Which Religion is the One True Religion?

maporsche wrote:

real life wrote:

Actually He sees all.

Only morons capitalize pronouns.

You know, you really should think about what you write before you post it.

Do you not capitalize "I" in referring to yourself? If so, are you one of the morons to which you refer?

maporsche Near-Enthusiast
If you were an English major you would understand. If you knew Jesus as your personal Savior you would live with Him in the after life.

Jo

maporsche Near-Enthusiast
If you were an English major you would understand. If you knew Jesus as your personal Savior you would live with Him in the after life.

Jo

real life wrote:

maporsche wrote:

real life wrote:

Actually He sees all.

Only morons capitalize pronouns.

You know, you really should think about what you write before you post it.

Do you not capitalize "I" in referring to yourself? If so, are you one of the morons to which you refer?

In the immortal words of Homer Simpson.....DOH!

Good call. Let me rephrase.

Only morons capitalize pronouns other than "I", that don't start at the beginning of a sentence or in the title of a paper, movie, article, etc. I'm sure there are other examples, but I'm not an English major, so screw it.

However, your use of the capital letter "H" in your sentence was wrong. It always kills me how you religous folk capitialize any reference to your god.

real life wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

Do morons start sentences with "i"? I guess only in real life they do.

dyslexia wrote:

i hate to sound trite (not really) but not unlike the "puzzle) of the tree falling in the woods there is an obvious answer in that sound is not an "event"unto itself, it is a process with an originati ...

from http://www.able2know.com/forums/about1119-0-asc-70.html

yeppers, i most often post on forums like this sans captializing and/or adequate punctuation. It is a fault i recognise and have been reprimanded on this many times. I am also often called a moron. what really surprises me is that you went back to Dec 03, 2002 to find me doing this.

Comment: Cloning humans is next. I wonder if god is the "creator?"

South Korean Scientists Clone Man's Best Friend, a First


By GINA KOLATA
Published: August 3, 2005
In a tour de force, a team of South Korean researchers reports it has cloned what scientists deem the most difficult animal of all - the dog.

It was a feat that took nearly three years of intensive effort, seven days a week, 365 days a year. Dogs have such an unusual reproductive biology, scientists say, that the methods that allowed them to clone sheep, mice, cows, goats, pigs, rabbits, cats, a mule, a horse and three rats, and to create cloned human embryos for stem cells, simply do not work with them.


Ahn Young-Joon/Associated Press
Scientists named the 67-day old dog Snuppy, for Seoul National University puppy.


Hwang Woo-Suk/Seoul National University
Snuppy, right, a baby Afghan hound, is the clone of the dog at left.
Other cloning researchers said they were in awe of the South Koreans' effort and dedication. Some had tried to clone dogs, but given up in despair.

Lee Beyong Chun, the first author of the dog cloning paper, published today in Nature, says he and his colleagues began the process on Aug. 2, 2002, supported by a grant from the South Korean government. Working nonstop and using 1,095 dog eggs, they finally ended up with a baby Afghan hound that is a clone of an adult male Afghan.

The puppy, an identical twin of the adult Afghan but born years later, was delivered by caesarian section on April 24 from a yellow Labrador surrogate mother. The pregnancy lasted a normal 60 days and the baby dog weighed a normal 550 grams, or one pound and 3.4 ounces.

The scientists named it Snuppy, for Seoul National University puppy.

Speaking of the Koreans' startling feat with dogs, a cloning researcher at Texas A & M University, Mark E. Westhusin, said dogs' "reproductive biology makes them a nightmare."

Dr. Westhusin cloned the first cat, in 2002, on his second attempt. But, he says, after trying for a few years to clone a dog, "I quit."

Dr. Westhusin's work with cats and dogs was sponsored by a private company, Genetic Savings & Clone of Sausalito, Calif. Its chief executive, Lou Hawthorne, says the company has spent seven years and more than $19 million dollars in its attempt to clone a dog. It just opened a new lab in Madison, Wis., with 50 employees. But, so far, no dogs have been cloned.

Other researchers say dog cloning is so hard they wouldn't touch it. George Seidel of Colorado State University says Genetic Savings & Clone approached him. "I refused," he said.


Comment: Cloning humans is next. I wonder if god is the "creator?"

god in general is a noun and is not capitalized. Our Lord God is a proper name and is capitalized. When the word he is used it is used the same as God and, therefore, is capitlized as He. If that is going to be a point of discussion rather than the topic at hand then you will never find the answer to the original questions.

How would you react if you cloned a human who, after being born naturally, displayed some terrible defect of health or character as a result of imperfect cloning, but had normal intelligence? What would you say to that person when they realized how they came to be?

I'm not commenting on the legal or theological implications; just what would you say?

Intrepid, If you know anything about my position on religion and gods, you would know that the question was made in jest. It was a rub against those who think god and religion is the answer to their life's devotion. Science continues to disprove the bible and its god.