@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:I don't know if an Islamistic rule would have been better.
Erdogan is the Islamist ruler. Given the secular nature of the Turkish military it is likely that the coup would have installed a secular dictator.
Walter Hinteler wrote:One of the few positive benefits of the autocrat Erdogan was to prune the power of army.
That's actually a negative, considering the positive influence of the Turkish military verses the negative influence of Erdogan.
Also, the method that Erdogan used to damage the military was to unjustly imprison military leaders on false charges.
I suppose being imprisoned on false charges is not nearly as bad as being a Kurd and having your children massacred by Erdogan, but horrible injustices are unforgivable nonetheless.
Walter Hinteler wrote:A coup is merely the proof that parts of the Turkish society are unable to cope democratically with the authoritarianism of Erdogan.
It is impossible to cope democratically where there is no democracy. Turkey's "democracy" is just as pretend as Russia's "democracy".