1
   

For the men...need your insight regarding husbands and porn

 
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2005 07:17 am
hsbnd10 wrote:


What makes something pornographic (in my humble opinion) is ANY form of media when it is used to cause arousal. What this actually means is what may be exotic art to someone may be porn to someone else.



I agree. But you can't deny that American's have taken nudity and made it dirty. We are taught as very young children that it is "wrong" to be naked. Why?

hsbnd10 wrote:

I still disagree with your assertion that some people need pornography (the act of allowing themselves to become sexually aroused through a form of media depicting someone who is not their spouse).


I never said they needed it. None of needs much of what we have. I think it is normal to want it or engage in it. Of course, not beyond reason.

hsbnd10 wrote:

Why should I dishonor my wife by seeking after materials concerning a stranger's sexuality to fill that need? The male psyche, when fed in this manner, begins to desire to fulfill these fantasies and begins to look for ways to make it happen. THIS IS THE NATURE OF MEN. The fact that some men will say it isn't so is nothing more than dishonesty.


I think you are going to make a lot of guys angry with this statement. Many of the men here admit to looking at porn but say they would never cheat on their wives. I think these are two very different things and the distinction between fantasy and reality is a line everyone must draw for himself.

hsbnd10 wrote:

Basically, I would actually say that, for me to watch a woman passionately kissing a man, and for me to become aroused, makes that into pornography (at least for me, and probably most men). No amount of nakedness is required, because the nakedness itself is not the evil.


If it turns you on and you feel guilty about it, then don't watch it. But don't make me stop watching what turns me on and I don't feel guilty about.

hsbnd10 wrote:

I would like to think that you are just confused about the hangups about nudity that you despise in our culture. You rightly assert that there is nothing wrong with a woman for loving sex. And you are also right that nudity is not bad by itself, but for me to intentionally look at a woman with lust in my heart (Jesus' definition) is bad. And by these standards, I am nowhere near perfect and could not claim to be holier than anybody.


I wish Lord Ellpus was here to tell you that American's have far more hangups about nudity than people of other countries.

hsbnd10 wrote:

I have already addressed this. Really, there ARE ACTUALLY some perspectives out there that are dangerous. I could (but, naturally, never would) start advocating Nazism or some other form of hate. What would be your response if I said:

"Live your life and let me live mine."

I am simply arguing that pornography is one of those things. I know you aware of the countless children and women whose lives have been changed forever by the aggressive sexual acts of men who let their desire for sexual gratification completely overwhelm their discernment between what is healthy and what is demented. The victims of this spirit of lust are surely as numerous, if not more, than the victims of the Holocaust.



First, unwanted children and aggressive sexual acts...I am assuming you are referring to rape. And rape is not (please don't get me started on this) a sexual act. It is a power act. Porn does not cause rape. Men do not get turned on and rape a woman because of blue balls. They might use porn to get turned on before a rape (highly unlikely since the actual act of rape is the turn on for most rapists) but then if the rapist did this, he could have just as well thought of sex to get aroused.

I really can't liken the survivors or victims of the Holocaust to the women whos lives are disrupted or hurt by porn. Anyone who allows their life to be ruined by this makes me sad. If you can't take responsibility for your happiness then you can't be angry when you are not happy. Too many women blame their unhappiness on their porn loving husbands. If you are unhappy, leave. Take responsibility.


hsbnd10 wrote:

Bella,

I think it would be revealing if you paid more attention to why you dislike kids so much. You cannot raise well-adjusted kids in an environment where there is so little guidance and such a plethora of choices about how to entertain yourself. Constant Temptation to experience pleasure with little pressure to fulfill responsibilities is foolish.

The bottom line is that people must use wisdom and restraint in deciding how to forge the environment that their children are raised and that, indeed, they themselves live in.


I don't dislike kids. Where did you get that? I dislike the way kids act today, with no respect for themselves or anyone else. I turned out ok. I didn't ever talk to my parents the way I hear kids talking to their parents now. I didn't get into trouble. I don't blame the kids. I blame the parents of the kids.

hsbnd10 wrote:

I have decided not to have any broadcast TV (cable or even networks) in our home because I think that an environment with broadcast TV is unlikely to be one that I can control. I cannot take off all the irreverent, violent and sexually explicit commercials during, what might be, a decent show. I also know about human nature concerning TV: most of us tend to turn it on and leave it on for hours as we lazily gawk at the manifold colors and sounds it spits out.

The same forms of restraint that I use on myself (with regards to porn) and that I am using to raise my children you would (it would seem) call ridiculously excessive. Yet, at the same time, you don't like kids today.


Music, tv and pictures don't cause more violence or sexually promiscuous behavior any more than anything else. If good values and morals are instilled into your children, you should need to worry about them falling into those traps. I wasn't sheltered from anything any more than any of my friends and I didn't do half the things they did. My parents gave me a respect for myself and for others and I knew right from wrong.


hsbnd10 wrote:

Open-mindedness doesn't mean letting everything go and letting everyone be. Instead it means a willingness to consider and understand other points of view before choosing your own (point of view).

All that said, I believe in the principle of people finding common ground, I think that at least some has been found.


I am considering your perspective and I am happy you've considered mine. I do have to apologize for having said anything that was a person attack. I try and keep myself from those kinds of debate technique.

I just find it so frustrating that people (not necessarily you) think that the world is what is causing all the problems in peoples lives. But the reality is that you make your own destiny. You make your life what it is. You might not be able to be rich or famous but I know plenty of people who accept what they have and are happier than those who have more than they could ever want. It always comes back to taking responsibility for our actions. And being accountable for what we do and say. If crap goes wrong in my life, who do I have to blame? My mom? My husband? The world? No, me. I run my life. I control who I am and what I do. If these women just took responsibility and said to their husbands "Listen, I've tried to compromise with you but you continue to lie and hide this behind my back. If you don't stop, this is over." But they won't because they think that they can't live without him or that for some reason they should just deal with it. There are three options in any of these situations: Deal with it and let it be, leave him if he won't stop or compromise and find a middle ground you can both be happy with. Why can't people just take responsibility for their own lives and quit blaming something else on their problems?

That is the one thing I have to say I am impressed with in you. You've made a decision regarding the way your children are to be raised and you refuse to allow anyone to tell you otherwise. Being told how to raise your kids is something else of a problem today. Parents let everyone else tell them how to raise their kids instead of going with what they know they should be doing; being a parent instead of a friend.
0 Replies
 
hsbnd10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2005 01:15 pm
WannabeRoyal said:

Quote:
The bachelor party where the married men were more into the strippers than the single men is a real similar situation as you not letting your kids watch TV.
You think that by raising you kids with no TV will make the difference of them being good kids/teens/young adults, etc... That goes back to the same thing. People have a natural tendency to crave the forbidden. This is usually the CAUSE of problems, NOT the solution to them.
Everyone knows while growing up, if you wanna have the most fun, hang out with the preacher's kids!


I think you are right in saying that, by itself, not letting my kids watch TV will not be the difference maker in what kind of people they grow up to be. My wife, who doesn't like my tendency towards legalism, is trying to (with some success) get me to believe is that by being good parents who fulfill our children's needs by being there for them, by loving them, by guiding them, by helping them to develop their God-given talents, and lastly, by not being hypocrits, is how we will raise good children. If I teach them not to drink, I don't drink. If I tell them I don't want them watching trash (and don't let them), then my wife and I don't go and watch trash when they go to bed.

I can see a danger in trying to over manage what my children do when they are not in my wife and I's care. My children must realize that I trust them to make their own decisions while they are on their own AND that means letting them be on their own enough to make some of those decisions.

But one thing I think we might really disagree on. I have ABSOLUTELY NO responsibility to make the world's trash readily available to my children. That is not wisdom. I don't put PLAYBOYS AND PENTHOUSES all over my home and then do my best to never look at them. Using common sense, if I think something is a dangerous and, in this case, wholly unnecessary temptation, then I don't put the porn in my house period.

As far as TV goes, another reason I don't want it in the house (they still watch videos, just nothing "broadcast"), is that it distracts us from paying attention to each other (I have to watch myself with how much I attention I pay to the computer. ) But having 1000 channels of crap for my children to flip through every day in search of some "worthy" programming is nothing more than an idiotic waste of time. For me to really care about College Sports, Pro Sports, National Team Soccer, Grand Slam Tennis Events, etc, etc., ad nauseum; For my wife to care about the pathetic sit coms, dramas, reality shows, etc., etc., ad nauseum; For my kids to care about all the different animal shows, kid's game shows, Disney movies, and ridiculous cartoons, etc., etc., ad nauseum; when in the world would we, as a family, have time for each other? What benefit is any of that junk to my life, or my ability to be a blessing to my family or others, or my ability to teach my children to be a blessing to family and others?

As Steven Covey would say, Our Circle of Concern should, for the most part, be within our Circle of Influence. I don't know what possible influence I can have on the little people inside my TV set. To invest time in such a venture (TV) seems pointless.

So, while the content of what is on TV is one of my major considerations, the mere fact that it eats away at the time that we have for each other is another major consideration of mine.

And concerning this bachelor party example. I disagree with the "obvious point" everyone seems to think this makes. Does the fact that the married men were more turned on at the bachelor party mean that their life, as a devoted married man, is unhealthy?

I don't think it proves anything of the kind. It only proves that the married men at the bachelor party were engaging in something that was not normal for them. Personally, I refused to let my older brother throw me a bachelor party for my 2nd marriage because I remembered how demented the first bachelor party he threw for me was, and because I wanted to honor my wife. Sure, I could have let him throw me one, and I am sure that I would have been much more turned on than some of the single men during this party. But that would mean that the disciplined and precious devotion that I have for my wife is a bad thing?

I wonder if you assume that my sex life, due to my conservatism on this issue, is dull. Not so. While I don't care to go into particulars, my wife and I's sex life is fantastic, we love to make love and we don't have any hangups about enjoying it.

Sorry, I just don't think that I, nor any other married man, needs some "healthy dose" of porn. In fact, at times when my wife and I toyed with watching with some of this years ago, it did nothing but make us both feel cheap and dirty. If anything was ever wrong with our sex life, it wasn't because we needed more porn.
0 Replies
 
hsbnd10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Jun, 2005 09:05 am
Bella Dea,

Enjoyed reading your last post.

Here are some responses:

Quote:
I agree. But you can't deny that American's have taken nudity and made it dirty. We are taught as very young children that it is "wrong" to be naked. Why?


In America, people may have come from different cultures, but the American "melting pot" culture is a very weak one. If we have a culture, it is one of capitalism. People from all over the world use their particular talents to make a living here. However, they unfortunately leave their culture behind (for what made their culture unique was the mix between the people and the land). So though we have a country that appears to be diverse in terms of race, but it has nowhere near the real diversity of Europe.

That said, people here, in general, have very little appreciation for tradition or, for that matter, the arts. It is probably directly proportional to the number of miles that the United States is from France.

But our country's capitalism also thrives on exploitation. So much of the nudity presented to us is presented to us, not as art, but as an exploitation of someone (usually women) for profit.

Quote:
I think you are going to make a lot of guys angry with this statement. Many of the men here admit to looking at porn but say they would never cheat on their wives. I think these are two very different things and the distinction between fantasy and reality is a line everyone must draw for himself.


The men may not intend to actually cheat on their wives (and they may never), but some would argue that by seeking out the pornography and indulging in it means they have already cheated on them spiritually (whatever that may mean to you). At the very least, I still would argue that it is counterproductive to a man's efforts to stay faithful to his wife if he indulges in porn. If he needs to "take care of himself" in her absence or during a dry spell between the two of them, that might, unfortunately, be a necessity (unfortunately b/c it is not as fulfilling sexually or emotionally).

Quote:
I wish Lord Ellpus was here to tell you that American's have far more hangups about nudity than people of other countries.


I believe you (and to some extent know of this first hand) Bella, there is no need to have Lord Ellpus elaborate on it. Unless, of course, he just wants to.

Quote:
First, unwanted children and aggressive sexual acts...I am assuming you are referring to rape. And rape is not (please don't get me started on this) a sexual act. It is a power act. Porn does not cause rape. Men do not get turned on and rape a woman because of blue balls. They might use porn to get turned on before a rape (highly unlikely since the actual act of rape is the turn on for most rapists) but then if the rapist did this, he could have just as well thought of sex to get aroused.


I would venture to say (I could be wrong, I'm just trying to use common sense) that most rapists do not have a very healthy view of women or sexuality. Within church circles, it is very common to see people diving into a lifestyle of unhealthy deviation through an obsession with porn. Being a woman, I still think you are underestimating the effect it has on men. When a man becomes obsessed with obtaining sexual pleasure he will get himself that pleasure however he must find it. As this quest for pleasure becomes less and less and fulfilling, it, subsequently, becomes more and more deviant, the desires morph into something more sinister-evolving into a sick desire for power and control (of which sex is just a part). For some men, this turns into molesting little girls and boys and raping women).

Quote:
I don't dislike kids. Where did you get that? I dislike the way kids act today, with no respect for themselves or anyone else. I turned out ok. I didn't ever talk to my parents the way I hear kids talking to their parents now. I didn't get into trouble. I don't blame the kids. I blame the parents of the kids.


Bella, I'm not trying to say you dislike kids. You are probably a lot like me. As a teacher, I can establish a certain climate in the classroom where the high school kids and I enjoy learning together. I'm crazy about these kids in that environment (or whenever they are at their "best"-the same applies to us adults too, I guess). Yet, when I see some of the same kids in a different venue in an assembly or own their own before or after school their behavior can be very, shall we say, disappointing? I agree, it is the parent's fault. Yet, at the same time, to some degree it is society and government as well.

A friend of mine related a story to me the other day about a group (tribe, clan, whatever you call it.) of apes who loved each other and were well adjusted. Enter man and his research. The researchers started bestowing gifts upon these animals, bananas, trinkets, (other things apes like) etc. The moral of the story was that the apes started fighting viciously over the "freebies" to the point to where the "leader" of the apes was even killed. What was once a peaceful pack of apes was now a bunch of selfish, war-mongering apes. Anyway, (I'm a great storyteller, huh?) you get the point.

I think our culture is a lot like that. Those who have not been able to take care of themselves have had plenty given to them, and so many have learned to live like that. Conversely, through inheritance even those who have (the wealthy) have even more given to them, and their character suffers. Lastly, even the middle class in America is relatively "rich" when it comes to living comfortably.

As humans, we don't seem to function well when we live lives of excess and we have things just "given" to us. I guess that is why I am attracted to simpler value systems, philosophies, and religions.

Quote:
Music, tv, and pictures don't cause more violence or sexually promiscuous behavior any more than anything else.


But I think you would agree that it is not necessary for me to constantly feed them media when we all have much more interesting and fulfilling lives to lead than what this offers.

Quote:
I just find it so frustrating that people (not necessarily you) think that the world is what is causing all the problems in peoples lives.


My only aspiration is to try encourage people to consider shutting the world's "noise" out a little bit, so they can think a little bit (engage in some problem-solving for their lives) and communicate with each other. My wife and I went through a pretty rough spot years ago because both of us so enjoyed our distractions that we never planned or communicated. So whenever a problem would present itself to the marriage, we were neither dedicated to or experienced in the art of problem solving (together) and we had absolutely no communication skills. Everytime there was a problem, the situation quickly spiraled into a heated argument that went absolutely nowhere.

I see so many of these people online who talk about how troubled their marriages are and I can tell by what they say that they are in the same boat my wife and I were in (unfortunately, most of them have much more serious issues to deal with than we did).

So as you said, the root of the problem is not pornography, but it is, similarly, the selfish desires living and breeding in their hearts. We all, from time to time, put our selfish desires in front of what is best for family, friends, community and mankind.

This, of course, all goes back to the major question. How should mankind find happiness and contentment? Should it be through material things that we enjoy in solitude or through living things that we can enjoy together (or a healthy mix of both)?

I have found that the more I rely on lights, sounds, and images to bring me gratification that my desires tend to be much more selfish and my contentedness much more shallow.

I have found, on the other hand, that the more I rely on playing with, eating with, praying with, helping and teaching others for my happiness that the more real and lasting is my joy.

I must go for now and I am about to go on vacation. Be back Monday.

Have a good weekend!
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 07:02 am
hsbnd10 wrote:

That said, people here, in general, have very little appreciation for tradition or, for that matter, the arts. It is probably directly proportional to the number of miles that the United States is from France.

But our country's capitalism also thrives on exploitation. So much of the nudity presented to us is presented to us, not as art, but as an exploitation of someone (usually women) for profit.


Definitely. This country was founded on exploitation and you make a very interesting correlation...I hadn't thought of that before but it really makes sense.

hsbnd10 wrote:

The men may not intend to actually cheat on their wives (and they may never), but some would argue that by seeking out the pornography and indulging in it means they have already cheated on them spiritually (whatever that may mean to you). At the very least, I still would argue that it is counterproductive to a man's efforts to stay faithful to his wife if he indulges in porn. If he needs to "take care of himself" in her absence or during a dry spell between the two of them, that might, unfortunately, be a necessity (unfortunately b/c it is not as fulfilling sexually or emotionally).


I cannot be convinced that fidelity is anything more than self control and choice. I think many men are able to balance porn and fidelity. Some aren't but I think those that cheat because of or as a result of porn would have cheated anyway.

Many people believe that masturbation in itself is "cheating" on a spouse. It all depends on the couple I guess.


hsbnd10 wrote:

I think our culture is a lot like that. Those who have not been able to take care of themselves have had plenty given to them, and so many have learned to live like that. Conversely, through inheritance even those who have (the wealthy) have even more given to them, and their character suffers. Lastly, even the middle class in America is relatively "rich" when it comes to living comfortably.


That IS our culture. Good people who suddenly come into money change. I've seen it. Run over all those in your path to the top. Sad.

hsbnd10 wrote:

But I think you would agree that it is not necessary for me to constantly feed them media when we all have much more interesting and fulfilling lives to lead than what this offers.


That is your decision and your home.

Quote:
I just find it so frustrating that people (not necessarily you) think that the world is what is causing all the problems in peoples lives.


hsbnd10 wrote:

My wife and I went through a pretty rough spot years ago because both of us so enjoyed our distractions that we never planned or communicated. So whenever a problem would present itself to the marriage, we were neither dedicated to or experienced in the art of problem solving (together) and we had absolutely no communication skills. Everytime there was a problem, the situation quickly spiraled into a heated argument that went absolutely nowhere.


My husband and I have only been married for 2 years so we are still developing our marriage "coping skills"...so I can't really comment intelligently on this. :wink:


hsbnd10 wrote:

So as you said, the root of the problem is not pornography, but it is, similarly, the selfish desires living and breeding in their hearts. We all, from time to time, put our selfish desires in front of what is best for family, friends, community and mankind.

This, of course, all goes back to the major question. How should mankind find happiness and contentment? Should it be through material things that we enjoy in solitude or through living things that we can enjoy together (or a healthy mix of both)?


Healthy mix of both...the trouble is finding the balance. Too many people are indulgent and can't make a balance between the two.

hsbnd10 wrote:

I must go for now and I am about to go on vacation. Be back Monday.


Hope vacation was fun and relaxing! (So you could come back and argue with me. Smile )
0 Replies
 
WannaBeRoyal
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jun, 2005 07:35 pm
And concerning this bachelor party example. I disagree with the "obvious point" everyone seems to think this makes. Does the fact that the married men were more turned on at the bachelor party mean that their life, as a devoted married man, is unhealthy?

I don't think it proves anything of the kind. It only proves that the married men at the bachelor party were engaging in something that was not normal for them. Personally, I refused to let my older brother throw me a bachelor party for my 2nd marriage because I remembered how demented the first bachelor party he threw for me was, and because I wanted to honor my wife. Sure, I could have let him throw me one, and I am sure that I would have been much more turned on than some of the single men during this party. But that would mean that the disciplined and precious devotion that I have for my wife is a bad thing?

I wonder if you assume that my sex life, due to my conservatism on this issue, is dull. Not so. While I don't care to go into particulars, my wife and I's sex life is fantastic, we love to make love and we don't have any hangups about enjoying it.

Sorry, I just don't think that I, nor any other married man, needs some "healthy dose" of porn. In fact, at times when my wife and I toyed with watching with some of this years ago, it did nothing but make us both feel cheap and dirty. If anything was ever wrong with our sex life, it wasn't because we needed more porn.[/quote]


I didn't say that I thought their lives were unhealthy because they were more interested in the stripper than the bachelors. Their lives could be perfect as far as they are concerned, but that doesn't mean that in a situation like described that they aren't going to get a good eyeful. The bachelors (assumably) see different women all the time, this would be nothing new nor all that exciting to them. Also it is human nature for man (more-so than women) to exaggerate their excitement to show their "manhood". I've even caught myself doing it... <gasp>

I commend you and your wife on your parenting! It does seem that too many parents use the TV as a babysitter and do NO monitoring of the kids' social life and influences.

As far as your sex-life, if it's fulfilling to you and your wife, congrats! For many couples this is the number one cause of friction (no pun,..) in their marriage and will ultimately lead to divorce and bitterness towards their once best friend.

And no one will EVER hear me say that porn is the CURE for an unhappy sex life! You can put a Band-aid on a sore, but the infection will still spread.....

I am quick to speak my mind, BUT, in my defense, I have no problem listening to other views and learning from them. (Occasionally you may even catch me admitting that I COULD BE wrong...) <giggle>
0 Replies
 
bien
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jun, 2005 11:46 pm
I'm new, but jumping in here. Although I may disagree, hope I'm still welcomed. Not even sure where to start.

I agree with the majority of what hsbnd10 has posted.

#1. For one to believe that our society today, our media, and all other garbage we're bombarded with daily has no effect on our behaviors, thoughts, actions is ignorant. In my opinion, that's equivalent to stating that there's not one thing you've witnessed, heard, been informed of that has affected you. It's a crock. Every single thing you encounter helps you form your own personal ideals. This most definitely applies to children and adults incapable of rational thought.

#2. Rape. Obviously you can't trace rape back to a liking for porn. That would be ridiculous. Rape is solely about power. However, I have to ask...what kind of power are rapists attempting to obtain? The majority of the time, it's against women. You can't deny that. Too often, women are exploited and viewed in a sexual manner.

#3. Porn. Sorry to be blunt here, but I see no "need" for it. I don't fall for the BS of men being visual creatures. To me, it's another lame excuse. Funny as it may be, my husband has done so in the past, but I can't really see past the obvious. Fact is, you have some woman and/or women who are willing to exploit themselves for money. An unknown woman(the excuse) who is for some reason willing to exploit everything intimate about herself for your own satisfaction. Yet, some have wives and as sad as it is, the wives will agree. "Oh, he's just being a man"..right? Well, how about you(women) be a "woman" all the time? Think he'd be accepting of that? That means not letting a single thought pass without a talk. Sorry, but I just don't buy into this. I've been the wife that's "accepting", but in the end, I only compromised my own personal beliefs. I've yet to meet a woman that's okay, perfectly fine, with her husband getting his kicks from another woman, even it's in pretty print, an image on a screen.... Women need emotional connection. So, if your husband was lacking in that department, would he allow and/or accept you having an "emotional" affair with another man? Men are visual, women are more emotional. Is there a difference?

#4. Finally, huh? Lol. The "Me" attitude. It relates back to everything I've posted thus far. We live in a society that's only concerned with "me". We've been bombarded with the "you're responsible for all of your feelings" attitude. While I believe in being accountable for your own actions and certain feelings, the time comes when you admit that another's actions can bring on some not-so-pleasant feelings. Happiness isn't a constant state of mind. To believe that your loved one's actions don't directly affect you is foolish. Some say if you're not happy, then leave. While this may ring true in the beginning of a relationship, it doesn't apply to those who've put much time and energy into a relationship. It almost implies that individuals are disposable. Simply not true. When you're in love, more often than not, you're not thinking logically. Applying textbook knowledge or attempting to have robotic emotions isn't being realistic. Up the ante if you have children.

Again, hope I at least get a welcome. Maybe not. Enjoyed the reading though.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Jun, 2005 01:30 am
Welcome bien...enjoyed your post.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Jun, 2005 07:14 am
bien wrote:
I'm new, but jumping in here. Although I may disagree, hope I'm still welcomed. Not even sure where to start.

I agree with the majority of what hsbnd10 has posted.



All views welcomed here. We just like to argue. Very Happy

bien wrote:

#1. For one to believe that our society today, our media, and all other garbage we're bombarded with daily has no effect on our behaviors, thoughts, actions is ignorant. In my opinion, that's equivalent to stating that there's not one thing you've witnessed, heard, been informed of that has affected you. It's a crock. Every single thing you encounter helps you form your own personal ideals. This most definitely applies to children and adults incapable of rational thought.


Yes, but we are all capable of making our own decisions and choices. If you've been brought up well, you know how to make good choices. And *most* people are born with a sense of right and wrong. Music effects people, yes. But it isn't going to make you go out and do something you probably wouldn't have done without the music.


bien wrote:

#2. Rape. Obviously you can't trace rape back to a liking for porn. That would be ridiculous. Rape is solely about power. However, I have to ask...what kind of power are rapists attempting to obtain? The majority of the time, it's against women. You can't deny that. Too often, women are exploited and viewed in a sexual manner.


It's because women are easily overpowered. Men are just as exploited. Abercrombie and Fitch? Any romance novel? Women may be shown in greater volume but men are quickly catching up.

bien wrote:

#3. Porn. Sorry to be blunt here, but I see no "need" for it. I don't fall for the BS of men being visual creatures. To me, it's another lame excuse. Funny as it may be, my husband has done so in the past, but I can't really see past the obvious. Fact is, you have some woman and/or women who are willing to exploit themselves for money. An unknown woman(the excuse) who is for some reason willing to exploit everything intimate about herself for your own satisfaction.


We don't "need" cars. Or computers. Or coffee. Or ice cream. There are a lot of things we don't need but sure enjoy.

Why are you assuming they are being exploited? You have to be unwilling to be exploited. Prostitution is the one profession that's been around forever.

bien wrote:

Yet, some have wives and as sad as it is, the wives will agree. "Oh, he's just being a man"..right? Well, how about you(women) be a "woman" all the time? Think he'd be accepting of that? That means not letting a single thought pass without a talk. Sorry, but I just don't buy into this. I've been the wife that's "accepting", but in the end, I only compromised my own personal beliefs. I've yet to meet a woman that's okay, perfectly fine, with her husband getting his kicks from another woman, even it's in pretty print, an image on a screen.... Women need emotional connection. So, if your husband was lacking in that department, would he allow and/or accept you having an "emotional" affair with another man? Men are visual, women are more emotional. Is there a difference?


I know several, and there are some here. Why do you have to assume everyone is like you? You like chocolate ice cream but I am lactose intolerant so it hurts me (literally) to eat it. Does that mean you shouldn't be allowed to have chocolate ice cream in your own home? Just because something hurts someone else doesn't mean it is always bad.

bien wrote:

#4. Finally, huh? Lol. The "Me" attitude. It relates back to everything I've posted thus far. We live in a society that's only concerned with "me". We've been bombarded with the "you're responsible for all of your feelings" attitude. While I believe in being accountable for your own actions and certain feelings, the time comes when you admit that another's actions can bring on some not-so-pleasant feelings. Happiness isn't a constant state of mind. To believe that your loved one's actions don't directly affect you is foolish.


They do. But it is up to you and only you to make sure you are happy. If you rely on someone else to provide your happiness you are in for a long, hard life.

Accountability.

bien wrote:

Some say if you're not happy, then leave. While this may ring true in the beginning of a relationship, it doesn't apply to those who've put much time and energy into a relationship. It almost implies that individuals are disposable. Simply not true. When you're in love, more often than not, you're not thinking logically. Applying textbook knowledge or attempting to have robotic emotions isn't being realistic. Up the ante if you have children.


Being realistic? The reality of it is that people are just too lazy to leave. I don't want to have to work harder. I don't want to not have 2 cars to drive, a pool in the back yard, money to buy the things I want. I'd rather be miserable and bitch and moan all the time than take control of my life and have to work for what I want. That's the reality of it.

And you are kidding yourself if you think kids, no matter how young, don't pick up on mom or dads unhappiness. They know when you are fighting. And it's worse for kids to be in that environment than it is to divorce.
0 Replies
 
hsbnd10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Jun, 2005 03:32 pm
Bella,

I enjoyed reading your posts since I have been gone on vacation. BTW, we had a great vacation, thanks!

I also have enjoyed reading mosts of your responses and I am glad we are on much better discussion terms.

Now, for a quote of yours that I found very interesting (to say the least).

You wrote:
Quote:
And you are kidding yourself if you think kids, no matter how young, don't pick up on mom or dads unhappiness. They know when you are fighting. And it's worse for kids to be in that environment than it is to divorce.


Boy, is this ever a hot topic! I know that this has been the "standard rhetoric" for the justification of divorce for the last 15-20 years. However, a lot of people are starting to challenge this notion. In fact, a lot of people are starting to admit that they aren't sure they believe this any longer. Quite a bit of research on the effects of divorce on kids is suggesting that the long-term effect of divorce is a very cruel one for kids. I think the jury is definitely out on whether or not divorce is "better" for kids than an unhappy marriage.

Naturally, the issue of exactly how "unhappy" the parents are will play a big role in whether or not the kids might be better off.

Often, the "unhappy" partner in the marriage is usually the most selfish partner in the marriage. That selfishness often does not end with a divorce and new marriage. Also, the children's suffering only multiplies. The children now have the (what has been found to form permanent and significant scars) pain of separation from one parent and the introduction of new debates and arguments that arise due to stepparents (often with serious issues between stepchild and stepparent).

Also, what seems less obvious is that the old arguments don't die. As long as both parents continue to be a part of the children's lives, animosities between the children's parents still remain. There may not be as many loud arguments in front of the children, but they still continue, and the children are still aware of them.

Add to this the frustration and anger of a child caused by overhearing the derision of their absent parent by their other parent and stepparent.

Add to this the way these children have to constantly shift the "house rules" they have to live by as they go back and forth between mom and dad.

Add to this the "bailout" approach to problem solving that they take into their lives. If we can't solve a problem in 10 minutes, 2 weeks, or a few months, then it just ain't worth solving.

Yes, yes, Bella, there are extreme cases where divorce is best for the kids. But I would argue that these cases would be those where one parent is simply not fit to be a parent. Unfit enough for that parent to have no rights to keep the children.

I must go, I hope we are still on amiable terms, (I'm sure we are) but your quote got my goat.
0 Replies
 
hsbnd10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Jun, 2005 07:49 am
WannabeRoyal,

How's it going?

To respond to some of your posts.

Quote:
As far as your sex-life, if it's fulfilling to you and your wife, congrats! For many couples this is the number one cause of friction (no pun,..) in their marriage and will ultimately lead to divorce and bitterness towards their once best friend.


WannabeRoyal, I wonder why this is. I think I have touched it in some of my posts. We all get so wrapped up in our own wants that we don't fully engage the needs of others in our family.

As far as men are concerned, this is where I think the porn is especially destructive, the more I lust after the "perfect" beauty of the woman on the big screen, the less appealing my wife looks from a purely visual perspective. Yet, if I don't do that, and stay focused on my wife, our friendship, our lives together, and OUR love life, then dissatisfaction with my wife is not able to take root.

For women, they may have trouble getting turned on because of what I just said, there husbands are paying so darn little attention to them, except for when they (the husbands) want "it". Now, I'm speaking in generalities here, there are plenty of other causes and other deep-rooted problems, but I think this is often the major plot.

I can't tell you how many men I hear about who spend much of there free time with some sort of extracurricular activity (like golf), or, when they come in from work, they turn on the sports and the news for hours (or they jump on the internet). The bottom line is that people who are supposed to be cherishing each other cherish, instead, some other hobby that does not involve the other person. When my wife was watching SURVIVOR did I want to watch it? No. And when I wanted to watch the USA National Soccer Team did my wife want to watch? No.

And even if we were watching the same thing, what is the quality of the interaction that my wife and I are having?

Anyway, people's sex lives are usually much more healthy when they stay devoted to each other in more ways than one: heart, mind, and body.

Below are two great books for people trying to refocus on the needs of their spouse. I enjoyed them and was helped by them immensely.

THE FIVE LOVE LANGUAGES-Gary Chapman
HIS NEEDS/HER NEEDS-Willard Harley

BTW, if you want to quote something, scroll down to the quote, copy it, paste it in your response, then (AND THIS IS THE IMPORTANT PART) block it with your mouse and click <Quote> at the top of the reply window. I hope you don't mind my suggestion, it will make your posts easier to read.

Quote:
I am quick to speak my mind, BUT, in my defense, I have no problem listening to other views and learning from them. (Occasionally you may even catch me admitting that I COULD BE wrong...) <giggle>


Yeah, I hear you. My views have changed over the years, but they do so very slowly. I usually cry when someone proves me wrong (just kidding).

Quote:
I commend you and your wife on your parenting! It does seem that too many parents use the TV as a babysitter and do NO monitoring of the kids' social life and influences.


Thanks, but, as I've said, I don't think this makes us perfect parents. One of the things we struggle with (and is usually suggested to be a good idea by the "experts") is keeping our kids on a pretty regular schedule and teaching your children to regularly do chores to help them learn responsibility.

That said, I don't know what our game plan is going to be when our children reach adolescence, my wife and I have some very different views. (yikes!)
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Jun, 2005 07:57 am
hsbnd, I was very sick yesterday and am pretty ill today yet but I will come back and repond. Just can't think today.

But just as a note, The 5 Love Languages is a good book.
0 Replies
 
hsbnd10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Jun, 2005 11:01 am
Bien,

Welcome to the forum!

I'm pretty new to the forum as well.

You recently stated:

Quote:
Fact is, you have some woman and/or women who are willing to exploit themselves for money. An unknown woman(the excuse) who is for some reason willing to exploit everything intimate about herself for your own satisfaction.


Agreed, think of the ways our selfish desires to be entertained exploits other people. This applies to more than just porn. Like action flicks? How many people have died on movie sets trying to pull off stunts? I may be going a little over board here, but I can't help but feel just a little responsible for things like this when I know that, by providing a market for their product, I help tempt those in Hollywood to do the things they do.

A clearer example: I offer you a million dollars to cheat on your spouse. If you decide to take the million dollars and you go and ruin your marriage for the money, is it your fault for being weak? And am I blameless? I would hope the answer is obvious-it is evil of me to tempt you to do something I know would be harmful to you and your well-being. But obviously, the blame is also yours for choosing to value the money before your marriage.

But here is an interesting question for everyone. Does my culpability in this situation grow in proportion to the amount of money I offer you to cheat on your spouse. Would some of you actually argue that I am not guilty at all for offering the money?

Quote:
In my opinion, that's equivalent to stating that there's not one thing you've witnessed, heard, been informed of that has affected you. It's a crock. Every single thing you encounter helps you form your own personal ideals. This most definitely applies to children and adults incapable of rational thought.


Again, agreed. And let me add that what I choose to do with my time and how I spend it (on the whole) says something about who I am as a person. If I regularly indulge myself by enjoying media that is of very questionable content, it does not matter how well I was raised and whether or not my behavior changes for the worse because of what I have been doing, the point is that my decision to indulge is the issue because it bears witness to what is in my heart.

Quote:
I've yet to meet a woman that's okay, perfectly fine, with her husband getting his kicks from another woman, even it's in pretty print, an image on a screen.... Women need emotional connection.


What I have often found to be the case (not always) is that a woman will allow her husband to "play around" with the idea of being with other women because she wants to have the same right to "play around" with the idea of being with other men. There are a growing number of people out there who have "open marriages". That is, we can both sleep around and have fun and party but at the end of the day we will come back to the same house, pay the bills together, and raise our kids together. This is a very sad situation and attests to the difficulties people have moderating their desires.
0 Replies
 
hsbnd10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Jun, 2005 11:09 am
Bella,

Take good care of your husband. You didn't say you were sick, too, did you?

Take your time.

hsbnd10
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 05:02:15