33
   

Which Religion is the One True Religion?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 01:44 pm
A little boy was walking down a dirt road after church one Sunday afternoon
when he came to a crossroads where he met a little girl coming from the
other direction.

"Hello," said the little boy.

"Hi," replied the little girl.

"Where are you going?" asked the little boy.

"I've been to church this morning and I'm on my way home," answered the
little girl.

"Me too," replied the little boy. "I'm also on my way home from church."

"Which church do you go to?" asked the little boy.

"I go to the Baptist church back down the road," replied the little girl.
"What about you?"

"I go to the Catholic church back at the top of the hill," replied the
little boy.

They discover that they are both going the same way so they decided that
they'd walk together.

They came to a low spot in the road where spring rains had partially flooded
the road so there was no way that they could get across to the other side
without getting wet.

"If I get my new Sunday dress wet my Mom's going to skin me alive," said the
little girl.

"My Mom'll tan my hide too if I get my new Sunday suit wet," replied the
little boy.

"I tell you what I think I'll do," said the little girl. "I'm gonna pull off
all my clothes and hold them over my head and wade across."

"That's a good idea," replied the little boy. "I'm going to do the same
thing with my suit."

So they both undressed and waded across to the other side without getting
their clothes wet.

They were standing there in the sun waiting to drip dry before putting their
clothes back on when the little boy finally remarked, "You know, I never did
realize before just how much difference there really is between a Baptist
and a Catholic."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 01:45 pm
A little boy was walking down a dirt road after church one Sunday afternoon
when he came to a crossroads where he met a little girl coming from the
other direction.

"Hello," said the little boy.

"Hi," replied the little girl.

"Where are you going?" asked the little boy.

"I've been to church this morning and I'm on my way home," answered the
little girl.

"Me too," replied the little boy. "I'm also on my way home from church."

"Which church do you go to?" asked the little boy.

"I go to the Baptist church back down the road," replied the little girl.
"What about you?"

"I go to the Catholic church back at the top of the hill," replied the
little boy.

They discover that they are both going the same way so they decided that
they'd walk together.

They came to a low spot in the road where spring rains had partially flooded
the road so there was no way that they could get across to the other side
without getting wet.

"If I get my new Sunday dress wet my Mom's going to skin me alive," said the
little girl.

"My Mom'll tan my hide too if I get my new Sunday suit wet," replied the
little boy.

"I tell you what I think I'll do," said the little girl. "I'm gonna pull off
all my clothes and hold them over my head and wade across."

"That's a good idea," replied the little boy. "I'm going to do the same
thing with my suit."

So they both undressed and waded across to the other side without getting
their clothes wet.

They were standing there in the sun waiting to drip dry before putting their
clothes back on when the little boy finally remarked, "You know, I never did
realize before just how much difference there really is between a Baptist
and a Catholic."
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 01:45 pm
CI

Can you say the word "administration"?

Very good girls and boys...

There are at least 7 "administrations" in the Bible...


There is the fall administration (the fall of lucifer)

There is the a paradise administration (the fall of Adam and Eve)

There is the patriarchal administration (the mighty men ruled with no written law)

Then there is the law administration (Moses)

Then there is the Christ administration (Christ alive on earth)

Then there is the grace administration (the church of Christ/God)

Then the Bible talks of another law administration after the grace one we are in now. (revelation)

Comment:
CI you are confusing scripture from these different administrations..

God chose to relate to humans by whatever spiritual means were available at the time.

It is not God that changed but humans that changed spiritually so they could walk closer with God...

Ultimately Jesus Christ came and brought spirit to where it is today...

So again, the "contradictions" are in your understanding...

You might start by isolating "to whom the verse is addressed" before you apply it to your purpose.

There is Jew, Gentile and the Church again "to whom is the word/verse addressed"?

Just because Christians misinterpret the Bible does not make it a book of contradictions...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 01:56 pm
No, it's just the words within it that povides all the contradictions.

Your logic needs some fine-tuning.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 02:29 pm
maporsche wrote:
RexRed wrote:

I suppose non-christians, few as they may be, are perfect angels... especially democrats.


First off, not that it matters, much of the population is "non-christian". There are millions of people who label themselves as "christian" but are not living the life a "good christian" should. They will die with sin on their heart and go to hell, same as you. I don't think it's possible to die with a clean soul, you'd have to repent the second before you death.

Someone stated that the soul goes to heaven because its reached perfection. Someone explain exactly how that is.


Second off, since you bring politics into this, show me where in the New Testament it says to bomb your neighbors (worldly neighbors, Iraq), MURDER innocent children (out of the womb, Iraq), and ignore and spit on the poor in the country (poor healthcare & rising costs & reduced coverage, ineffective welfare system, lowering taxes on the richest Americans, and creating fewer jobs (our unemployement is over 5%, with Clinton it was under 4%).

I know that I read Jesus say that somewhere, didn't I? Oh and don't even try to bring OT LAWS into this debate, you've repeated OVER AND OVER that those LAWS no longer apply, and that only what Jesus said applies. So defend those republican positions/actions with Jesus' words.


Do I understand you to say that Christians err because they do not have political positions that fulfill the commands of Jesus to feed the poor, care for the sick, etc ?

Are you saying that the government of the US should be fulfilling these commands of Christ?

I thought you were all for separation of church and state?

-----------------

Or would you prefer to discuss Iraq since you mentioned it twice? Saddam Hussein and his sons caused mass graves to be dug in Iraq with thousands of innocent victims. One notable method of torture was to run opponents thru the plastic shredder. Dismemberment and sending the body parts to the widow were also frequent favs. Are you saying that it is immoral to oppose such behavior?

Many innocent civilians unfortunately died in WWII while bringing the era of Hitler to a close. Tens of thousands , in fact.

Innocent civilians have lost their lives in Iraq also, no question. However, many more were brutally murdered under Hussein each year. The gassing of the Kurds comes to mind as another example.

Are you suggesting that Christians, in order to be true to Christ, must turn a blind eye to brutal regimes such as Iraq that murder their own people and are a danger to the world? Hussein's sponsorship of terrorism is well known and his stockpile of 500 tons of uranium just prior to the war is, as any reasonable person could see, NOT an indication of benign intent.

---------------------------

So go for it, maporsche. Either issue is open. You want the government to be the church? Or you want to defend Saddam's right to rule?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 02:43 pm
Free will?

"Not my will but thine be done..."
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 02:45 pm
Don't forget those questions, Rex.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 02:48 pm
RexRed wrote:
Free will?

"Not my will but thine be done..."


By the way....you do know to whom Jesus was addressing this comment, do you not?

The god who offers its "will" in the following passages:

"Slaves, male and female, you may indeed possess, provided you BUY them from among the neighboring nations. You may also BUY them from among the aliens who reside with you and from their children who are born and reared in your land. Such slaves YOU MAY OWN AS CHATTELS, and leave to your sons as their hereditary property, MAKING THEM PERPETUAL SLAVES. But you shall not lord it harshly over any of the Israelites, your kinsmen." Leviticus 25:44ff


"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be
put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their
lives." Leviticus 20:13


"If a man has a stubborn and unruly son who will not listen to
his father or mother, and will not obey them even though they
chastise him, his father and mother shall have him apprehended
and brought out to the elders at the gate of his home city, where
...his fellow citizens shall stone him to death." Deuteronomy 22:18ff


"When you march up to attack a city, first offer terms of peace.
If it agrees to your terms of peace and opens its gates to you,
all the people to be found in it shall serve you in forced labor.
But if it refuses to make peace with you and instead offers you
battle, lay siege to it, and when the Lord, your God, delivers it
into your hand, put every male in it to the sword, but the women
and children and livestock and all else in it that is worth
plunder you may take as your booty and you may use this plunder
of your enemies which the Lord, your God, has given you." Deuteronomy 20:10


"I, the Lord, your God, am a jealous God, inflicting punishments
for their fathers' wickedness on the children of those who hate
me, down to the third and fourth generation." Deuteronomy 5:9


"Therefore, he who has any of the following defects may not come
forward: he who is blind, or lame, or who has any disfigurement
or malformation, or crippled foot or hand....he may not approach
the veil nor go up to the altar on account of these defects; he
shall not profane these things that are sacred to me, for it is
I, the Lord, who make them sacred." Leviticus 21:18ff


So that is what Jesus was advocating. Doing these things...these bits of your god's "will."
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 02:53 pm
What is apparent, real life, is that your understanding is as flawed as are your logic and your debating skills. Your inanities, non sequiturs, straw men, and circular logic, quantifiably notable among, and in conjunction with, seemingly endless other sillyness flowing from your keyboard, are doing a fine job of damning your own proposition. Nothing you have written offers any support whatsoever for what you contend, but rather serves quite handsomely to confirm the criticisms levelled against your offerings and your proposition.

Now, once again, lets get back to square one - what about the Abrahamic mythopaeia validates it - let alone elevates its Protestant Christian subset above any competing theo-philosophic myth system? What, apart from conviction and passion on the parts of its adherents, differentiates it, or any of them, from superstition?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 03:13 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Free will?

"Not my will but thine be done..."


By the way....you do know to whom Jesus was addressing this comment, do you not?

The god who offers its "will" in the following passages:

"Slaves, male and female, you may indeed possess, provided you BUY them from among the neighboring nations. You may also BUY them from among the aliens who reside with you and from their children who are born and reared in your land. Such slaves YOU MAY OWN AS CHATTELS, and leave to your sons as their hereditary property, MAKING THEM PERPETUAL SLAVES. But you shall not lord it harshly over any of the Israelites, your kinsmen." Leviticus 25:44ff


"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be
put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their
lives." Leviticus 20:13


"If a man has a stubborn and unruly son who will not listen to
his father or mother, and will not obey them even though they
chastise him, his father and mother shall have him apprehended
and brought out to the elders at the gate of his home city, where
...his fellow citizens shall stone him to death." Deuteronomy 22:18ff


"When you march up to attack a city, first offer terms of peace.
If it agrees to your terms of peace and opens its gates to you,
all the people to be found in it shall serve you in forced labor.
But if it refuses to make peace with you and instead offers you
battle, lay siege to it, and when the Lord, your God, delivers it
into your hand, put every male in it to the sword, but the women
and children and livestock and all else in it that is worth
plunder you may take as your booty and you may use this plunder
of your enemies which the Lord, your God, has given you." Deuteronomy 20:10


"I, the Lord, your God, am a jealous God, inflicting punishments
for their fathers' wickedness on the children of those who hate
me, down to the third and fourth generation." Deuteronomy 5:9


"Therefore, he who has any of the following defects may not come
forward: he who is blind, or lame, or who has any disfigurement
or malformation, or crippled foot or hand....he may not approach
the veil nor go up to the altar on account of these defects; he
shall not profane these things that are sacred to me, for it is
I, the Lord, who make them sacred." Leviticus 21:18ff


So that is what Jesus was advocating. Doing these things...these bits of your god's "will."


Frank again you just don't seem to get it...

Do you remember the holy spirit dove entering Jesus at baptism? This gave Jesus a new spiritual ability unparalleled till then.

Jesus blood did not come from Mary but it came from the sperm created by God in her womb... This is why a mother can have a different blood type than her baby. Since the Bible says that the sins of Adam and Eve were in the blood, Jesus was not dead in sin as the rest of the world because his blood was new as "the second Adam..." Thus God was able to give Jesus a greater anointing. The sprit was able to reside in Jesus as it did with Adam and Jesus remained without sin because (under the law) he obeyed God... Yet Jesus had compassion/grace/mercy which was not an obvious part of the law...

Hebrews 2:14
Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

Comment:
We are partakers of flesh and blood But Jesus only took part... What part did he take from the existing humans? He took the flesh part from mary and the blood part from God thus he had holy blood and by his blood are we healed...

Jesus could KNOW clearly the one true God because he had a spiritual ability that FAR SUPERSEDED that of Moses...

As we can KNOW God even better than Jesus with Christ in us because Christ is now at the right hand of the father...

If people paid more attention to what the Bible says they would KNOW the will of God too...
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 04:09 pm
Rex, reciting your mythology doesn't validate it. You are preaching, proselytizing and parroting. Give it a break - try something new, like actual discussion and discourse.

Now, once again, lets get back to square one - what about the Abrahamic mythopaeia validates it - let alone elevates its Protestant Christian subset above any competing theo-philosophic myth system? What, apart from conviction and passion on the parts of its adherents, differentiates it, or any of them, from superstition?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 04:11 pm
timber, You're gonna wait an awful long time for rex to answer your question; prolly never.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 04:16 pm
Oh, I know, c.i. ...

The fact remains that is the key question in this discussion, the foundation of this discussion, and the fact remains it has been neither answered nor even honestly addressed.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 04:47 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Rex, reciting your mythology doesn't validate it. You are preaching, proselytizing and parroting. Give it a break - try something new, like actual discussion and discourse.

Now, once again, lets get back to square one - what about the Abrahamic mythopaeia validates it - let alone elevates its Protestant Christian subset above any competing theo-philosophic myth system? What, apart from conviction and passion on the parts of its adherents, differentiates it, or any of them, from superstition?



Holy spirit, faith and practice...

Proselytizing and parroting? NOT

Pointing fingers again huh?

You call it mythopaeia I call it the word of God...

I do not live in the OT, why? Because it is not addressed to me... People are justified by faith and not law...

I think you are proselytizing and parroting...

Don't throw words at me unless you want them thrown back...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 04:50 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Oh, I know, c.i. ...

The fact remains that is the key question in this discussion, the foundation of this discussion, and the fact remains it has been neither answered nor even honestly addressed.


People learn of the true faith by comparing spiritual with spiritual and not by throwing around slurs...
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 07:23 pm
Rex, your accusations fall as flat as your attempts to validate your proposition. I say agaiun, you are preaching, proselytizing, and parroting, that precisely, and nothing but. I note too that when substantively challenged, your resort is to attack, employing avoidance, mischaracterization, projection, transferance, label-mongering, and denial. Your responses present not argument but arrogance and agenda.

You, as is anyone, are perfectly welcome to believe what and as you wish, and just as perfectly welcome to discuss - even promote - those beliefs. However, if you wish others, particularly those not inclined as yourself, to take seriously what you have to say, then teach, don't preach. Explain, don't disclaim. Postulate and propose, don't pontificate. To this point in this discussion, you have not addressed the issue at discussion. Your manner of discourse here casts both your proposition and yourself as laughingstock. You are your own most effective opponent.

In case it has slipped your mind, I point again to the question which is at square one here - what about the Abrahamic mythopaeia validates it - let alone elevates its Protestant Christian subset above any competing theo-philosophic myth system? What, apart from conviction and passion on the parts of its adherents, differentiates it, or any of them, from superstition?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 07:39 pm
Me thinks rex is a preacher - third class.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 07:40 pm
djbt wrote:
real life wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Anybody confused yet? LOL

Only you.


I am confused by these apparent contradictions, real life. If you are not, could you explain to me how they can be reconciled. Feel free to take them one at a time, I'll probably get swamped otherwise!


Well, starting with the very first one we obviously encounter the product of a confused mind:

cicerone imposter wrote:
Good and evil: should we want to know the difference? No,
that was the sin of Adam (Gen 2:15-17, 3:4-6)


The sin of Adam was not in wanting to know the difference between good and evil. He knew the difference. The sin of Adam was partaking of evil by disobeying God's direct instruction. Adam knew it was wrong to disobey God and knew that disobedience carried a severe consequence. Eve's response to the serpent shows that they both understood this clearly.

It doesn't purport to show a contradiction as much as it does try to claim the Bible is teaching something ridiculous. (That is very common among so-called "Bible contradictions". They are not contradictions at all in the classic sense, but are more often "Why did God say not to..............?" or "Why did God tell X to .............?" or "How can we believe God is loving when in life we encounter tragedy?" or similar objections to the content. )
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 07:42 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Me thinks rex is a preacher - third class.


Surprise! You can actually think? Amazing...

I am ordained but I prefer one on one exchanges for the most part.

Most of Jesus' encounters were one on one...
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Aug, 2005 07:47 pm
real life wrote:
maporsche wrote:
RexRed wrote:

I suppose non-christians, few as they may be, are perfect angels... especially democrats.


First off, not that it matters, much of the population is "non-christian". There are millions of people who label themselves as "christian" but are not living the life a "good christian" should. They will die with sin on their heart and go to hell, same as you. I don't think it's possible to die with a clean soul, you'd have to repent the second before you death.

Someone stated that the soul goes to heaven because its reached perfection. Someone explain exactly how that is.


Second off, since you bring politics into this, show me where in the New Testament it says to bomb your neighbors (worldly neighbors, Iraq), MURDER innocent children (out of the womb, Iraq), and ignore and spit on the poor in the country (poor healthcare & rising costs & reduced coverage, ineffective welfare system, lowering taxes on the richest Americans, and creating fewer jobs (our unemployement is over 5%, with Clinton it was under 4%).

I know that I read Jesus say that somewhere, didn't I? Oh and don't even try to bring OT LAWS into this debate, you've repeated OVER AND OVER that those LAWS no longer apply, and that only what Jesus said applies. So defend those republican positions/actions with Jesus' words.


Do I understand you to say that Christians err because they do not have political positions that fulfill the commands of Jesus to feed the poor, care for the sick, etc ?

Are you saying that the government of the US should be fulfilling these commands of Christ?

I thought you were all for separation of church and state?

-----------------

Or would you prefer to discuss Iraq since you mentioned it twice? Saddam Hussein and his sons caused mass graves to be dug in Iraq with thousands of innocent victims. One notable method of torture was to run opponents thru the plastic shredder. Dismemberment and sending the body parts to the widow were also frequent favs. Are you saying that it is immoral to oppose such behavior?

Many innocent civilians unfortunately died in WWII while bringing the era of Hitler to a close. Tens of thousands , in fact.

Innocent civilians have lost their lives in Iraq also, no question. However, many more were brutally murdered under Hussein each year. The gassing of the Kurds comes to mind as another example.

Are you suggesting that Christians, in order to be true to Christ, must turn a blind eye to brutal regimes such as Iraq that murder their own people and are a danger to the world? Hussein's sponsorship of terrorism is well known and his stockpile of 500 tons of uranium just prior to the war is, as any reasonable person could see, NOT an indication of benign intent.

---------------------------

So go for it, maporsche. Either issue is open. You want the government to be the church? Or you want to defend Saddam's right to rule?


I NEVER suggested ANYTHING you just posted. Stop putting words into everyone's mouth. It's pathetic. But to answer your questions 1) No & 2) No.


RexRed stated that Democrat Non-Religionists were "perfect-angels" (sarcastically).

I was pointing out that the SELF-PROCLAIMED religious right were indeed NOT FOLLOWING the laws that Jesus gave to Christians. I was pointing out that they (and apparently YOU) are HYPOCRITES! Jesus would not have ordered Saddam Hussian to be captured, would he? Answer that question, WWJD? To claim to be a follower of Christ (religious right) and have actions that are in direct contridiction to the teachings of your Christ is hypocritical. Is it not?

Questions for you to answer (to keep it simple for you).

1. Would Jesus have killed the innocent Iraqi's to remove Saddam from power?
2. Would Jesus have ordered his followers (Christian's) to remove Saddam, knowing that innocents would be killed?
3. Would Jesus be pleased with money being taken away from the poor and given to the rich?
4. Would you please show me where Jesus said to bomb your enemies and take money from the poor?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/16/2025 at 05:06:47