0
   

Let's talk about replacing GWBush in 2004.

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 05:16 pm
Yes, and how do we stop that - it is amazing,

Conservative Dogma:

We're in a boom - the rich get richer
We're in a bust - the rich get richer
We're at peace - the rich get richer
We're at war - the rich get richer
We must sacrifice - the rich get richer

Get the picture!
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 05:25 pm
Love your posts, John Webb!

(Jawohl click click.)
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 05:57 pm
I vote for replacing Bush in '03!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 06:34 pm
If only, bill - if only...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 06:36 pm
Before the war starts? I'm for that! c.i.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 08:45 pm
If we all just keep confusing him, like right now - he can't concentrate you- must take his five naps a day, 7 lately because it is so tiring. Well, keep on keeping on and then it will be all over,

Oh, I wish, I wish, I wish, I wish,...........
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 08:54 pm
commentator on PBS News Hour tonite; "Blair looks the worst for wear of his entire career, George looks like he sleeps well and has no worries" i think there is a clue is this observation.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 10:25 pm
The White House depicts poor George as having cancelled all his appointments and spending Hours and Hours and Hours on the Phone Trying to Persuade... Naw. I can hear the squeak and groan of the Stair Climber all the way out here, the thud-whoosh of the treadmill. Replace him in 2003? We need a remake of that "Dave" movie.
0 Replies
 
trespassers will
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2003 11:16 pm
Quote:
I'll have to work at getting a link, but I believe Ashcroft has been pressuring folks on STATE levels.

It wouldn't surprise me if he were, and I agree it is a bad thing if he is. I'm not happy with his meddling in state's rights. From what I read in this specific instance, the reference seems to be to application of the death penalty in federal cases. (Of course, the expansion of the use of federal cases is a cause for concern in-and-of itself.)
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 02:11 am
Speaking hypothetically, let us assume that the most evil and immoral group of reincarnated Nazis managed to defraud their way into the White House. How would they behave upon attaining office?

Thoughts coming to mind include: finding excuses for invading other nations for their strategic locations and/or mineral wealth for the benefit of themselves and their supporters; introducing policies which direct taxpayers' money into the pockets of their major backers and to Hell with the economy and everyone else; setting-up concentration camps outside U.S. territory and jurisdiction; destroying the United Nations; ensuring press briefings only before 'friendly' audiences; seeking ways of amending the Consitution to their electoral advantage; being seen regularly attending church. To name but a few.

How fortunate we are that such things could never happen here! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 08:29 am
John -- I'm SO-O-O-O glad to welcome you to A2K. Wonderful posts!
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 09:20 am
K ind of you to say so and also thanks to the other contributors who have made me so welcome. Embarrassed

Although I am not sure George, Dick, Donald and Colin would agree? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 09:38 am
I also like your tail.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 11:35 am
John, And Condi, ofcoarse@! c.i.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 06:44 pm
(Some comments from David Rossie:)

George Bush is at his best before a captive or invitation-only audience, where he can display his down-home folksiness, secure in the knowledge that there will be ample applause and no surprise questions -- usually no questions at all.

With the national press corps, even one as cowed as this one, there is always the possibility that some smart-aleck will slip in a question that wasn't anticipated in the briefing.

However, when you have a president who is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier in the first place, syntactically challenged in the second, and inclined to be huffy when things aren't going his way in the third, you have the makings of a public relations disaster.

And that is why G.W. has had but eight live press conferences during the two years he's been in office. During the same period, the garrulous Clinton had 30.

So, Karl Rove's concern, as Bush sallied forth into the lion's den -- populated for the most part by lapdogs -- was understandable, even though extreme steps had been taken to avoid any embarrassing moments. Members of the press corps who would be called upon were selected beforehand. And it was reported that their questions had been submitted in advance. Bush's perusal of written notes before answering some questions supports that assertion.

The most disturbing aspect of that hour-long exercise in obfuscation, however, was Bush's behavior. The NY Times summed it up with a masterful touch that did not step over the line into subjectivity, but still spelled it out for anyone willing to see it. "Mr. Bush," they wrote, sounding sedate..."

Add the letter "d" to the last word in that phrase, and you get a chillingly accurate description of Bush's demeanor throughout that weird hour. The Times' Maureen Dowd suggested Xanax. My own guess was Ritalin or Prozac.

Given the extent of public disapproval -- both here and overseas -- of the administration's determination to invade Iraq, Bush's handlers could not risk a display of petulance of a kind that has marked some of his other press conferences. So instead of a lively give-and-take on a sensitive and complex issue, we got nearly an hour in which nearly every question was followed by a the same vague, answer, or non-answer.

There was one exception, when one of the hand-picked questioners tossed Dubyuh a Nerfball. Was his faith sustaining him? she asked. Indeed it is, Dubyuh replied. He prays constantly, and he and Laura are lifted up by the prayers of others.

The Wall Street Journal's Al Hunt said he watched the press conference along with others at a broadcasters' gathering, in near disbelief. They were stunned at first by Bush's trancelike state and vague responses, and eventually bored by them. Ten minutes into the conference, Hunt said, they turned it off.

Not everyone saw it that way. By Saturday, Bush's handlers had spun a different story. The president, White House chief of staff Andrew Card said, was simply composed and serene, having spent 10 minutes before the press conference alone in meditation. Then he strode to the lectern "presenting himself ...as a leader impervious to doubt."

We may have doubts. The world may have doubts, but not our leader. That's because, again according to his staff, Bush "sees the world as a biblical struggle of good versus evil."

We are supposed to find that reassuring. In which case, let us pray and pray hard.

A very weird hour with the president
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 07:10 pm
In that respect, the Brits have it all over the US where the PM must speak before Parliament and answer questions. Sometimes I wish Tony Blair was our president, and GWBush the Brit's PM. c.i.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2003 08:43 pm
I will say the British execution of the Democratic Process makes for far more entertaining television than does the American version.
Of course, I tend to prefer Britcoms to their American adaptations.



timber
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2003 05:51 am
The Bush Administration say that Iraq must be bombed and invaded because Saddam is an evil dictator who possesses W.M.D.s (which U.N. Inspectors cannot find after months of searching) and must be removed from power immediately for the sake of future world peace.

Applying the Administration's logic, should another nation decide that George poses a similar danger to future world peace, would that justify the bombing and invasion of America?

Or does such logic not apply when the hidden agenda may be profit, at taxpayers' expense, for weapons manufacturers and oil companies? Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2003 11:07 am
JW, please do not be logical - it is not allowed! Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2003 11:17 am
Hear, hear. I second what BillW just said. Hear, hear.... c.i.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/16/2025 at 08:24:55