Which Religion is the One True Religion?

Oh yeah, AU, 144,000 of them get to live happily ever after . . .

"The end of religion is foretold in the bible. Did you know that?"

Future discoveries by scientists will eventually refute everything in the bible. It's ironic that christinans believe everything the bible says, but that's another mistake of the bible that will be refuted, because there will always be some form of "religion." Buddhism doesn't rely on gods; it's about the self. Buddhims, taoism, confucianism are all religions that are not based on some omnipotent god, and they will survive long after the christian god is laughed out of existence.

"The Truth and Life" you and many others believe in are nothing but fiction. The bible has no support - except the bible. If you really want to learn about "truth and life," study philosophy. I'm told that buddhism is one of the better philosophy for learning about truth and life. Christianity has too many "thou shalts" that contradicts each other. Better to seek a simpler lifestyle without all that man-made dogma.

"The end of religion is foretold in the bible. Did you know that?"

Future discoveries by scientists will eventually refute everything in the bible. It's ironic that christinans believe everything the bible says, but that's another mistake of the bible that will be refuted, because there will always be some form of "religion." Buddhism doesn't rely on gods; it's about the self. Buddhims, taoism, confucianism are all religions that are not based on some omnipotent god, and they will survive long after the christian god is laughed out of existence.

Have no idea of what you two jokers are going on and on about...but if either of you actually ever gets to the point, I'll be more than delighted to reply.

real life wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

real life wrote:

Directors of pro-life CPCs will tell you that when a mother-to-be sees her baby on the ultrasound, it's like a light bulb switches on in her head. It's a baby, there he is.

And all this emotional stuff merely makes the decision harder...it does not, for the most part, stop the decision from being made.

Yeah Frank actually it does often stop the decision to abort from being made when a mother can see her unborn on the ultrasound.

And why is giving a mother access to medical information , such as an ultrasound, "emotional stuff" ?

You call yourself pro-choice. Shouldn't she make the most informed choice possible?

I repeat:

And all this emotional stuff merely makes the decision harder...it does not, for the most part, stop the decision from being made.

Try to think, Life...before you post.

The choice is made! The CHOICE is not always to go through with the abortion....the CHOICE...is to have a CHOICE to either have one or not to have one.

Christ...I hate having to explain basics. You'd think a brain would be an absolute minimum requirement for posting in this forum.

cicerone imposter wrote:

"The end of religion is foretold in the bible. Did you know that?"

Future discoveries by scientists will eventually refute everything in the bible. It's ironic that christinans believe everything the bible says, but that's another mistake of the bible that will be refuted, because there will always be some form of "religion." Buddhism doesn't rely on gods; it's about the self. Buddhims, taoism, confucianism are all religions that are not based on some omnipotent god, and they will survive long after the christian god is laughed out of existence.

If you were willing to sit still for a few minutes and expand on your asseveration that the bible has no support except the bible, you would find that the bible does indeed support itself. You would then realize that God did not set Adam and Eve up to fail. Who knows what else you might discover?

Frank Apisa wrote:

Have no idea of what you two jokers are going on and on about...but if either of you actually ever gets to the point, I'll be more than delighted to reply.

Certainly you must know Frank. It was this exchange where you "whiffed", completely and totally sidestepping the questions.

Frank Apisa wrote:

real life wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

real life wrote:

Directors of pro-life CPCs will tell you that when a mother-to-be sees her baby on the ultrasound, it's like a light bulb switches on in her head. It's a baby, there he is.

And all this emotional stuff merely makes the decision harder...it does not, for the most part, stop the decision from being made.

Yeah Frank actually it does often stop the decision to abort from being made when a mother can see her unborn on the ultrasound.

And why is giving a mother access to medical information , such as an ultrasound, "emotional stuff" ?

You call yourself pro-choice. Shouldn't she make the most informed choice possible?

I repeat:

And all this emotional stuff merely makes the decision harder...it does not, for the most part, stop the decision from being made.

Try to think, Life...before you post.

The choice is made! The CHOICE is not always to go through with the abortion....the CHOICE...is to have a CHOICE to either have one or not to have one.

Christ...I hate having to explain basics. You'd think a brain would be an absolute minimum requirement for posting in this forum.

"The CHOICE..is to have a CHOICE....." What kind of mumbo jumbo is that?

So if the mother views an ultrasound of her unborn, is she being denied a choice? Did suddenly her choice go away and she is whisked into another universe with only one choice?

That is really lame. "The choice is to have a choice......." Sounds like Hillary on 'ludes.

And:

Shouldn't she make the most informed choice possible?

You're going to confuse Frank with all this emotional stuff like why a woman grieves whan she miscarries.

Anyone who cannot see that Adam and Eve were set up by the disgusting god of the Bible...simply is not bright enough to be arguing this kind of stuff.

Anyone who thinks they can make this murderous, barbaric god into a loving, compassionate, understanding god...is much, much too terrified of the god to ever realistically assess anything in the Bible.

This supposed biblical defense is farce!

You folks are a laugh.

She should make whatever decision she chooses....without scum trying to make her feel guilty about her decision just because they are trying to stick their noses up some god's ass.

Or at least, that is my opinion.

Adam and Eve were not "set up".

They had a free unhindered choice and they chose "unwisely"...

Can you not comprehend that the original sin may have been "their" fault and theirs alone?

Do you not have any concept of accountability Frank?

Do you want to know my opinion?

Well,

When a woman who is heading into an abortion clinic for her seventh "anonymous" abortion

... well I think it should be fine if she wants to use abortion as a contraceptive... but, her name should go on a list on the internet along with the father of the child and they should be listed with the known pedophiles...

That is my opinion...

Other than the use of abortion as a form of contraceptive I am fine with a woman having choice if she wants an abortion.

RexRed wrote:

Adam and Eve were not "set up".

They were placed in a situation of temptation...with the Tempter of all Tempters there to help them be tempted. And your god withheld from them the one thing that might have prevented them from yielding to the temptation. Your god did not allow them to know the difference between right and wrong...between good and evil.

That is the point of the story, Rex. You god did not want them to eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil...of right and wrong.

Quote:

They had a free unhindered choice and they chose "unwisely"...

They did not know good from evil, Rex....they did not know right from wrong. How can you say they chose unwisely?

They chose one of two options...neither of which to them was right or wrong or good or evil.

THEY WERE SET UP BY THE BARBARIC god OF THE BIBLE.

Quote:

Can you not comprehend that the original sin may have been "their" fault and theirs alone?

Can you not recognize a sting operation when you see it? Can you not tell when someone has been set up for failure?

Can you not see that the idiot god of the Bible punished them....and all the rest of humanity....for something they had absolutely no way of knowing was wrong or evil?

What does it take to wake you people up?

Quote:

Do you not have any concept of accountability Frank?

Yes...do you?

Do you not see that if the god...in this pathetic myth....set them up by refusing to let them know what was right and what was wrong...the accountability for all of this accrues to the idiot god...not to Adam and Eve.

Adam and Eve knew the conditions (all trees but one) and the were told the consequences (on that day thou shalt surely die)...

They had a choice...