0
   

Let's talk about replacing GWBush in 2004.

 
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 08:37 am
Lola, it is only the most profound of posteriors, the gleamingest of glutei, the most regal of rumps, the most delictable of derrieres........
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 08:39 am
Laughing
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 08:45 am
And delightfully spankable, as well Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 08:45 am
Re mr destructo....to be fair guys, I myself threw some pretty stinky stink bombs at the fellow

sofia said
Quote:
I thought Democrats supported Mapplethorpe and his art... So, it is OK to take nude photos, and pose for them... unless you are a Republican? The moral code of the Dems seems to be based on whatever furthers their agenda at the time.

Is is bad to pose nude? Should the Dems put a stop to this immoral practice?

"democrats" or folks who spoke up for Mapplethorpe supported free expression in art. It was a stance which positioned itself not 'for' the content, but in opposition to the homophobia and sexual prurience of those who were on the attack against the NEA. You know that.

The irony is that Arnold will be getting support from many of those same people, for partisan reasons, principle flying out the window. I hold nothing against Arnold for posing, nor for being a republican actually. But it looks very much like he's guilty of a pattern of abuse and molestation of women for a long time, and that makes him ineligible for office under my set of values. Plus, a matter of some relevance, his CV is a joke.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 08:47 am
my vote for Most Spankable Thread Participant is....

Italgato
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:04 am
blatham's quote, in part--
"democrats" or folks who spoke up for Mapplethorpe supported free expression in art. It was a stance which positioned itself not 'for' the content, but in opposition to the homophobia and sexual prurience of those who were on the attack against the NEA. You know that.
-------------
Then, why do the Democrats feel Arnold posing for Mapplethorpe is even an issue? You may not, blatham, but plenty do. Very hypocritical, to me.
-------------
It seems Ariana "Who me, pay taxes?" Huffington is scheduled for a news conference, where she plans to trot out one of Arnold's alleged 'victims'. Looking forward to seeing what he's being accused of. Touching butt, group sex...what else? He couldn't hold a candle to the Kennedys or Clinton in abuse of women. (But, I do want to know the truth. Not the Democrat spin of it.) Looks like they're getting desperate to hang on to Cali. They won't.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:12 am
Quote:
Then, why do the Democrats feel Arnold posing for Mapplethorpe is even an issue? You may not, blatham, but plenty do. Very hypocritical, to me.
sofia...for goodness sakes...it ISN'T an issue. Homophobia is the issue. The attempt to suppress free expression in the arts by crusading christians is the issue. The willingness to forgo principle is the issue. It's because the photos are BY MAPPLETHORPE. It isn't about Arnold at all.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:16 am
Put it this way...if Mapplethorpe had taken photos of a thirty year old Bush sprawled over a divan with a glint in his eye, a tool belt, a teddy bear under his arm, and his hard cock in his hand, I'd have NO problem with Bush in that. But I would with every person who supported him politically where they had previously attacked Mapplethorpe and the NEA.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:20 am
Quote:
sofia...for goodness sakes...it ISN'T an issue

Then, someone needs to alert several Dem talking heads and the media. They seem to differ with your opinion.

Refreshed, and see your personal opinion. I agree with it.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:28 am
Now we's talkin
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:33 am
It's nothing to do with Ahnold's past daliances or misstatements. It's his lack of experienced leadership. If Planet Hollywood is the example,

fahget it.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:34 am
(He'll still likely get elected as a celebrity).
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 09:40 am
yes, the issue is the hypocrisy involved in voting for a candidate who has participated in behavior of the type they repudiate. Although, I'll admit, no one's perfect. I'd sure hate to have the media digging up my past, looking for instances of hypocrisy. Still, to use these photos to fight Schwarzenegger is fair politics, I think. There's nothing sneaky about it. It's direct and out in the open.

And as to Clinton and his mistreatment of women, I'm reading Nigel Hamilton's biography of Clinton, Bill Clinton An American Journey. In it are some wonderful quotations from interviews with Gennifer Flowers.

on page 316:

Quote:
"when Gennifer undressed the Attorney General (Clinton) she was surprised to find he was, "not particularly well endowed" -- indeed was downright small for a man his size, but there was scarcely time to take this in, for "his desire to please was astonishing," she recalled. "He was determined to satisfy me, and boy did he! At times I thought my head would explode with the pleasure."

To his credit, oral sex, for Bill, was not simply a matter of being served but of serving a woman -- and being rewarded for doing so. "This man made me want to give back what he was giving," Gennifer recalled, "and what he was giving was sensational."


and then:

Quote:
"His stamina amazed me. We made love over and over that night," Gennifer recalled of their four-hour tryst, "and he never seemed to run out of energy."


Now, a girl has to find this characteristic of Bill's very interesting. Don't you think so, Sofia? Laughing If this is victimization, I'll have to say, I'm game to be victimized any day or night. :wink:
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 10:06 am
this Arnold thing is a living example of two great truisms.......

1. what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

2. don't dish it out if you can't take it.

As life has once again proven...everything you need to know, you learned in kindergarten........playground rules......
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 12:57 pm
The Republicans amaze me in their ability to constant turn tables based on the practice they are breaking. The Arnold hype is total hypocrisy of the right. But, continue on..............
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 01:11 pm
The Republicans figure California is never going to accept their social agenda anyway, so they consider Arnolds left leaning ideology in that respect a nonissue, they just care that he's on the 'R' ticket. How convenient to overlook that and bet on Arnold having the ability to fix the financial situation.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 01:34 pm
Somewhere in an undisclosed location there exists a photo set of me ... totally nude, disporting about in frolicsom manner on a bearskin rug. I don't really recall that particular shoot; it was conducted a few weeks before my first birthday. The evidence remains, however, for what it may be worth.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 01:36 pm
There may be one of you sucking on.............ohhhh, never mind.................. Shocked
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 01:39 pm
Just how many Californians of voting age have not themselves either participated in, or turned a blind but informed eye toward, inappropriate or extralegal behavior involving sex or drugs?
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 01:53 pm
This sounds like a great topic - how many Republicans can we fit on the head of a pin????
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/06/2024 at 01:35:43