see this as a convenient way for allowing the commission to fail. They've never wanted the commission and I feel the White House has always been looking for a way to kill it without having their finger on the murder weapon."
-- Stephen Push, a leader of the 9/11 victims' families
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 09:55 pm
Here's a reason I think he needs replacing tomorrow, or sooner:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,925008,00.html
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:09 pm
Yikes, Tartarin............this really scares me. These people's belief that they are right is so powerful, they will do anything in the name of God and a sense of control. Our civil liberties are in grave danger.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:11 pm
And Paul Krugman says, the mistakes are bad and getting worse, bigger:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/28/opinion/28KRUG.html
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:17 pm
And the promised report on the defense advisors has come out from the Center for Public Integrity:


Advisors of Influence: Nine Members of the Defense Policy Board Have Ties to Defense Contractors

Of the 30 members of the Defense Policy Board, the government-appointed group that advises the Pentagon, at least nine have ties to companies that have won more than $76 billion in defense contracts in 2001 and 2002. Four members are registered lobbyists, one of whom represents two of the three largest defense contractors...
http://www.publicintegrity.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=513&L1=10&L2=10&L3=0&L4=0&L5=0
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:18 pm
expect a congressional investigation with MANY resignations.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:19 pm
True criminals!
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:33 pm
Dys, if that happens, it will truly be a happy day but I doubt it ever comes to that. Streetcorner hustlers from the getgo, it will be swept under the rug or camoflouged by other matters (like military casualties and POW's) and it will be like it never happened. Didn't someone resign already? That's all you're gonna get.
But I sure hope I'm wrong.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:42 pm
eoe, heard on NPR tonight that it wasn't a resignation, Perle just gave up the Chairmanship.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:45 pm
Lola, It's not that our civil liberties are in grave danger; they have already taken away some of it. Arab Americans are already mistreated by this government, and not a peep from most Americans. c.i.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:13 pm
WE'RE BEING JACKED!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:34 pm
That certainly ain't new from this administration eoe!
0 Replies
 
trespassers will
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 02:21 pm
Tartarin wrote:
And the promised report on the defense advisors has come out from the Center for Public Integrity:


Advisors of Influence: Nine Members of the Defense Policy Board Have Ties to Defense Contractors

Of the 30 members of the Defense Policy Board, the government-appointed group that advises the Pentagon, at least nine have ties to companies that have won more than $76 billion in defense contracts in 2001 and 2002. Four members are registered lobbyists, one of whom represents two of the three largest defense contractors...
http://www.publicintegrity.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=513&L1=10&L2=10&L3=0&L4=0&L5=0

Yeah, let's get people who have nothing to do with defense and let them decide policy. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 02:30 pm
You got it right, Tres.
(VERY RIGHT!)
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 03:17 pm
if there ain't a buck in it, it ain't patriotic.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 03:37 pm
The latest polls show that Bush is ahead of any democrat running for the presidency in 2004. So was Bush senior during the middle of Gulf War I. ci
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 03:44 pm
One wonders who they questioned!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 03:52 pm
The patrons of Bush speeches!
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 03:55 pm
Tartarin
I am afraid they questioned the voting public. I continue to be mystified, amazed and question the intelligence of a voting public who voted for an obvious moron 2000. Why is it so strange to think they will again in 04 and possibly in greater numbers? I have heard it said the masses are asses.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 08:30:13