@NorthernInquirer,
Hello, I thought you may have meant 'race specific attraction' when using the word prejudice. The reason I asked for clarification is that it appears that the people you hang out with, have redefined the word 'prejudice' for their own purpose...while relying on the negative connotations still associated with the word to strengthen a very weak belief.
Here's some actual definitions.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/prejudice
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/prejudice
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/prejudice
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/prejudice
I haven't directly posted the 'definitions' directly because dictionaries find it hard to define (same with a lot of subjective / emotionally laden words). Rather, they post examples to clarify the definition. Have a read of them.
Any common understanding of the word prejudice, usually revolves around 2 themes:
- preconceived idea/feelings about ####
- the preconceived idea/feeling is negative in nature
As an example of usage: if there are only 2 people in a room, it makes no sense to say 'A is prejudiced for B', but it makes perfect sense to say 'A is prejudiced against B'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point of my previous questions was:
- do you hold negative ideas of any race, just because you are attracted to a particular race? You said no, so your attraction to a race automatically fails the definition of prejudice
- is attraction a negative feeling towards any race? No. So again, your attraction automatically fails the definition of prejudice
- is your attraction preconceived idea? No...it's just an attraction. Attraction is much more basic than a feeling (it starts in the most primitive part of the brain at the bottom rear of your skull, while feelings start in the middle part of the brain. So it again fails the preconceived idea/feeling element of prejudice
...and yet you use the word prejudice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said that you see nothing wrong with being attracted to say, blondes, right?
Lets make Person A's attraction to:
- straight black hair. Nothing wrong with this, right?
Now, lets add in that Person A likes
-slim physiques. That's okay too. Some find it a bit shallow, but they don't find it racist or demeaning etc. (others are attracted to voluptuous physiques - each to their own)
And Person A also likes
- a tan. No problem with this. Could be argued to be a little shallow, but you never really hear people blowing up about this preference.
Person A also happens to be attracted to
- the sound of exotic accents. Quite okay by itself right? People love French accents, Irish accents etc.
All of these are quite normal attractions.
Suddenly person A realises that all these things are found in Oriental Women, and so finds themself having a preference for Oriental women.
But your friends find nothing wrong with attraction to blondes, but something wrong with attraction to Orientals? They think it stems from a completely different source, than attractions to individual physical looks?
It stems from exactly the same source.
----------------------------------------------------------
Again, I would point out that accepting such attractions as normal:
- doesn't fight against human nature
- doesn't throw up such blatant double standards
- doesn't throw up unsupportable logic
- doesn't negatively judge people
- and accepts other people for who they are